Wikipedia:Drafts
This specific page is not the place to create a new draft. For that, please see § Creating and editing drafts below. |
This is an explanatory essay about the editing and deletion policy pages. This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. |
Namespaces | |||
---|---|---|---|
Subject namespaces | Talk namespaces | ||
0 | (Main/Article) | Talk | 1 |
2 | User | User talk | 3 |
4 | Wikipedia | Wikipedia talk | 5 |
6 | File | File talk | 7 |
8 | MediaWiki | MediaWiki talk | 9 |
10 | Template | Template talk | 11 |
12 | Help | Help talk | 13 |
14 | Category | Category talk | 15 |
100 | Portal | Portal talk | 101 |
118 | Draft | Draft talk | 119 |
710 | TimedText | TimedText talk | 711 |
828 | Module | Module talk | 829 |
Former namespaces | |||
108 | Book | Book talk | 109 |
442 | Course | Course talk | 443 |
444 | Institution | Institution talk | 445 |
446 | Education Program | Education Program talk | 447 |
2300 | Gadget | Gadget talk | 2301 |
2302 | Gadget definition | Gadget definition talk | 2303 |
2600 | Topic | 2601 | |
Virtual namespaces | |||
-1 | Special | ||
-2 | Media | ||
Current list (API call) |
Drafts are
How drafts work
Finding drafts
Drafts are
As the draft namespace is a common location for incubating articles (unlike user space), users are notified through Template:New page DYM when visiting a non-existent article whose title does exist in draft space, to prevent unnecessary creation of duplicates on current events, and to help editors discover abandoned drafts to take over and save time rather than starting from scratch:
The warning is also invoked by Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Main for existing mainspace pages.
There is a draft for this article at Draft:Example.
Creating and editing drafts
Anyone, including users who are not logged in, can create and edit drafts. Drafts have "Draft:" before their normal title, and also have an associated draft talk page. Users who have
Create a new draft
|
Preparing drafts
- (Optionally) add the template {{Draft article}} at the top of the draft (not the talk page), along with the template's parameters
|name
and|subject=
. A list of appropriate subject fields can be found here. If the draft name has a redirect page of the same name, you can use {{R with possibilities}}. - Disable any categories by inserting a colon before the word "Category", e.g. change
[[Category:Living people]]
to[[:Category:Living people]]
, or by using the {{Draft categories}} template. - policy on where non-free media is allowed. Any desired non-free content should be added to the article once it has been moved to the mainspace.
Moving drafts to mainspace
Putting the article in the
An article created in draftspace does not belong to the editor who created it, and any other user may edit, move, rename, redirect, merge or seek deletion of any draft.[note 4]
Moving articles to draftspace
The aim of moving an article to draft is to allow time and space for the draft's improvement until it is ready for mainspace. It is not intended as a backdoor route to deletion. As a matter of good practice, the editor moving a page to draft should mark its talk page with the tags of any relevant projects as a means of soliciting improvements from interested editors. {{uw-articletodraft}} may be used on the creator's talk page to notify them.
As a result of a deletion discussion
Articles may be moved to become a draft as a result of a
During new page review
The community has also allowed for new articles to be moved to draft space as an alternative to deletion. Below are a set of best practices to follow when draftifying an article in these circumstances. As part of the review of new pages, an unreviewed page may be moved to draft if:
- the topic has some potential merit, and
- the article does not meet the required standard, and
- there is no evidence of active improvement (at least one hour since the last constructive edit), and
- the article does not contain copyright violations.
- or when the author clearly has a conflict of interest (per WP:COIEDIT).
Expanding on the above:
Has some merit
- 1a. for example, the topic is plausibly notable (if not, it should be speedy-deleted under AfD; do not draftify junk).
Does not meet the required standard
- 2a. The page is obviously unready for mainspace, for example:
- 2a-i. is not a reasonable WP:STUB (e.g. has very little verifiable information, or is interchangeable with a short dictionary entry, but the definition is not good);
- 2a-ii. or it would have very little chance of survival at AfD;
- 2a-iii. or it meets any speedy deletion criterion.
- 2a-i. is not a reasonable
- 2b. The topic appears unimportant, is possibly not worth the effort of fixing, and no great loss if deleted due to expiring in draftspace.
- 2c. The topic is not a new topic likely to be of interest to multiple people (such as current affairs topics).
