Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renfroe's Markets

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 02:32, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Renfroe's Market

Renfroe's Market (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable grocery store with only 6 locations. Meatsgains(talk) 00:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The name of the subject was likely spelled incorrectly, unwittingly. I believe it is "Renfroe's Market." No reliable sources are cited in the page; however I did find a few from local news outlets through a quick online Google search. [1] [2] [3] [4]. The Montgomery Advertiser story is the strongest source and coverage. The page should have multiple reliable, independent sources cited to avoid a deletion. Multi7001 (talk) 01:05, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with
    HighKing++ 20:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 02:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I could only find the sources listed above. The chain may expand, but it's just
    WP:TOOSOON for now, with just 6 locations and limited coverage. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 22:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.