Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/September-2021

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guernsey by Sentinel-2

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2021 at 16:15:26 (UTC)

Reason

Good capture

Articles in which this image appears

Guernsey

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking back

Creator

Sentinel-2, ESA

• Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 16:15, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Andrei (talk) 16:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - DreamSparrow ^Chat 17:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.--
  here! 17:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Mother of God Trenousa (17-18. century)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2021 at 10:04:23 (UTC)

Reason

quality photo of Icon/painting Mother of God, as seen in Eastern Orthodox art

Articles in which this image appears

National Museum of Serbia, Theotokos

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

unknown artist

• Support as nominator – Petar Milošević (talk) 10:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Unfortunately doesn't add "significant encyclopedic value to an article". Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I just saw we dont have one single painting (icon) of Theotokos (Mother of God) as FP. This one is perfect to improve that, and to dismis your statement talk, so i add her icon to Theoktos too. --Petar Milošević (talk) 16:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you add it now, wait for a month. And why is it special or representative? --Andrei (talk) 16:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Per Charlesjsharp, Oppose. It could work in Serbian Iconography School or something more specific. --Andrei (talk) 16:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Andrei i am not so sure it is Serbian Iconography School, i think it is Greek Kretan school, i see Latin lines here. --Petar Milošević (talk) 12:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• So, you see, this is the main problem. We know nothing about it. If it's available on the museum website with a description (or maybe you took a photo of the description in the museum), at least we could add something to the file description. Otherwise, it is a good photo and it is featured on Commons (where things are valued only from a technical/artistic point of view). --Andrei (talk) 12:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I do add those description i see, just they dont add much or they cant add since not much is known. --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Isambard Kingdom Brunel Standing Before the Launching Chains of the Great Eastern

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2021 at 19:08:30 (UTC)

Reason

One of the most iconic photographs of the industrial era, this work by

Raising the flag on Iwo Jima (if not nearly as serious in subject matter). I was surprised this wasn't already an FP, so if it is do let me know; likewise if there is a better-quality version available on the wiki.  – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 19:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Articles in which this image appears

Isambard Kingdom Brunel Standing Before the Launching Chains of the Great Eastern

FP category for this image

WP:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water or WP:Featured pictures/History/Others

Creator

Crisco 1492 Robert Howlett

• Support as nominator –  – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 19:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. This would be a worthy image for FPC, but it needs restoration first. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously doubt that Crisco – formerly very active here – 'created' this 150-year-old photo. – Sca (talk) 12:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Red-browed Finch

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2021 at 18:27:47 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Red-browed Finch, Estrildidae, Neochmia

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

JJ Harrison

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:27, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:42, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Of course Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 12:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.--
  here! 17:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support --Andrei (talk) 17:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 11:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Red-browed Finch - Penrith.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Picea omorika cone

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2021 at 18:41:51 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC earlier this year, where it was featured nearly unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Picea omorika

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Others

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:41, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support DreamSparrow ^Chat 12:22, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.--
  here! 17:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 11:37, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Picea omorika young female cone - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oak Park, California

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2021 at 17:13:26 (UTC)

Reason

Good composition

Articles in which this image appears

Oak Park, California

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Others

Creator

King of Hearts

• Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:13, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose This might add EV to a rock arch article, but is not specially encyclopaedic for the Oak Park. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Well, it's not a park that shows throught the arch, but a community called Oak Park. A bit more EV in that way... :-) But unfortunately, the community is a bit overexposed. Back to RAW for a "locality edit"? --Janke | Talk 09:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Composition seems rather gimmicky to me. – Sca (talk) 13:35, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Charlesjsharp. No need for rock arch border of photo of town. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:54, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per Commons nomination page.
  Talk 08:38, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:22, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump photo op at St. John's Church

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2021 at 10:48:09 (UTC)

Reason

Good quality (official source, so no better is available). EV is represented by the number of articles where it appears. The photo is, basically, the main subject of the article. It happened a year ago, so no hype.

