User talk:Xexerss

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Hi @Xexerss, there is new article to create about a manga serialized in Young Champion from 2006 to 2011 which also has three other manga series, can you create it? It's Tōhai by Kōji Shinasaka. It also has an article in Japanese: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/凍牌

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 16:25, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I'll be able to create it right now. The series may be notable, but I couldn't find enough coverage by doing a quick search, and the Japanese article mostly cites primary sources. Xexerss (talk) 17:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Xexerss, so you will create it in the future? Tebus19 (talk) 17:58, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm able to find more secondary sources, yes. I'm just not focused on creating articles right now, so I'll consider it later. Xexerss (talk) 18:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Xexerss, did you find more secondary sources about the series? Tebus19 (talk) 17:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tebus19: Sorry, I honestly haven't taken the time to look any further since then and I don't think I'll be creating the article anytime soon. Xexerss (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss if you have a free time add image of Firefly Wedding Venom5122 (talk) 10:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, there is a new article to create titled New Lone Wolf & Cub, it is a sequel series to the Lone Wolf and Cub, which serialized in Weekly Post from 2006 to 2008 and licensed by Dark Horse Comics, can you create it?

Also, the manga has another sequel called Soshite Kozure Ōkami: Shikaku no Ko, that I don't know if it is notable or not. M.A.LasTroniN910^t@lk 05:13, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@M.A.LasTroniN910: Doing a quick search, I found some coverage, so I'll consider it, but I don't think that I'll create it within the next days, maybe in another week or so. I think that the other series should be included in that same article. Xexerss (talk) 05:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Xexerss (talk) 08:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, if you have time can you add volume 1 cover of manga series It Takes More Than a Pretty Face to Fall in Love? Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 01:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss if you have a time add image of Gunka no Baltzar Venom5122 (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss if you have a time add image of Tenkaichi: Nihon Saikyō Bugeisha Ketteisen Venom5122 (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, there is a new article to create about a manga series by Haruka Mitsui serialized in Kodansha's Nakayoshi magazine since November 2020, can you create it? It's Anyway, I'm Falling in Love with You.

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 10:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I'll try to create it soon. Xexerss (talk) 10:23, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Xexerss (talk) 10:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, need to separate the episodes for Tsukimichi: Moonlit Fantasy as its own article. I'm afraid that the main page may be overloaded with the episodic content. KANLen09 (talk) 15:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Although I admit that I myself have done splits for tables with the same amount of episodes before,

WP:OTHERCONTENT is not an argument, I suppose that there are no issues with it right now. In any case, the 'Post-expand include size' of the article is currently at 407,735/2,097,152 bytes, so the table is not a problem right now (perhaps someone will do the split later on anyway, but I have to decline for now). Xexerss (talk) 18:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi there! Thanks for all your hard work on anime/manga articles (and fixing my bad citations...). I was thinking of adding the tracklist for the MP100 drama CD that I added to the article, so I'll probably make that edit later tonight. There's a pretty popular fan-sub of the CD on Youtube, but I'm not sure if I should cite it/add it to the article since it's not official. Thoughts? Dognamedguinefort (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dognamedguinefort: Hi. As far as I've seen, articles tend to include the tracklist of the series' soundtrack (e.g. in Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba or Berserk (1997 TV series)), but I don't know of cases where the tracks from the drama CD are included (I don't think there is something that prohibits it though). In any case, the CD is assumed to be the primary source and doesn't usually require citations. Xexerss (talk) 20:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, if you have time can you add volume 1 cover of manga series Nippon Sangoku? Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 00:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, there are two respective new articles to create about two respective manga series both serialized in Kodansha's Monthly Shōnen Magazine, can you create them? They are Sudachi no Maōjō by Makoto Morisaki and Futari Switch by Akira Hiramoto.

