Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivar Navelsaker

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to

Spartaz Humbug! 12:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Ivar Navelsaker

Ivar Navelsaker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing anything that especially distinguishes him from the rest of the officers in World War II. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment He appears to have been included in a Norwegian "Who's Who", so assuming it is a reputable one, then there may well be significantly more to found about him in Norwegian. It might help if someone who knows something about Norwegian sources could chime in here. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:40, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Norway. Shellwood (talk) 09:24, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge: Well this is either Keep or Merge to battle of Dombås; the Norwegian and Danish sources (I've added another) think him worth a mention (usually for one paragraph) for his part in the battle, and even if Norway has a small population, getting an entry in their Who's Who is significant. He does seem to be recorded only for the one event - not very surprising as he was taken prisoner - so his notability is borderline, and a merge to the battle article would probably be best. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:11, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep given that he was a military officer and there's some available information regarding him, I see no reason to delete this, the merge option is possible but the article seems passable to me. N1TH Music (talk) 07:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.