Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mayors of Pekin, Illinois
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete . The deletes were based on
List of mayors of Pekin, Illinois
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of mayors of Pekin, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails LISTN. Long list of nn names. Souces in article are primary, no other sources show this meets LISTN discussing this as a group. LISTCRUFT // Timothy :: talk 10:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Illinois. Shellwood (talk) 12:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 11:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Though a small handful may be notable via service in the legislature, most are not. Fails ]
- I will note that, as per the list presented below, there are two additional mayors who are notable via service in the legislature but do not yet have articles. As such, I think there is merit to at least a partial merge argument, but the logic for keeping is still shaky at best. Curbon7 (talk) 04:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Two have articles, and it is otherwise a useful list that is too long to keep in the main article. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Lists in Wikipedia need to be either encyclopedic content meeting NLIST or serve a purpose around CLN/AOAL. This list does not meet either criteria. Wikipedia is not a repository for everything. The source for the list can be easily added (believe its already there) to the main article. Listcruft like this could be created for public officials of various offices in almost all towns in much of the world. There is no need or useful purpose to list all nn mayors of all towns in separate lists, no need for separate lists of nn city councils, nn country sherrifs and coroners, or any other lists of nn public officials not passing NLIST. This is not a list of notable mayors. // Timothy :: talk 21:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
- Lists can also be considers a valid spinoff from a parent article (in this case the city of Pekin). It is not up to us to judge whether there is a need or a useful purpose, but whether the article complies with our community policies and guidelines. As I mentioned above, I don't think a list of elected officials (especially a list of mayors) clearly is described in WP:NOT and often, the community has evaluated a list of mayors at AfD through the lens of the size of the city, which is not necessarily the best metric. - Enos733 (talk) 23:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)]
- Lists can also be considers a valid spinoff from a parent article (in this case the city of Pekin). It is not up to us to judge whether there is a need or a useful purpose, but whether the article complies with our community policies and guidelines. As I mentioned above, I don't think a list of elected officials (especially a list of mayors) clearly is described in
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There is no real notability in having been a mayor of Pekin. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I put a neutrally-worded notice at Talk:Pekin, Illinois. QuicoleJR (talk) 15:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep There are two entries so it is a spin-off from the page. As an alternative. Include on the page for Pekin under Government. It could be in a collapsed list as such.Patapsco913 (talk) 04:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Unneeded CFORK, only purpose is to make readers chase links. // Timothy :: talk 04:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- The list is useful. Not sure how it gets people to chase links? Why would someone chase a link if they were not interested? Is not one of the purposes of wikipedia is to link related articles?13:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Unneeded CFORK, only purpose is to make readers chase links. // Timothy :: talk 04:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete unclear how this meets WP:LISTN. ResonantDistortion 16:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)]
Mayors of Pekin, Illinois | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
References
- ^ Renner, Chic; et al. (1974). Pekin Sesquicentennial: A History, 1824–1974. Pekin Chamber of Commerce. p. 162.
- WP:SPINOFF argument?]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. I don't think it is important that the people on the list are not individually notable. I am assuming good faith for online sources. I am not certain of this part (hence the "weak") but I don't think the sources are primary. Most importantly, this seems like useful encyclopedic information. This is exactly the sort of thing I can imagine historians wanting to read about. I know there is a culture of requiring three sources, but I don't think that is a rule. CT55555(talk) 01:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: To reiterate, the only reason why four (out of the ~50 listed) are notable is not because of their tenures as mayors of this exceptionally small town, but because they instead held a separate not an indiscriminate database of every single small-town mayor that's ever lived. Curbon7 (talk) 02:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.