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 00:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll create the first one, but I couldn't find enough coverage for Futari Switch. Xexerss (talk) 02:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done Xexerss (talk) 03:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma%C5%8D-gun_Saiky%C5%8D_no_Majutsushi_wa_Ningen_Datta# This is the page, i have tried to edit the genre of this anime on basis of article by comic natalie{https://natalie.mu/comic/news/557701} but there seems to be no visible change, can you please look into it? Inuyasha4560 (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could u join The Stike or Gutter reddit AstraeusØ (talk) 16:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not interested. I don't have a Reddit account anyway. Xexerss (talk) 20:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

Thanks Tebus19 (talk) 12:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I'll create it soon. Xexerss (talk) 12:10, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Xexerss (talk) 13:13, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, there is another new article to create about a manga series by Taiga Miyakawa serialized in Ganma! since 2013 with a recently announced TV anime adaptation, can you create it? It's Tasūketsu. There is also a Japanese wikipedia: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/多数欠

Source for anime news: https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2024-01-26/taiga-miyakawa-tasuketsu-manga-gets-tv-anime-this-year/.206893

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 11:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not particularly interested. If I were to do it, I don't think I'd create it in the next few days, so I suggest asking another editor. Xexerss (talk) 11:49, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, if you have time can you add volume 1 cover of manga series My Dear Detective: Mitsuko's Case Files?

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 22:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think the plot section for The Unwanted Undead Adventurer should be deleted because it was copied from the J-novel Club website. The thing is, I don't know how to handle this, I do know that for things like this we use a template that will notify the admins to check this and even delete its history from database.

Source: https://j-novel.club/series/the-unwanted-undead-adventurer Parham.es (talk) 16:32, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked it. Template:Copyvio-revdel contains instructions for its use. Xexerss (talk) 16:50, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many Thanks. Parham.es (talk) 19:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, there is a new article to create about an ongoing manga series serialized in Mag Garden's Monthly Comic Garden magazine since October 2020, can you create it? It's Night of the Living Cat. There's also an article in Japanese: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/ニャイト・オブ・ザ・リビングキャット

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 11:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll try later. Xexerss (talk) 12:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Xexerss (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, there is another new article to create about a manga series serialized in Kodansha's Weekly Shōnen Magazine magazine since September 2022, can you create it? It's Honeko Akabane's Bodyguards. There's also an article in Japanese: https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/赤羽骨子のボディガード

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 22:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try later. Xexerss (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Xexerss (talk) 09:36, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://aonoexorcist.fandom.com/wiki/Nemu_Takara

according to the Blue exorcist fandom, it appears to have a puppet's seiyu Go Inoue, although the link from this seiyu has a the Japanese wikipedia. https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/tv-shows/Blue-Exorcist-OVA/Nemu-Takara-Puppet/ here's the behind the voice actors website about the puppet's jp va. does this count as a citation? 2600:8807:484D:8D00:41EA:AE90:AF8F:4B2A (talk) 05:25, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikis are

WP:A&M/ORS, BTVA is reliable only when the roles and confirmed with a green checkmark. Xexerss (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi @Xexerss, could you please add an image for the article Cheerful Amnesia? Thanks SimonLagann (talk) 20:34, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SimonLagann: Apologies for the late response. I just read the message and noticed that other editor already added it. Xexerss (talk) 03:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You have reverted an edit of mine in the Delicious in Dungeon and removed a website and added another reference to a different paragraph. However, the location and the new reference do not really support the reason behind my edit (which I summarized as "a reference to the old d&d similarity"). If you go through the history of the article, you can see that the reference to the Dungeons and Dragons go way back. The text used to refer to AD&D at some point, because AD&D placed a more significant role to the tracking of supplies and equipment. Over the years the text got modified and ended up with its current form.

Since the description of the plot is not sourced, from the above mentioned history, it looks like it has been written casually by multiple wikipedia contributors over the years . This was not something I liked, so I wanted to find whether there are indeed sources that explicitly related the subject matter to "old versions of D&D". (A borderline case of WP:NOR: Who states that the subject matter is similar to the old versions of a particular game?). I agree that Kotaku is a much better source with a long history (and corresponding notability), but it is also not a book, academic article or newspaper, it is still a web blog. And it does not really address the weakness in the article that I was trying to address. Erkcan (talk) 13:29, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:VG/S. Now, to be frank, I'm not sure about the reliability of The Nerd Stash. I couldn't find any precedent or discussions about the reliablity of the site, so I propose rephrasing the sentence (perhaps without necessarily mentioning the "old D&D" part) or discussing whether it's fine or not to cite The Nerd Stash. Xexerss (talk) 14:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

