Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Whopperettes

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Burger King advertising. Liz Read! Talk! 20:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Whopperettes

The Whopperettes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Procudural nomination: Malformed AFD placed in draft-space here by an IP stating Fails GNG, no references and barely any content. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Advertising. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect (probably with a small bit of merging) to
    WP:GNG. Even the sources in the article that are from around the time period that the commercial was shown are mainly just rundowns of the Super Bowl commercials of 2006 in general. Looking for any sources created since then just turn up brief mentions as it being little more than a footnote in Burger King's history. The main article on Burger King's advertising campaigns does mention it, but a small bit of information from this article should probably be moved over to give it a bit more context. Rorshacma (talk) 21:00, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Redirectper Rorshacma 2603:6080:7C40:5E0:9922:D01F:89F4:F2EE (talk) 19:45, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 23:24, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect to Burger King advertising. No IS RS showing SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed promos, but nothing IS.  // Timothy :: talk  06:51, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.