Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speda TV

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. and suggest a history merge with the other draft if this is the one that's ultimately improved Star Mississippi 02:54, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speda TV

Speda TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails

WP:GNG. The sources provided are either from the outlet itself, ROUTINE listing, or brief mentions. I'm concerned, also, that this was made in main namespace to circumvent an already-declined draft. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:17, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Hello, @Chris troutman I have published an article about one of the most important Kurdish channels in Iraq, as it has strong sources talking about this channel and I linked it with the article, as well as it has many internal sources within Wikipedia related to the article:
and mentions the extent of its importance in Iraqi society in particular In the Kurdistan region of Iraq, and a while ago with a group of other editors, we modified and corrected the errors that were present in the article.
Therefore, I ask you not to delete this article because it represents a large media organization in the Kurdistan region of Iraq, and I ask you to forgive us for the errors that may be in the article because I am a new member of Wikipedia. Thank you very much.
Mr-MohammedAzeez (talk) 22:50, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KSAWikipedian (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KSAWikipedian (talk) 17:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Draftify / merge to the draft. Andre🚐 18:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relisting. For those advocating draftify, there is an existing draft. Should it be replaced by this version or should the main space copy be deleted?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:40, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The mainspace copy is not the same as the draft; it is better with more sources. I would recommend that the article be moved instead deleted. The draft is at a slightly different name (Tv instead of TV), so they can both exist, keeping all the history of both until either is improved enough to be moved back to mainspace. MB 14:10, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.