The statement that the subject material is quite similar to old D&D is actually apparent to me as well, but my personal opinion does not matter. There are discussions on reddit which also mention the same opinion (ex: [1]), as well as other blogs (ex: [2]), so it seems like the statement about the similarity is not a matter of opinion of a single person or two. Would it be reasonable to cite the Kotaku article together with the one from The Nerd Stash? Alternatively, we can remove the D&D related phrase altogether. Erkcan (talk) 16:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Erkcan: It's fine with me if it's completely removed. It's not a comparison that affects the plot itself to begin with. Xexerss (talk) 22:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers. Erkcan (talk) 07:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, This user is editing and reverting the edits without any explanation, Can you give the user a warning? M.A.LasTroniN910^t@lk 16:48, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Made an article for Kurapika. Still has far more potential considering the character plays a major role in the first movie (which I gotta first watch to edit that) but I couldn't find any google scholar article that heavily discusses the character even though I've seen some Hunter X Hunter essays focused on the androgynous aspect and personality of some characters. For the image I simply cut the silhoutte from a volume cover since it had the chains and red eyes but maybe the image could be better edited. Feel free to edit anything. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: It looks good. I'll see if I can find another image. Cheers. Xexerss (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I'm not exactly sure but while Gon's image it's from the manga it appears it was digitally colored by Shueisha. If you think there is a better image in the manga feel free to replace it. Kinda like his Jajan Ken stance if there is any. Tintor2 (talk) 23:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Not the Jajanken stance, but I found this one sometime ago. Not sure if this one is good, but I'll see if I can find another. Xexerss (talk) 03:22, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, there is a new article to create about a manga series by Machiko Kyō serialized in Shueisha's Jump X magazine in 2014 with an short anime movie adaptation released in 2015, can you create it? It's Mitsuami no Kami-sama.

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll try soon. Xexerss (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Xexerss (talk) 20:41, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

Source: https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2024-02-09/neet-kunoichi-to-nazeka-dosei-hajimemashita-manga-gets-tv-anime/.207435

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 14:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tebus19: I'll try to create it soon. By the way, I had already read your message. I wasn't responding because I was attending other edits, so there was no need to delete it and write it again. Xexerss (talk) 14:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Xexerss, i’m so sorry then. Tebus19 (talk) 14:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.  Done Xexerss (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can it be used alone in the genre or should we use the Martial Arts genre? Because this manga is specifically about swordsmanship. M.A.LasTroniN910^t@lk 09:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:A&M's talk page for other opinions. Cheers. Xexerss (talk) 15:18, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello, As far as I know if a season of anime has name for it self, whether it's a letter like "S" or a word like "Alicization" (SAO) or even something like "2nd attack" which is something like 2nd season but a little different (anime studios like to play with words :D) will have its own section in info box. Also I found this article to back it up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_animanga#Usage

I also asked this from other editors some time ago and the thing I found out is that sometimes we have exception but overall this is correct.

Now the problem that I have is that an editor has a different idea about this and they are backing their opinion by providing some other articles that probably should have a new section for their new seasons and don't for whatever reasons and because of this they say Bottom-tier Character Tomozaki should also follow them in this matter. I mean this doesn't even make any sense. First of all there are no rules that says every article should be a copy/paste from one another and second of all just because some editors didn't care to add a new section it doesn't mean we should use those articles as a model am I correct? We also shouldn't forget about the exception part I mentioned.

