Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 14

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
<
Log

September 14

Category:Anti-immigration activism in Germany

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: To match the larger categories e.g. Category:Anti-immigration politics by country and Category:Anti-immigration politics in Europe. User:Namiba 18:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, in practice it is a very political topic. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:10, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as a clear and neutral category name. Jontesta (talk) 00:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Mexicali Aquilas players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. – Fayenatic London 13:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This team was known as the 'Aguilas,' which translates to 'Eagles.' I'm not sure where "Aquilas" is coming from. There's already a Category:Águilas de Mexicali players for players with the same-named team that was formed in 1970 so I don't know if it should be merged or what. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 03:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:10, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: Denniscabrams has stated in an edit summary that Jorge Orta played for this team (and others), but neither he nor TartarTorte have yet provided citations for this. – Fayenatic London 20:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • This has nothing to do with this discussion but I'll humor you anyway, Fayenatic. The first, most obvious place to look is his Baseball-Reference page which is linked at the bottom of his article, as it is for all professional baseball players. I'm surprised that you have taken such a keen interest in this article without even being familiar with Baseball-Reference. Beyond that, there are plenty of other sources like this book. You can also do a cursory Newspapers.com search and find several dozen results. --Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 21:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • Thank you, Denniscabrams. I had attempted to search those reference pages for Mexicali, but had not realised that on the the Baseball Reference page it would be necessary to first click on the tab for minor/Mexican leagues. This does confirm that Orta played for them in 1971, and that the team name is Aguilas not Aquilas. [1] also confirms that Rudy Hernández (shortstop) played for them too (not Áquilas de Mexicali, as categorised by MusiCitizen). That gives two verified member articles for the category. – Fayenatic London 21:49, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Denniscabrams: I still agree with Oculi that a category should not be added to an article without explicitly mentioning - and preferably elaborating on - the fact in the body text of the article. Categories are summaries of articles, they should not provide information on their own. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:17, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Dams in Hokkaido

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Category:Dams in Hokkaido

Category:Categories by century and country

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy keep Ah, thank you for the explanation, now I got it. Privybst (talk) 15:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Confusing names of the categories. Why not to merge? Privybst (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - these are quite different: compare eg
    Oculi (talk) 15:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's ). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:People of United Empire Loyalist descent

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Category:People of United Empire Loyalist descent

Category:Set indices

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:54, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: More easily understood, and following the name of the explanatory page
WP:C2D. Note: see also Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 10#Set indices on tropical cyclones which should be closed in line with this one. – Fayenatic London 13:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Endorse.
bad idea 00:39, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Endorse. Pichpich (talk) 18:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london, for the merge (Category:Set indices on fungi to Category:Set index articles on organisms) the target doesn't exist. — Qwerfjkltalk 14:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwerfjkl: see above – it is currently named Category:Set indices on organisms. – Fayenatic London 14:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Inorganic molecular formula set index pages

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:57, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 
WP:SMALLCAT, only three pages. Otherwise, rename as above. – Fayenatic London 13:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
@Fayenatic london, appears to be a split? — Qwerfjkltalk 14:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwerfjkl: see above – the redlink target is currently named Category:Molecular formula set index pages. – Fayenatic London 14:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Death care industry

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 23#Category:Death care industry

Category:Death care companies

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename.
(non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 14:35, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Nominator's rationale: The current name has drawn negative reactions from outside the United States at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 10#Category:Funeral directors of Austria, to the point that participants are reluctant to upmerge single-member subcats to this category purely because of its name. "Funeral-related companies" was chosen for the UK sub-cat at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 September 2#Category:Funeral directors of the United Kingdom. – Fayenatic London 12:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1982 in basque peola

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. – Fayenatic London 13:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Misspelling. Replaced by Category:1982 in basque pelota Colonies Chris (talk) 10:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This category has been emptied. Liz Read! Talk! 01:05, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Approve I am quite happy for my mis-splling to be corrected Hugo999 (talk) 02:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as uncontroversial maintenance. Pichpich (talk) 18:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional avatars

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's ). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. – Fayenatic London 13:20, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Members of this category are mostly
WP:OR and are pretty unlikely to have been actually classified as avatars, save for a few select characters like Aang. I suggest it should be merged into deities, while removing the characters who are not explicitly deities in their fictional works. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 07:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Oppose No idea who Aang is. Every single Doctor Fate (male or female) is an avatar of the Mesopotamian god Nabu, Jean Grey (and several of her female relatives) are avatars of a deified phoenix, Juggernaut is an avatar of the fictional god Cyttorak, Moondragon is an avatar of the evil deity Dragon of the Moon. These people are mortal incarnations of various deities, and avatars are material appearance or incarnations of deities and spirits. Dimadick (talk) 13:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.