Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heldref Publications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Heldref Publications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage. The only reference in the article is not independent of the subject. SL93 (talk) 01:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Companies, and Washington, D.C.. SL93 (talk) 01:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep old publisher effectively purchased by T&F. Could be merged at T&F, but it's better as a standalone article.
  b} 02:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge/redirect to Taylor & Francis Andre🚐 00:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to
  HighKing⁺⁺ 19:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, it looks like a new source has been added by it looks like the trend is to Redirect this article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.