Anyway you can clearly see what I'm saying by checking this: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bottom-tier_Character_Tomozaki&action=history Can you please tell me your opinion in here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bottom-tier_Character_Tomozaki

I genuinely want to know your opinion on this matter.Parham.es(talk) 18:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Parham.es: Honestly, it is not very clear to me what the criteria is for knowing when to separate the components or leave it as one. In my opinion, if there are no substantial differences in the production and staff of each series (or season, whatever one may want to call it), and there is not a considerable distance of time between each one (i.e. more than four years), I generally would advocate leaving it as one component, regardless of the title. I'm not sure if there is a universal approach for this though. For example, an editor considered that the the two seasons of Black Lagoon (TV series) should have been combined as one component. In the Kaguya-sama: Love Is War (TV series) article the subtitles were placed at top. Perhaps the latter option would be reasonable for the Bottom-tier Character Tomozaki article, but that's just what I think. Xexerss (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see, Kaguya-sama is actually a good way to handle this, because as I said in the talk page of Bottom-tier Character Tomozaki article I am kinda on the same page with the other editor since they made a valid point about information being repetitive, Alright then, will go with Kaguya-sama's style.

Thanks for the help, it's always appreciated. Parham.es (talk) 19:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say that I might not even use Kaguya-sama's style since we just have a season 2 right now and it might confuse some people that this section of infobox is just for Season 2 and season 1 doesn't have any, so I'll wait for a season 3 for this specially since the name of the season 2 is so close to being 2nd season. Parham.es (talk) 19:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds fine to me. Xexerss (talk) 19:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, there is a new article to create about a manga series titled For the Kid I Saw in My Dreams by Kei Sanbe, which serialized in Young Ace from July 2017 to July 2022 and licensed by Yen Press, can you create it? M.A.LasTroniN910^t@lk 08:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try this weekend. Xexerss (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I'll probably create more articles occasionally, but I'm not planning to take on more requests for some time. Thanks for your understanding. Xexerss (talk) 01:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, there are two respective new articles to create about two respective manga series by Takashi Sano, can you create them? They are Back When You Called Us Devils and Kimi ga Kemono ni Naru Mae ni (with a recently announced TV drama adaptation).

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 15:57, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try this weekend. Xexerss (talk) 19:10, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I'll probably create more articles occasionally, but I'm not planning to take on more requests for some time. Thanks for your understanding. Xexerss (talk) 01:55, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Xexerss! I have a manga-related favor to ask: Would you take a look at [3]? Does it seem legit to you? Joyous! Noise! 02:19, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Joyous!: Hi. I'm not really familiar with the story of Spy × Family, but I think that the last two edits by Milana Tkach include too much details. I'm of the idea that character descriptions should be relatively concise without going into too much detail about their plots and stuff. Xexerss (talk) 02:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening Mr./Mrs. Xexerss I hope I am not bothering you but I wanted to know if by any chance it was you who cancelled my edit regarding Sonic X season 1 and 2 of the last part, if it is possible can we talk about it and see if we can find a solution together please? Crystal890 (talk) 22:02, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Crystal890: I think editor 331dot explained it quite well already at your talk page. Xexerss (talk) 22:22, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now that this article has been expanded and it was copy-edited once in September 2023 by

@M.A.LasTroniN910: Sorry, I wouldn't really know. You should ask another editor who is more knowledgeable about GAN. Xexerss (talk) 08:42, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @

@SimonLagann: Hi. I'm sorry, but I'm not interested in creating articles for the time being and I can't promise that I'll create it in the short term. The series may be notable, but given that it is a long-running series, gathering the sources to create it may take more time than I have at my disposal right now. Xexerss (talk) 17:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was curious about it. Should the awards from anime news network and animetrending also be mentioned? The first I used in an article was one Askeladd won in 2019 which helped backup his notability . Same with 2023 Thorfinn. While I'm not sure about animetrending, I have Ishiguro talking about it Last weekend when Heavenly Delusion won anime of the year. You find them worth it? Cheers. Tintor2 (talk) 16:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: I think it is. I recall that the site was discussed a couple of times previously. The awards have been mentioned by Anime News Network and the site has been cited by them multiple times as well. Anitrendz have their own editorial team and have conducted several interviews with key figures in the field. I at least consider that they are a reliable source and the awards warrant notability. Xexerss (talk) 16:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see. What about listing the awards from the anime news network editors? At least I use them plus the commentary like with Frieren's title character which is also kinda new Tintor2 (talk) 17:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it's fine to mention them as well. Xexerss (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think that the stylized logo of Dr. Stone should be Dr. STONE, because even if it looks like "Dr.STONE", if official sites like Manga Plus and Crunchyroll write "Dr. STONE" it means that it's supposed to be written like that. Why should a simplified logo mean more than an official title? Fleyzk (talk) 14:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fleyzk: But stylization refers to how the logo appears on the volumes of the series, not how certain platforms write the title. That's why in articles such as One Piece or Bleach (manga) stylization is denoted by "stylized in all caps". Also, stylization is usually denoted only when the series' title is rendered in Latin script in the original language (Japanese), so, in this case, it makes more sense to follow this instead of following the stylization used on some platforms. Xexerss (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was wondering do I need to

