Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques J.A. Asselin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio ^giuliano 09:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jacques J.A. Asselin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Fails

WP:BIO, a gnews search comes up with a Asselin involved in petanque, and a lottery winner, I don't think it's the same person as ambassador. LibStar (talk) 03:06, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:48, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Senegal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:49, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:30, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: given the large number of ambassadorial posts we see here, it would be better to tag for better references, rather than rushing to delete. Moonraker (talk) 03:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Where are the sources that establish notability? LibStar (talk) 03:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He is seen as a credible officer who held many important positions. I have added 2 book references which might help to pass notability Christopheronthemove (talk) 07:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You added two primary non-independent registry sources... JoelleJay (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG, BIO, NPOL. Sources in the article and BEFORE showed primary, listings, mentions, nothing that is SIGCOV from IS RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse. Keep voters above have failed to show any IS RS with SIGCOV, just opinions not backed by policy and guidelines, in fact they are repeatedly dismissing BLP guidelines regarding sourcing. // Timothy :: talk 23:21, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As TimothyBlue said, fails
WP:NPOL.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.