Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn Kumagai
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:58, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Shawn Kumagai
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Shawn Kumagai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
run of the mill local coverage that any person in either of these roles would merely be expected to have in their local media, not evincing any proof that he could be seen as more notable than other city council colleagues or other candidates on the same state legislature ballot.
Obviously this is without prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the state legislature seat, but nothing here is sufficient grounds for him to already have a Wikipedia article today. Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
]
Obviously this is without prejudice against recreation in November if he wins the state legislature seat, but nothing here is sufficient grounds for him to already have a Wikipedia article today. Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California. Bearcat (talk) 14:45, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I could not find many sources which were not already cited, and these sources are insufficient to prove notability as the nominator suggests. No significant coverage appears forthcoming. - Talkback) 15:35, 11 August 2022 (UTC)]
- Draftify: so we can pull it back if he wins. Otherwise, not notable at the moment (fails ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any more support for draftifying or should this article just be deleted?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete refbombs, wow. non-notable.Oaktree b (talk) 23:50, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as a local politician, fails WP:NPOL. Deathlibrarian (talk) 05:54, 26 August 2022 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.