Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Baah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:34, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Baah

Michael Baah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet the basic badminton criteria WP:NBAD to qualify for a Wikipedia article. zoglophie 05:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Badminton, and Ghana. zoglophie 05:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:28, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Sourcing consists entirely of statistics tables, game recaps, and mentions in lists of players. No SIGCOV whatsoever. –dlthewave ☎ 02:02, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails
  WP:SPORTBASIC #5; nothing more than trivial coverage found. The article creator has done well to build something from the stats coverage and passing mentions that are available but the subject doesn't seem to meet our minimum inclusion criteria. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete. After an independent in-depth look into the article subject, I find that it fails
  WP:SPORTSBASIC under criterion 5. Shawn Teller (talk) 19:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.