@Parham.es: If there is enough coverage now, I suppose that it would be fine to create it now. Xexerss (talk) 19:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I made a mistake and instead of creating the article with this name:

The Irregular at Magic High School (season 3). How can I change it? Correct me if I'm wrong but I need to use the "Move" section from the article, right? Parham.es (talk) 18:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@Parham.es: Yes, that will do. Xexerss (talk) 18:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then thanks, for the reason of the Move "remove unnecessary parentheses/disambiguator" is the right one correct? sorry If I'm asking these easy questions, this is my first time doing it and I want to make sure I'm doing it right :D Parham.es (talk) 18:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Parham.es: Yes. That was the consensus of Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (television)#Follow-up RfC on TV season article titles. Xexerss (talk) 18:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, wanted to respond to some points in your revert message on the Medalist (manga) page since it seems there's some misunderstanding.

You said "PV has not premiered yet" – but this is incorrect, because it had. I added it shortly after the premiere at 11 p.m. JST that day; the video was live and publicly viewable, and not region locked to Japan or anything like that. It also had official English subtitles and title metadata set by the studio, which were also viewable at that time. As a result, I honestly don't know what you're talking about or what this message means.

You also wrote that "the video is from a Japanese account, not an English one" – yes, because this is a Japanese show produced by a Japanese studio. Is that surprising…? And what's the issue? It's not likely that any English-language license will be announced in the near future, thus most sources regarding the show are going to be in Japanese. The source language of a reference has no bearing on its ability to be used in a Wikipedia article and, in fact, one should pretty obviously expect most sources about a show from Japan to be in Japanese, especially when it's nearly a year away from airing. –Fpmfpm (talk) 11:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fpmfpm: 1) When you added the citation the video was not available for viewing yet. 2) In the 'language' parameter you added that it was in English, when obviously it was not. Xexerss (talk) 21:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1) Yes it was.

2) I guess the citation tool got that one wrong and I didn't catch it. Would have been easier for you to simply fix it rather than remove it entirely!

Re: your edit message "Are you planning to post here every time a trailer is uploaded before the series is released?" – No, and why would you assume this? I think it's worth mentioning the first-ever trailer's release, nothing more. This is also done on many, many other anime-related articles (both shows and films – which your userpage says you're well-versed in editing, so I'd expect you to know this too. Here are some examples:

Laid-Back Camp (season 1), Shirobako: The Movie, Suzume, Onyx Equinox, The First Slam Dunk, Fruits Basket: Prelude, Devil May Cry (TV series), Sarazanmai, Exception (TV series), Detective Conan: Black Iron Submarine, JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Stone Ocean. Happy to provide more if needed! As a result, I'll plan to add this back into the article shortly unless you still have objections. –Fpmfpm (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

@

WP:OTHERCONTENT. I at least don't see the encyclopedic value of simply mentioning the date when the trailer was posted (I think that the information provided by the trailer is more relevant than the trailer itself). It doesn't seem such a significant event compared to the other content mentioned in anime section (for the Medalist article at least). Xexerss (talk) 12:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm aware there doesn't need to be consistency between articles, but there is a reason dozens and dozens of other editors have all come to the same conclusion that the information about a first-look teaser is often worth mentioning due to what it signals in a show's development timeline. I do understand where you're coming from, and think that it'd be helpful if you could try to understand why so many people view it as natural to include in articles like this as well. I agree – sure, I think we can say that the cast list, staff information, and exact on-air date were also revealed on that day, because along with the trailer's premiere revealing loads of new information, the official website was updated at the same time, and now today a second key visual has been released as well.

