Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reza Goodary

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing, successes do not add up to any of the applicable sports guidelines, nor is GNG met. Star Mississippi 14:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reza Goodary

Reza Goodary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet notability criteria for sportsmen as per

WP:PAID. Lethweimaster (talk) 16:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep Meet

WP:NKICK by a lot of reliable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.204.251.47 (talk) 03:48, 16 August 2022 (UTC) [reply
]

Clearly does not meet
WP:NKICK. Lethweimaster (talk) 11:18, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above IP is evading a block and is not welcome around these parts. – 2.O.Boxing 07:35, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

He has won no significant titles and has never been ranked in the world top 10 so he fails to meet either of the notability criteria mentioned by the SPA above. Even with the Kyokushin World Tournament Open having been split into at least 4 or 5 competing factions (each with their own championship), I don't see any evidence of him being the world champion in any of them. An 8th place in one of them is not a "world champion". Will reconsider if reliable independent sources are provided for those accomplishments. Papaursa (talk) 04:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Lack of independent, in-depth coverage. Sources listed above show no indication of meeeting
    WP:GNG. Slywriter (talk) 17:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Delete Nobody has provided compelling evidence that
    WP:MANOTE standard of adult black belt success. I also found the article's tone very promotional and lacking a neutral point of view, although those alone are not grounds for deletion. I am willing to change my vote, should additional information come forth, but for now I am unconvinced of his WP notability. Papaursa (talk) 23:40, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.