Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunnar Klack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnar Klack

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are passing mentions. Fails

WP:BIO. Possibly single event news, whats there anyway. scope_creep^Talk 13:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Architecture, and Germany. Shellwood (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Possibly TOOSOON? Some media coverage that could imply meeting criteria 7 of WP:Notability(academics) but he might be well producing those in his function as a journalist not as an academic. The article would need more evidence of notability - either general, or as an academic or author. JamesKH76 (talk) 08:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added two references as evidence of notability, this might meet criteria 7 of WP:Notability(academics): substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity. Andreas Tuffé (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You added a youtube video which has 168views and is likly non-rs because of that and a 40 documentatry short where he presents is not evidence of an academic. The real problem there is no mainstream evidence. Its all patched together. It should be immediately visible by a 2 minute search. scope_creep^Talk 06:51, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Does anybody else anything to say about this. scope_creep^Talk 06:51, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:22, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable academic. Coverage is minor. Andre🚐 06:16, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunately, not enough notability present as of now. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 15:35, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.