It's worth preserving that this is all happening now, in early 2024. Shouldn't the article aim to give people some sense of this production timeline, not just… serialization started in 2020, and then… boom, out of nowhere, the show premieres in 2025? It's natural to wonder: what happened in between, and when? (I just realized that the article doesn't even mention when the anime adaptation was announced, which should also be fixed, IMO.) The flurry of activity recently – fronted by the first-ever trailer releasing, letting people finally see the manga in a near-final animated form, full-color, with music and all – is a critical, key time in the show's development/production. If we're aiming to keep the article and that section comprehensive, it should be (briefly) mentioned, not overlooked completely or intentionally avoided. –Fpmfpm (talk) 12:52, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fpmfpm: What do you mean with "the article doesn't even mention when the anime adaptation was announced"? The article literally has the sentence "An anime television series adaptation was announced on May 18, 2023"; isn't that enough? Most (if not all) TV series release trailers, key visuals and such to make themselves known to the audience, but I ask what is the point here of just mentioning the date a trailer was posted? What would our readers miss by not knowing this event? Xexerss (talk) 13:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see, my point is that I can see the relevance of mentioning when the announcement of an adaptation is made (for the mere fact that receiving an adaptation is something noteworthy), the staff (mainly to support the information that appears in the infobox), and the premiere/airing dates (likewise, for the infobox and for the eventual creation of episode list sections/articles). I don't see, however, the relevance of just mentioning the dates, without further context, when a trailer (or a key visual or similar) of a series is released. It's not that I'm strongly opposed to mentioning the event, it's just that I don't understand its relevance for the article and what is the encyclopedic contribution that it provides. It's also worth mentioning

WP:NOTNEWS, and therefore, it's not like we have to mention every event related to the anime release to "give people some sense of this production timeline". Xexerss (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

OK. You clearly care about this a ton more than I do for this one single article, for some reason, so we can do it your way; I'm too lazy to keep arguing. I'm sure it'll get added in by someone else at some later point who hasn't had to deal with all of this, and you can keep being a cop to watch out for that. Take care. –Fpmfpm (talk) 00:37, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fpmfpm: Sorry, but you were the only one who came all the way to my talk page for this whole thing instead of moving on, and I'm just explaining my reasons for removing what you added. You can think whatever you want about me for that. Xexerss (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This wiki doesn't have the template about Non-English anime licensee since not every anime can be license to the English anime licensee such as Crunchyroll, especially to the Asian markets where English wasn't their main language. (Crunchyroll did have English dubbing for some of their anime that was carried by another licensee in the Asian markets, such as Muse Communication and Medialink) VernardoLau (talk) 06:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@VernardoLau: Hi. Sorry, but I don't quite understand your point. From what I understand, Medialink and Muse Asia have licensed a number of titles for English-speaking territories in Asia (there are English-speaking territories in South Asia and Southeast Asia, as you can see in their articles). I assume that when Medialink or Muse Asia post in English on their social networks that certain titles have been acquired it is because they are intended to be distributed for English-speaking audiences in the English-speaking territories where these companies operate. However, seeing that the Instagram publications regarding Muse Asia's distribution of Undead Unluck was only posted in Chinese, it seems unlikely that the acquisition is intended for English-speaking audiences. From what I understand, English is not officially spoken in Taiwan, and although Hong Kong does have a significant portion of the population that speaks English, just judging by the publication alone, it doesn't seem that the series' acquisition is intended for English-speaking audiences in those countries. Xexerss (talk) 09:02, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, As far as I understand each template has its own rules which means another template rule is not applicable for another (kinda). The reason why I brought this up is because I've seen in some article, Spy × Family (TV series) for example that some editors keep deleting the last_aired date of the anime even though it is ended and insist that based on Template:Infobox television's rules "Set the last episode date as the "last_aired" date only if there is no announcement for 12 months". My problem is that we are not even using Template:Infobox television for animes but using Template:Infobox animanga/Video which doesn't have such a rule and as far as I know the reason we have different templates for different subjects and stuff (well one of the reasons) is because of different situation they can have, for example everyone knows that animes are always ended unless they announce something, every single season counts as the last one, unless they announce two or more seasons before hand. So because of this I assume they didn't include the 12 months rules in Template:Infobox animanga/Video because anime simply doesn't work like normal TV series does. As you can see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Spy_%C3%97_Family_(TV_series)&action=history I changed this twice and both times was done by two different editors in this article, but I really wonder am I even right about this? honestly using another template's rules doesn't make sense to me, we do have another template for animes for a reason! Parham.es (talk) 19:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Parham.es: If the article is using Template:Infobox animanga/Video, I don't see what Template:Infobox television has to do with it. If an editor has a problem with that, then they should start a discussion and not make those changes just like that. If there is no kind of announcement implying that a series is going to continue, I don't see any reason why we should say otherwise in the article. Xexerss (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Xexerss,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why it doesn't require italics while yuri, yaoi, yakuza etc. do? Fleyzk (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

