Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tampa Bay Parenting Magazine

Add links
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.


The result was delete. BD2412 T 01:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tampa Bay Parenting Magazine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Tampa Bay Parenting Magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly PROMO. No links to any critical discussions of the magazine, all I find are articles they've published. Oaktree b (talk) 16:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Social science, and Florida. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 16:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep Article edited to now include dozens of reliable and authoritative sources. Notability is presumed for magazines under
    WP:NMEDIA
    criteria. Tampa Bay Parenting Magazine meets at least one, and probably all of them. It has (1) produced works that have received well-known/significant journalism award (multiple Florida Magazine Assn awards); (2) has a significant history (15+ years of issues); (3) considered by reliable sources to be authoritative / influential in subject area (cited dozens of times by every local TV station and newspaper); (4) frequently cited by reliable sources (cited dozens of times by every local TV station and newspaper); and (5) significant publications in non-trivial niche markets (Tampa Bay area, parenting).
XfD. – The Grid (talk) 20:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
For what it's worth
subject-specific notability guideline; it's currently an essay that lacks community consensus in support of it. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While, it does have some issues with promo from the old version. With the edits however, it now seems like a fairly normal and good wikipedia article. It has a lot of sources and doing a quick Safari search wields a lot of results about them. Sorry if anyone disagrees with this. Have a good day. Tvshowoflife (talk) 18:50, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Simply no
    WP:RS discuss the subject directly and indpeth. Affliated orgs publishing their works and promo articles do not meet the guidelines.  // Timothy :: talk  21:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 02:29, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tampa_Bay_Parenting_Magazine&oldid=1147682434"