Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Metal Masters Tour

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 02:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Metal Masters Tour

Metal Masters Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLAR'd to Judas Priest in December 2022 due to notability concerns. The redirect was contested at this RfD on February 10 because there were four notable bands featured in this tour (Judas Priest, Motörhead, Heaven & Hell, and Testament), so this could not be redirected anywhere and participants agreed to take the page to AfD. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Pinging the following participants: HorrorLover555, A7V2, QuietHere, and Red-tailed hawk, as well as relisters CycloneYoris and Jay. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 03:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Found this source covering setlists and these three show reviews in a brief search. There's also quite a few articles covering the announcement ([1][2][3][4][5][6][7]). This is looking really keepable to me so far. QuietHere (talk) 07:47, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On top of that, there's this piece from Billboard, this interview in Guitar World, a mention in Rob Halford's book, and this mention in a book on Sabbath. Dunno how much all of that contributes to notability since the mentions are fairly passing, but maybe there are some juicy details worth adding in there that I skimmed past. And there's also a cover story in Revolver which I can't find an archived copy of just yet; that's gotta be worth something. I'd be willing to vote keep based on everything I've dug up so far, especially given it wasn't entirely thorough and there could easily be even more. QuietHere (talk) 07:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:54, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Consensus is strongly leaning delete, however giving more time for sources to be found. If not...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. I don't see a consensus here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.