- 2d. The page is a recent creation by an inexperienced editor. Older articles should not be draftified. As a rule of thumb, articles older than 90 days should not be draftified without prior consensus at AfD or another suitable venue.[note 5]
No evidence of active improvement
- 3a. There is no evidence of a user actively working on it. Wait at least an hour after the last constructive edit to see if the page is likely to be expanded in the immediate future.
- 3b. There is no assertion that the page belongs in mainspace, such as a clear statement to that effect in the edit history, or on the talk page, or a revert of a previous draftification.
Does not contain copyright violations
- 4a. Articles with copyright violations must be addressed, and may not be moved to any namespace.
When the author clearly has a conflict of interest
- 5a. The article has some merit but is written with a promotional tone that makes it clear that the author has a conflict of interest with the topic (exclusively promotional articles should instead be tagged with G11).
- 5b. Whenever this is done, the draftifier must inform the author that COI editors should submit new articles through WP:COIEDIT).
Requirements for draftifying editors
To unilaterally move an article to draft space, you should:
- notify the author (this is facilitated by the selectable list of messages in the script at User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft)
- be accountable for your draftification decisions per the standard described at Wikipedia:Administrators § Accountability (even if you are not an administrator)
Objections
Other editors, including the author of the page, but excluding editors with a conflict of interest, have a right to object to draftifying the page. If an editor raises an objection, move the page back to mainspace and, if necessary, list it at AfD.
A page may only be moved unilaterally to the draftspace a single time. If anyone objects, it is no longer an uncontroversial move, and the page needs to be handled through other processes, such as deletion, stubbing, tagging, etc.
Draftifying during deletion discussions
Draftifying during an AfD should preferably be avoided. The AfD
While there is no prohibition against moving an article while an AfD or deletion review discussion is in progress, editors considering doing so should realize such a move can confuse the discussion greatly, can preempt a closing decision, can make the discussion difficult to track, and can lead to inconsistencies when using semi-automated closing scripts.
Tools for moving articles to draft space
- The recommended tool for moving articles to draft space is page moveruser-right (which allows moving without leaving a redirect). It has a list of selectable default messages for the creator and a field for adding additional comments. It also links the creator to a help page. This new tool, rolled out in December 2022, replaces a former tool that is no longer maintained.
- Another option is to use User:Mr. Stradivarius/gadgets/Draftify
Deleting a draft
Drafts are meant to be works in progress, and most will not meet Wikipedia's standards for quality at first.
Speedy deletion
The
Miscellany for deletion
Drafts are not subject to article deletion criteria like "no context", "no indication of importance", or "not in English" so creators have time to e.g. establish context or notability, translate, and make other adjustments and improvements. Drafts may be nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (MfD), but not solely because the draft fails to show that the notability guidelines are satisfied. A draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy. Substantial leeway is given to drafts; however, the community may decide to delete a draft via MfD if it is determined that the reasons for deletion are strong.[note 6]
Deletion of old drafts
Drafts that have not been edited in six months may be deleted under criterion for speedy deletion
Promising drafts
Drafts may be tagged with {{
Redirects from drafts moved to mainspace
Redirects that are a result of page moves from the draft namespace to the
See also
- Request for Comment for the new namespace on the Village pump (proposals)
- Wikipedia:Do not use draftspace, an essay
- Wikipedia:Mbabel - article draft generating tool for Wikipedia based on Wikidata
- Wikipedia:Workpages
- Wikipedia:Article wizard
Notes
- ^ Including disambiguation pages; very rarely, new pages for non-article namespaces such as the Portal:, Template: and Wikipedia: namespaces are first incubated in the draftspace.
- ^ After six months have elapsed since its last substantive edit, the draft becomes eligible for deletion. See § Deletion of old drafts.
- robots.txtconvention might still index drafts.
- ^ Wikipedia's editing policy applies to all pages, including drafts.
- ^ Discussed in Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Proposal to ban draftifying articles more than 90 days old without consensus.
- ^ It was determined in this RfC regarding the applicability of Wikipedia:Notability to drafts in the userspace or draftspace that "notability guidelines do not apply to userspace and draftspace drafts." A later RfC added a clause allowing the consideration of notability in cases when drafts are repeatedly submitted and declined without improvement.
- G13 speedy nomination, superseding a previous discussion.
- ^ It was determined that the community consensus in this RfC regarding draft namespace redirects amounted to "there is a clear consensus against deletion of draft namespace redirects. There is a rough consensus against the alternative proposal to delete draft namespace redirects after six months."
Learn more
- See the technical requirements and future development ideas on MediaWiki.org