MOS:FOREIGN#Terms with common usage in English. Leaving aside the fact that the yakuza article uses italics in specific parts, the other terms don't have common usage in English. Note that the term isekai is included in the Oxford English Dictionary.[4] Xexerss (talk) 20:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

It seems like in starting the sentence with "Such as" is impromper and an incomplete sentence, no? It seemed clunky/wrong when I was reading through the article and so I attempted a fix. If my fix wasn't up-to-code, that's fine, but it still doesn't seem right. I was also thinking of just changing the period to a comma and making it one longer sentence - even that litte change seems better than the original. Thoughts? Pac12dan (talk) 17:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

assume good faith in your edit nonetheless, so feel free to reword the sentence again, but please try to be thorough with the way you rewrite it. Xexerss (talk) 17:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

I agree, upon reading it back I don't think my edit was an improvement. If I come up with something I'll have another go. Appreciate the feedback! Pac12dan (talk) 18:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Xexerss, you have reverted changes i made adding some wikis to external links without any explanation as to why, so i would like to humbly ask why this was reverted, keeping in mind i'm not used to all the rules yet. It was my understanding that such links were welcome, see for example the wookiepedia link on star wars or the memory alpha one on star trek. Thank you very much. TheBookfinder (talk) 20:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:OTHERCONTENT into account. Xexerss (talk) 20:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Alright i had not clicked on WP:ELNO, i gave it a good read, thank you.

If i understand correctly the links i have put to open wikis would be fine in the future once they have a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors, which isn't currently the case? TheBookfinder (talk) 20:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:TEA if you have more inquiries about this. Xexerss (talk) 21:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Ok thank you very much for the clarification, help, and taking the time to answer. TheBookfinder (talk) 21:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Xexerss, there is a new article to create about a manga series by Shiro (same author as Encouragement of Climb) serialized in Young King OURs since 2019 with a live-action TV drama adaptation, can you create it? It's Camera, Hajimete mo Ii Desu ka?.

Thanks. Tebus19 (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tebus19: Alright. I have some time for now, so I'll do it in a while. Xexerss (talk) 22:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Xexerss (talk) 23:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Xexerss, thank you so much, and if you have more time, can you also create Koi wo Shiranai Bokutachi wa? It's shōjo manga series by Minami Mizuno (same author as Rainbow Days) serialized in Bessatsu Margaret from 2017 to 2021 with a recently announced live-action film adaptation. Source: https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2024-04-03/rainbow-days-creator-minami-mizuno-koi-o-shiranai-boku-tachi-wa-manga-gets-live-action-film/.209532 Tebus19 (talk) 10:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tebus19: Alright, I'll try to create it in a while. It may be the last article I can create for now, so I'll have to turn down further requests for the time being. I hope you understand. Xexerss (talk) 15:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Xexerss, yes i understand, in fact that's why i wrote in the section title "(my last request)" for some time. Tebus19 (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. Xexerss (talk) 16:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Xexerss (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]