Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estevan Payan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Waggers TALK 13:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Estevan Payan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:NMMA. His highest ranking by Fight Matrix was 81st in the featherweight division, and he has never previously appeared in Sherdog's rankings. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 01:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Boxing, Martial arts, United States of America, and Arizona. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 01:12, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails MMA Notability as per
WP:NMMA Lethweimaster (talk) 14:22, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Failing
WP:GNG is established. There are a lot of articles from MMAJunkie.com that to me go beyond routine. Then there is the Lethwei World article that due to the style's limited nature in US lends to notability. There are also some MMAFighting.com and MMAMania.com references. Going thorough all those, I say GNG is met so keep. RonSigPi (talk) 19:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Passing mentions does not constitute significant coverage. There is no claim to notability for the subject which has not won any notable championships
WP:ATHLETE. Lethweimaster (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Multiple of the references list the fighter name in their title, hardly passing mentions but instead clearly the focus of the references. And I think winning a notable championship is WAY to high a bar for notability. RonSigPi (talk) 08:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articles from MMAFighting and MMAJunkie are literally just fight announcements with a little bit of info about both fighters padded in. This is pretty routine and standard coverage you come across with most mixed martial artists, nothing significant to pass GNG I'd say. ♡RAFAEL♡^(talk) 16:32, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's clear he doesn't meet
WP:GNG when the bulk of the article is just a listing of the fights on that card or of results. Given his fight records, it's not surprising he's never come close to, much less won, a major title. Papaursa (talk) 19:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
It wasn't for a world title in Lethwei, I dont know where you saw that. It was also not Lethwei as per World Lethwei Federation, if you read the article. I agree with point mentionned. Lethweimaster (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that in the article's fight records section where it says "For the inaugural Cruiserweight World Lethwei Championship Title." Papaursa (talk) 12:10, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I follow Lethwei pretty closely, I know this fight was not for world title. Also no mention of it the article by Lethwei World. They even explain that the fight was not considered Lethwei. [1] Lethweimaster (talk) 17:03, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 20:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.