Search results
There is a page named "Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing" on Wikipedia
- Close paraphrasing, or patchwriting, is the superficial modification of material from another source. Editors should generally summarize source material...43 KB (5,189 words) - 23:31, 5 February 2025
- - close paraphrasing concerns. Nikkimaria (talk) 23:54, 28 December 2011 (UTC) Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Abraham_Lincoln's_patent - close paraphrasing...13 KB (1,448 words) - 18:38, 9 February 2023
- from 2012. Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Black_Action_Movement - close paraphrasing concerns. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2012 (UTC) Template:Did...46 KB (5,340 words) - 18:38, 9 February 2023
- article, even temporarily. Do not closely paraphrase a copyright text. Even if the source is credited, close paraphrasing is both copyright infringement...13 KB (1,952 words) - 21:55, 24 July 2021
- "proper paraphrasing", but of close paraphrasing with in-text attribution, which is acceptable per WP:PARAPHRASE: "Limited close paraphrasing is appropriate...148 KB (19,933 words) - 20:40, 21 May 2022
- Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiFundi Content/Help:Plagiarism and Copyright violations for students (section Close paraphrasing)news, whether you cite it or not. Examples of close paraphrasing Here's an example of "close paraphrasing." Original text: Because the weather forecast...6 KB (930 words) - 18:14, 24 October 2021
- article, even temporarily. Do not closely paraphrase a copyright text. Even if the source is credited, close paraphrasing is both copyright infringement...16 KB (2,294 words) - 16:49, 22 January 2017
- a figure of 19 percent.'" Part of this is a close paraphrasing and the rest should probably be paraphrased. I've changed it a bit, and moved it to the...2 KB (3,827 words) - 15:03, 20 February 2023
- - close paraphrasing concerns. Nikkimaria (talk) 06:23, 21 November 2013 (UTC) Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Tony_Swatton - close paraphrasing. Nikkimaria...36 KB (4,199 words) - 18:01, 5 May 2022
- check for close paraphrasing on FN 9, I find that the article text is much too close to the source text. Review Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing for advice...7 KB (984 words) - 13:48, 27 February 2023
- be made to this page. The result was delete. Particularly per the close paraphrasing issues. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:09, 18 May 2018 (UTC) Child abuse (skin signs)...4 KB (352 words) - 06:09, 18 May 2018
- TWL) I am nominating this for AfD as it appears to be entirely very close paraphrasing from the sources linked to after each section. I would CSD it, but...7 KB (628 words) - 03:30, 16 February 2022
- passages copied verbatim. It can also be used to assist in detecting close paraphrasing. Human judgment is always required. If text matches light up, the...3 KB (454 words) - 12:16, 14 September 2024
- cite, they're less likely to copyright violate, or plagiarise; but close paraphrasing by habit or accident could still exist. By this stage I've determined...18 KB (2,669 words) - 01:27, 11 July 2017
- • Most recent review Result: Kept Fixed up a few issues with the close paraphrasing. Everything else is quotes or most likely copied from here. AIRcorn (talk)...4 KB (375 words) - 10:27, 29 April 2019
- subject is - as has been noted on the talk page by two editors. Lots of close paraphrasing on the useless history section as well. The Dissident Aggressor 03:30...5 KB (456 words) - 08:27, 20 March 2022
- In-text attribution is not appropriate for other forms of close paraphrasing, such as if you paraphrase "The sky is usually blue" as "The sky is often the color...8 KB (1,089 words) - 13:58, 31 January 2025
- copyright investigations/Chamaemelum. Listing here because it's close paraphrasing, so I'm not sure if it qualifies for G12. — SamX [talk · contribs]...8 KB (462 words) - 16:17, 13 October 2023
- sold poorly. Dan56 (talk) 04:48, 9 August 2014 (UTC) Comments Dan56: close paraphrasing concerns have been brought up in some of your other FACs. Does the...3 KB (297 words) - 18:17, 14 August 2014
- different. The rules cover not only copy-and-paste plagiarism, but also close paraphrasing and copyright violations. And the stakes are high: the consequences...2 KB (216 words) - 20:19, 16 September 2017
- the quotes in the current article are taken verbatim, abridged, or closely paraphrased from the following text in Dickens' work: "Bah!", said Scrooge. "Humbug
- been put in my emails but I cannot locate it. I don't feel comfortable paraphrasing anything from memory.--BirgitteSB 02:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC) Looks