Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Paço Imperial

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2023 at 01:45:20 (UTC)

Support as nominator – Vinícius O. (talk) 01:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Clearly not FP standard - chromatic aberration, out of focus, perspective distortion. MER-C 10:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - That Nikon 16-35 mm lens is known for having poor edge sharpness at 16 mm, see [1]. Wide-angle zooms can't reach the image quality of fixed-focal-length WA lenses. --Janke | Talk 11:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is your ninth open nomination. Far too many I think Vinícius O.. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:37, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're right Vinícius O. (talk) 22:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per MER-C – Choliamb (talk) 19:26, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretfully Oppose due to the expressed optical flaws (chromatic aberration and out of focus on the edges, especially on the left side). Otherwise, it would have been a very nice shot with favourable lighting for both the imperial building and the skyscraper. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 11:16, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]