Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamdy El-Said
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. I do not believe a third relist is likely to get closer to a consensus. Stifle (talk) 09:13, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Hamdy El-Said
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails
WP:NOLY. His highest ranking by Fight Matrix is 104th in the world heavyweight rankings, which is not even close to the top 10 requirement. He also failed to win a medal in his appearance at the 2016 Summer Olympics, having been eliminated in round 16. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 13:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, Olympics, Wrestling, and Egypt. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 13:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep He doesn't meet either SNG, but it looks like there's enough coverage of him to pass GNG. In English, there's [1] [2] and [3]. I don't speak Arabic, but using Google Translate I was able to find some additional Arabic sources: [4] [5] [6]. I'd like to get an Arabic speaker's opinion on whether there are additional Arabic sources or the quality of the sources I linked, but it does look like significant coverage exists. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 01:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:43, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete He fails ]
- Weak Keep. I'd say the articles linked by TheCatalyst31 just get him over the GNG bar. BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:07, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting in light of new sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.