Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air Tetiaroa

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:56, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Air Tetiaroa

Air Tetiaroa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Private transportation company with three planes and one route. Fails GNG and NCORP, no SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth from independent RS. Sources in article are promotional and to the subject's website.  // Timothy :: talk  09:47, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - added independent sources.--IdiotSavant (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What sources?  // Timothy :: talk  02:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Four articles from Tahiti Infos, one of French Polynesia's largest news sites.--IdiotSavant (talk) 09:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional or at best ROUTINE. Nothing with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. eg: "If visitors spend only a few minutes, they will be entitled to all the comforts: refreshments, Wi-Fi, television or anything else they need"  // Timothy :: talk  09:57, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There's also an in-depth article (in French of course) from Radio1.--IdiotSavant (talk) 12:08, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. All sources, including the new ones, are promotional. Web-search gave me a lot of pages like this, too, but I found no independent RS. Suitskvarts (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 14:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete however, the airlines are notable in general, and there are many not much better sourced airlines, this particular page looks not-notable. --Rodgers V (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.