Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bairwa

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. and no indication any further input is forthcoming. While this could be a soft delete, CT55555 doesn't serve up poor sourcing, so while they aren't saying keep, that seems to be what they're implying. No objection to a re-nom for better participation at another time Star Mississippi 02:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bairwa

Bairwa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Effectively unsourced. The only source is a JPG, which does not support the claims in the article. cagliost (talk) 12:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups and India. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I see they are mentioned in Jatav. If they are indeed a scheduled cast there must be plenty of sources about them, including policy documents, official stats and reports etc aside from news items. Without searching in some key Indian languages it’s hard to know, but I think deleting without that kind of thorough search would be a mistake. At worst draftify. Mccapra (talk) 13:33, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 13:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 14:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 19:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose deletion. We should be assessing this based on sourcing that can be found, not the article. I added one already and see more here: Pathak, B. (1993). Rural Violence in Bihar. India: Concept Publishing Company. p192 CT55555(talk) 05:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'm not a big expert here, but even the new added source is about a "leader of the Bairwa community" (and the eponymic one), not about the ethnic group in discussion. It still could be a real thing, but out of proportion or something. Btw, I don't see much sense in draftifying, coz the article is quite short and already has issue templates. Redirect to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes doesn't sound good, too, because that arcticle doesn't mention it. Suitskvarts (talk) 14:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.