Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinaki Chaudhuri

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinaki Chaudhuri

Pinaki Chaudhuri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not meet any of the following standards of notability. Khorang 22:31, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:48, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment there is a claim of notability here: “ He was awarded with two National Awards for the Best Feature Film in Bengali, first one in 1996 for Shonghaath and again in 2007 for Ballygunge Court. Chowdhury was honoured as Jury Member in various Film Festivals and was the Chairman of the Jury Board for selection of Indian films for National Awards”. That’s unsourced but I don’t think we should delete unless a Bengali-speaker confirms a lack of sources to support it. Mccapra (talk) 08:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep (leaning) Not a language expert but this is what I found:
    • This appears to confirm the two national awards [1] (will add to article)
    • bn.wikipedia has an article but little information and no refs, I expected more. Articles exist elsewhere, but I don't think they will have sources.
    • They have a lot of obits. All the normal issues with Obits, but the number combined with the above awards makes a case more is out there.
    • I searched পিনাকী চৌধুরী and found enough on the first couple pages to make me believe there is more out there.
    If a language expert articulates how my assessment is off, I'd probably yield to their opinion.  // Timothy :: talk  02:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 08:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.