Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GrayStillPlays

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 04:05, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GrayStillPlays

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No signficant coverage in reliable sources. The articles tend to be about a video that he made, and not about the person. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable YouTuber.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:15, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as the creator of this article, I am obviously biased here, but I believe this YouTube channel passes GNG. He has received a paragraph, and thus significant coverage, in The Washington Post here:[1], and while the following articles are primarily focused on his videos, they still do provide enough coverage of him specifically to count towards a GNG pass, as can be seen here:[2], and here:[3] when translated. Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:02, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable enough to pass GNG. Trivial coverage. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 08:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I added another source to the article, which can be accessed here:[4]. Devonian Wombat (talk) 10:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To give !voters the more opportunity to evaluate Devonian Wombat's sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:26, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable, hardly covered in media.
talk) 13:43, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - Sources are passing mentions and some of them don't even mention the YouTuber. Kori (@) 06:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per not notable youtuber. Jcoolbro (talk) (c) 13:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article focuses too much on newer videos and the subject is not of importance, all articles are very vague DCook (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.