Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedat Marathe Veer Daudle Saat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Vedat Marathe Veer Daudle Saat

Vedat Marathe Veer Daudle Saat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. AShiv1212 (talk) 04:29, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Does not fail
  WP:NFF as there is enough significant coverage. However I won't disagree with draftifying. Timothytyy (talk) 12:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep or Draftify: There are sources. But I'm not sure this meets
  WP:NFF. 111.92.118.94 (talk) 07:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^giuliano 20:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep in article space: Meets
  WP:NFF and there is no valid reason to move to draft space. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:15, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Same reason: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal (2023 film)

Liz, comment check Additionally, films that have already begun shooting, but have not yet been publicly released (theatres or video), should generally not have their own articles unless the production itself is notable per the notability guidelines. ~ ‪AShiv1212‬ (talk) 15:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article covers many aspects of the film already apart from just principal photography. Multiple references are discussing shooting locations, storyline, controversies, launch event, etc. Thats passing

WP:GNG. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:30, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 13:28, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify. This is a film which may or may not be released eight months from now. The applied and found sources do not yet meet GNG or the SNG for films, in my view. User:Liz's close of the other linked process was correct, but that's not immediately relevant to this discussion. Despite User:Dharmadhyaksha's dismissive comment, there's inadequate sourcing to support a film never publicly released, and since this film might one day see release, I'd prefer to draftify. BusterD (talk) 17:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It meets NFF. And whats the point of moving to draft space? Whats harm in main article space? Wikipedia isn't ruining its reputation with this one article being present in Article space. Also, when moved to draft space, am sure someone will make a different article in Article space; and thats gonna be even poorer in quality than this one; but just made by a very enthusiastic newbie who wont bother to look draft spaces etc. Also, a film can still remain notable without ever being releasing. So that worry of the film not releasing in next few months is unfounded. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:14, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.