Vanguardism
Part of a series on |
Leninism |
---|
Vanguardism, in the context of
Foundations
In its first phase, the vanguard party would exist for two reasons. Firstly, it would protect Marxism from outside corruption from other ideas, as well as advance its plans. Secondly, it would educate the proletariat in Marxism in order to cleanse them of their "false individual consciousness" and instill the revolutionary "class consciousness" in them.
Our task is not to champion the degrading of the revolutionary to the level of an amateur, but to raise the amateurs to the level of revolutionaries.[5]
If the party is successful in their goal, on the eve of revolution, a critical mass of the working class population would be prepared to usher forth the transformation of society. Furthermore, a great number of them, namely their most dedicated members, would belong to the party
Political party
This section needs additional citations for verification. (November 2022) |
A vanguard party is a
Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx presented the concept of the vanguard party as solely qualified to politically lead the proletariat in revolution; in Chapter II: "Proletarians and Communists" of The Communist Manifesto (1848), they said:
The Communists, therefore, are, on the one hand, practically the most advanced and resolute section of the working-class parties of every country, that section which pushes forward all others; on the other hand, theoretically, they have over the great mass of the proletariat the advantage of clearly understanding the lines of march, the conditions, and the ultimate general results of the proletarian movement. The immediate aim of the Communists is the same as that of all other proletarian parties: Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat.
According to Lenin, the purpose of the vanguard party is to establish a
Marxism–Leninism
Part of a series on |
Marxism–Leninism |
---|
As he surveyed the European milieu in the late 1890s, Lenin found several theoretic problems with the
It is often believed that Lenin thought the bearers of class consciousness were the common
Like other political organisations that sought to change Imperial Russian society, Lenin's Bolshevik Party resorted to conspiracy, and operated in the political underground. Against Tsarist repression, Lenin argued for the necessity of confining membership to people who were professionally trained to overthrow the Okhrana;[
The notion of a 'vanguard', as used by Lenin before 1917, did not necessarily imply single-party rule. Lenin considered the
The impetus for having a vanguard party was used by the Bolsheviks to justify their suppression of other parties. Their rationale was that since they were the vanguard of the proletariat, their right to rule could not be legitimately questioned.[citation needed] Hence, opposition parties could not be permitted to exist. From 1936 onward, Communist-inspired state constitutions enshrined the "father your own family and let your families live in a nation with society" rubric by giving the Communist parties formal leadership in society—a provision that was interpreted to either ban other parties altogether or force them to accept the Communists' guaranteed right to rule as a condition of being allowed to exist as an alternative party.
Part of a series on |
Trotskyism |
---|
In the 20th century, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) continued regarding itself as the institutionalisation of Marxist–Leninist political consciousness in the Soviet Union; therein lay the justification for its political control of Soviet society. Article 6 of the 1977 Soviet Constitution refers to the CPSU as the "leading and guiding force of Soviet society, and the nucleus of its political system, of all state organizations and public organizations". The CPSU, precisely because it was the bearer of Marxist–Leninist ideology, determined the general development of society, directed domestic and foreign policy, and "imparts a planned, systematic, and theoretically substantiated virtuosity" to the struggle of the Soviet people for the victory of communism.
Nonetheless, the politics of the vanguard party, as outlined by Lenin, is disputed among the contemporary communist
Frankfurt School
For some in the Frankfurt School, the lumpenproletariat (underclass) have the potential to be vanguardists in the revolution. They argue this underclass has the potential to change the status quo because they are excluded from it and survive largely outside of the capitalist system. Marx viewed the lumpenproletariat with suspicion and as a reserve army of labour with a primarily counter-revolutionary character unlike the industrial proletariat, whose role in production led Marx see them as the primary agents of change. For some in the Frankfurt School, the lumpenproletariat existing outside the capitalist production process gives them the unique ability to attack the capitalist system from outside which other revolutionary elements can not.[11]
Other uses
Although Lenin honed the idea in terms of a class leadership forged out of a proletarian vanguard specifically to describe Marxist–Leninist parties,[12] the term is also used for many kinds of movement shaping themselves as initially guided by a small elite. Theodor Herzl, the theorist of Zionism, believed legitimation from the majority would only hinder from the outset his movement and therefore advised that "we cannot all be of one mind; the gestor will therefore simply take the leadership into his hands and march in the van."
