Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikimarketing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Digital marketing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimarketing

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in reliable sources, discussion on Talk:Wikimarketing produced a slew of self published or otherwise unreliable sources, and reliable sources that did not mention Wikimarketing directly, or only in passing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or move to Digital marketing as explained here. An alternative is move to Digital_marketing#Online_methods_used_to_build_brand_awareness, explaining the topic in 3 lines with the best sources. It is a reality that this type of marketing using wikis exists, and there is a term (wikimarketing) since more than 14 years.--Cartago90 (talk) 10:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – no reliable sourcing, nothing found in a
WP:BEFORE search, so nothing to merge into Digital marketing. --bonadea contributions talk 17:52, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, $Salvio giuliano$ 23:25, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete sources aren't reliable
talk) 02:04, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete or redirect to Digital marketing and/or Conflict-of-interest editing on Wikipedia. Leaning toward redirect because, while the term doesn't seem to have gotten any lasting traction, at least some books around 2008 do mention it as being in use. (example). Gnomingstuff (talk) 04:36, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.