User talk:Yorkshiresky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not

autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages
.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious

Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here
.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

thanks for adding the date reference on A Serious Man --Ring Cinema (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, the ref was there previously. But an over zealous editor removed it when trimming the plot.yorkshiresky (talk) 16:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Welcome

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to

User WikiProject Films
}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's
    main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it
    .
  • The project has a
    several other formats
    are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Want to jump right into editing? The
    style guidelines
    show things you should include.
  • Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the
    Announcements template
    to see how you can help.
  • Want to see some great film article examples? Head on over to the
    spotlight department
    .
  • Want to know how good our articles are? Our
    assessment department
    has rated the quality of the majority of film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask

another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 21:35, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:FILMS August 2010 Newsletter

The

August 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:59, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]


I have nominated Philip Dodd, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Dodd. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:26, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILM September Election Nomination Period Open

The

September 2010 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting five coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next year; members are invited to nominate themselves if interested. Please do not vote yet, voting will begin on September 15. This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 03:50, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

File source problem with File:Grenata street gang.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Grenata street gang.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Longitudinal Video Recording

Shubinator (talk) 14:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The article

source
that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Alpha Quadrant talk 20:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:FILMS September 2010 Newsletter

The

September 2010 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 04:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Kathy & Carol

Great minds think alike! We must have started writing the same article on about the same day, after getting our copies of Mojo. Anyway, let me know what you think. I'd be happy to nominate it to

"Did You Know" as a collaboration, maybe after a few more tweaks to it. Regards, Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:08, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Succession boxes

I noticed you added back in succession boxes for some articles including

WT:CHARTS
is leaning against them, a true consensus has not been reached and it would be great if you can add to the discussion to give reasons why you prefer to have them for songs and albums that went to number one on any chart.

Here is a link to summary of issues that I brought up when trying to come up with a compromise for succession boxes back in March:

WT:CHARTS#Consensus on use of succession boxes?
.

  • "A labyrinth of every imaginable component chart and airplay chart"
  • "A succession box where neither the predecessor nor the successor has an article isn't a useful navigation tool"
  • "Succession boxes are not to present information. They are not to document the number of weeks on a chart. ... They are a navigational tool."
  • "Succession boxes [relating to music articles] are an indiscriminate collection of information as "Excessive listing of statistics" that is not notable to the subject"
  • "They are a "navigation tool" to other number one "Songs" and Albums that really have no connection with the page they are on."
  • "The information contained in the boxes is often unsourced (particularly the dates) and relies on other Wiki articles to determine what came before and after the article topic on the charts."
  • "People are posting incorrect dates concerning the time frame that a song is at #1 on Billboard's charts"
  • "We don't have to include the nav-boxes so people can find this information, since we have all these lists"

In addition to the above, I see them as unnecessary and redundant, especially since I am providing links to lists of #1 charts, which still may be a bit excessive. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 23:25, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kathy and Carol

RlevseTalk 18:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:FILM October 2010 Newsletter

The Octoberr 2010 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 00:49, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bigger Trees Near Warter

Gatoclass (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

DYK for So It Goes (Nick Lowe song)