Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uniaxial crystal
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Birefringence#Uniaxial materials. Liz Read! Talk! 05:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Uniaxial crystal
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Much more detailed coverage of the same thing already at Birefringence#uniaxial_materials Fermiboson (talk) 05:43, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. Why not merge? Dawkin Verbier (talk) 06:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment better suited for a merge discussion.--ReyHahn (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Because there is nothing to merge. Everything that is in this article is already in the section. Fermiboson (talk) 09:36, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- So redirect it. If it's duplicative, just redirect it ]
- Sure. I’ll let this run its course; if it gets deleted, I’ll request a redirect. Fermiboson (talk) 15:37, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- So redirect it. If it's duplicative, just redirect it ]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:48, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect to Birefringence#Uniaxial materials – poorly written; has no content not at the destination so need to merge any of it. I don't see why an AfD can't be closed as a redirect. —Quondum 19:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect Agree with above. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC).
- Redirect is the solution indeed. b} 03:34, 24 November 2022 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.