Articles in which this image appears

Donald Trump photo op at St. John's Church, George Floyd protests in Washington, D.C., Religion and authoritarianism, St. John's Episcopal Church, Lafayette Square, Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election (January–October 2020), Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency (2020 Q2)

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History

Creator

Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead

• Support as nominator – Andrei (talk) 10:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - Overexposed, whites clipped. --Janke | Talk 12:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Sign out of focus (DOF). EV minimal. – Sca (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Beautiful picture with significant historic value. --Gnosis (talk) 06:31, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak support It says a lot about the utter incompetence of this incident that the photographer messed up the exposure and/or DOF on what was obviously a pre-planned photo op. Technically this isn't great, but as noted in the nomination statement the EV is very strong. If this passes it shouldn't go on the front page, for fairly obvious reasons. Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree, no main page --Andrei (talk) 16:09, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  On further consideration, I'm moving to full support on the grounds of a) EV being strong (as noted in the nomination statement, this incident which was a significant element of Trump's presidency was undertaken to obtain this photo) and b) the technical problems with the photo telling an interesting story in their own right - it seems that the photographer emphasised Trump at the expense of everything else in the frame, and the article on her notes that this was in line with the instructions Trump provided her with for her work. In short, it's a historically significant photo that forms a good illustration of how Trump wanted to be presented, even when it was obviously not a good idea. Nick-D (talk) 10:23, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  I do not want to do much research here, but there are numerous articles online that highlight how and why, after remarkable work done by Pete Souza, Trump's administration was making characteristically bad photos. Almost all of them are low quality, badly composed, not personal, taken from a distance, they also often used mobile phones to document even the most significant events. --Andrei (talk) 12:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 11:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – The image has EV for this one time event, but we feature one or two photos of any given person and this photo doesn't rise to the top IMO. Also his legacy is very much in flux (unsettled), he might become president again, I think it's too soon to have a FP of him. Bammesk (talk) 01:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Commonists (talk) 20:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I struck this vote. Editor has less than 100 edits. See instructions on top of This page. Bammesk (talk) 00:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 09:38, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. --Gnosis (talk) 17:37, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  I struck this vote because it was cast after the voting period expired and it's also a duplicate (see above). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• There is no consensus to promote this image. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:22, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grey crowned crane portrait

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2021 at 14:37:55 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. National Bird of Uganda. FP on Commons

Articles in which this image appears

Grey crowned crane

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Thirty or so more pixels at the top, please... --Janke | Talk 16:25, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long-crested eagle

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2021 at 14:29:45 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. FP on Commons

Articles in which this image appears

Long-crested eagle

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:29, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 11:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.
  Talk 08:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:25, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Long-crested eagle (Lophaetus occipitalis) 3.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pole vault

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2021 at 18:35:58 (UTC)

Reason

Quality images show the technique and subject of the article. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Pole vault

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Sport

Creator

Marie-Lan Nguyen

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 18:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I think better technique from a leading polevaulter is needed for EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:35, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:53, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clouds like combed cotton in autumn

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2021 at 14:16:00 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image. Clouds like combed cotton in autumn in Bangladesh. But not FP on commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Autumn

Creator

Tajwar.thesuperman

• Support as nominator –
  talk
  ) 13 September 2021 (UTC)
• Oppose - unremarkable image which does not add any significant encyclopedic value to the article it is used in -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Tilted, unsharp phone-camera snapshot, no EV. --Janke | Talk 18:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Hi. I see you are new to Wikipedia. Do please study the FP guidelines and take a look at images that have been promoted. I suggest you start at Quality Images on Commons - where this image would struggle. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Per Charlesjsharp – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Common cuttlefish

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2021 at 18:28:13 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last week, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Common cuttlefish

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Molluscs

Creator

Diego Delso

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:28, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – background is noisy, but underwater photos aren't easy. (struck per Poco² below) Bammesk (talk) 00:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Yes and I have no frame of reference for the quality of underwater shots. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Bammesk, Charlesjsharp, I've denoised the background a bit and removed some spots. For what I can judge this image is pretty sharp and this species is quite shy and quick, so I do believe that this is an extraordinary shot with high encyclopedic value --Poco² 14:08, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Benefit of the doubt! Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:24, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Better now. --Janke | Talk 15:17, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:26, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.--
  here! 15:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support --Tagooty (talk) 03:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sepia común (Sepia officinalis), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2020-07-21, DD 62.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 22:57, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cleora cinctaria catepillar