Herzl's principle antedated by some years the Leninist idea of Bolshevism as the vanguard of the revolution by characterizing the "Zionist movement as a vanguard of the Jewish people."
According to Roger Eatwell, some
See also
- Authoritarian socialism
- Avant-garde
- Blanquism
- Bonapartism
- Cadre (politics)
- Democratic centralism
- Dictatorship of the proletariat
- Elite theory
- Foco
- Jacobinism
- Maoism
- Organic centralism
- Transitional government
References
- ISBN 9781412959636.
- ISBN 9781137389961 – via Google Books.
- ISBN 9781412959636.
- What is to be Done? – via Marxists Internet Archive., quoting Clause 1 of the Rules of the German Social-Democratic Party.
- ^ a b c d Lenin 1901.
- ISBN 978-0-14-051274-8 – via Internet Archive.
- ^ Le Blanc 1990, p. 49.
- ^ Serge, Victor (1930). Year One of the Russian Revolution. p. 243 – via Marxists Internet Archive.
- ^ Le Blanc 1990, p. 260.
- ^ Le Blanc 1990, p. 306.
- ISSN 2619-4023.
- ISBN 9781134493678 – via Google Books.
- ISBN 978-0-307-77253-4 – via Google Books.
- ISBN 9780521630122 – via Google Books.
- ISBN 9781594033711 – via Google Books.
- ^ Kramer, Martin (June 1996). "Fundamentalist Islam at Large: The Drive for Power". Middle East Quarterly. 3 (2): 37–49.
- ^ a b "Jamaat-e-Islami". GlobalSecurity.org.
- ^ "Search: vanguard". Bahá'í Reference Library. 2019.
- ISBN 978-1-84413-090-0.
Bibliography
- Humanities Press International.
Further reading
Arts
- Burger, Peter. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Theory & History of Literature Series. 135 pages. ISBN 0-8166-1068-1.
- Forster, Merlin H. and K. David Jackson, compilers. Vanguardism in Latin American Literature : An Annotated Bibliographic Guide. Bibliographies and Indexes in ISBN 0-313-24861-3.
- Maerhofer, John. 2009. Rethinking the Vanguard: Aesthetic and Political Positions in the Modernist Debate, 1917–1962. New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Press. ISBN 1-4438-1135-1
Politics
- Vladimir Lenin What is to be done?
- Yevgeny Bugaev. What Is the Party? Moscow: Progress Publishers. 1986.
- ISBN 0-394-41601-5. Retrieved May 17, 2005.
- Gray, Phillip W. 2020. Vanguardism: Ideology and Organization in Totalitarian Politics. London: ISBN 978-0-367-33166-5
- Mandel, Ernest. "Trotsky’s conception of self-organisation and the vanguard party". Originally published in French in Quatrième Internationale, No.36, pp. 35–49. November 1989. Translated by Mike Murray, marked up by Einde O’Callaghan for the Marxists’ Internet Archive. Retrieved May 24, 2005.
- Mitchell, Roxanne and Frank Weiss. Two, Three, Many Parties of a New Type? Against the Ultra-Left Line. Publisher: United Labor Press. 1977. Retrieved May 25, 2005.
- Slaughter, Cliff. "What is Revolutionary Leadership?". Labour Review. Socialist Labor League. 1964?. Retrieved May 17, 2005.
Polemics
- Cooper, Nick. Critique of Revolutionary Communism . Belgium Indymedia. Sep. 23, 2004. Retrieved June 3, 2005.