Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kehinde Ajose

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 01:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kehinde Ajose

Kehinde Ajose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Interviews and PR piece — good for business but not good for an encyclopaedia. Reading Beans (talk) 06:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, appears to have a few deeper articles about him. Andre🚐 05:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure! But these articles are PR sources... detailing how he's helping people get publicity. Since they're promotional pieces, it only means they're not independent. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 06:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, he's in the PR field and an author, so I think we're conflating PR pieces versus pieces about him that are about PR. Andre🚐 17:13, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:31, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, Andre, could you point out which sources are "deeper" and aren't just PR spin?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Sources are wall to wall PR and vanispamcruft. Mccapra (talk) 12:52, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete PR and fluffy spam pieces as sources, nothing we can use. Delete. Oaktree b (talk) 17:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.