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2021 at 18:31:27 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Cleora cinctaria

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator – MER-C 18:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Creepy! ;-) – Sca (talk) 12:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'm not against this, but not sure that such a plain-looking caterpillar adds EV to such a short article. 15:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Who? – Sca (talk) 13:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC) [reply]

That was Charlesjsharp's unsigned edit - just "view history" ;-) --Janke | Talk 13:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• It does because it shows that the caterpillar is plain-looking. MER-C 10:29, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco de Goya - Escena de Inquisicion

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2021 at 08:35:04 (UTC)

Reason

FP on Commons. I think that the particular historic value of this piece is due in large part to the late date in which it was produced. I think when most people think of the Inquisition they think of it in terms of the late medieval period, with the name of 15th century Grand Inquisitor Tomás de Torquemada becoming almost synonymous with the Spanish one (and little mention is made in popular culture of the Mexican or Portuguese ones). An artwork depicting contemporary trials in the 19th century, barely a few decades before Spain entered the industrial age, is in my opinion of high value as it dispels this distorted notion of the institution.

Articles in which this image appears

La Maja desnuda

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Francisco de Goya

• Support as nominator –
  Talk 08:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support Well used. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – prefer unrevised original upload. Bammesk (talk) 00:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.--
  here! 15:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:55, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Francisco de Goya - Escena de Inquisición - Google Art Project.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:05, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lyndon Johnson Richard Nixon 1968

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2021 at 08:56:51 (UTC)

Reason

Historical value, included in a number of GAs and one FA.

Articles in which this image appears

Lyndon B. Johnson, Presidency of Lyndon B. Johnson, Presidential transition of Richard Nixon, Richard Nixon, Richard Nixon 1968 presidential campaign

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History

Creator

Yoichi Okamoto

• Support as nominator –
  Talk 08:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – A high quality image of great historic value. Two American presidents "peacefully discussing". (This image is on my talk page since a month) – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Historical interest, but the composition is not to my taste. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose – Gimmicky composition, dominated by back of chair. – Sca (talk) 12:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I actually believe the back of the chair adds to the composition. Not only does the top create a sort of straight line-of-sight between the two, but the darkness of the chair creates a separation which illustrates both the divide between the two politicians and the tenseness of the situation. The divide reminds me of Vier Apostel (see below)
  Talk 21:06, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  

• Oppose per Sca above. --Janke | Talk 20:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose as above comments. --Petar Milošević (talk) 07:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:10, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JFK limousine

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2021 at 10:13:25 (UTC)

Reason

Historic value, included in various articles.

Articles in which this image appears

Assassination of John F. Kennedy, List of United States presidential assassination attempts and plots, Dallas, Assassination, 1964 United States presidential election, John Connally, etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/USA History

Creator

Walt Cisco

• Support as nominator, feel free to suggest any possible crop – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:13, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – Obviously this photo has been extant for over half a century. New EV not apparent. – Sca (talk) 12:42, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Sca – The encyclopedic value of the image can be justified as it strongly contributed to the article "Assassination of John F. Kennedy", and is used in various other articles. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:52, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Hugely historical, but otherwise not FP. There are better restored versions online. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Charles, what other better restored versions? Do you have links? Bammesk (talk) 01:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I Googled and found it on a fine art site. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Charles, I googled it too but didn't find anything better. Can you give us a url link to what you found? Bammesk (talk) 01:13, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• [1] Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• That's not a better version. It's contrasty and oversaturated. Bammesk (talk) 00:24, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – Technically subpar even for the period: jumbled spot news pic that fails to focus on the star of the parade. – Sca (talk) 12:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Historic. At that kind you dont crop. --Petar Milošević (talk) 07:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – per Petar. Bammesk (talk) 14:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:29, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.--
  here! 15:51, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support. --Gnosis (talk) 17:38, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:JFK limousine.png --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pashupatinath Temple

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2021 at 11:22:09 (UTC)

Reason

Quality Img

Articles in which this image appears

Kathmandu, Pashupatinath Temple

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Religion and mythology

Creator

Bijay Chaurasia

• Support as nominator –
  talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 11:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

This is the close as you can get to the temple. As you can't take your camera on the premises of the temple.

talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 11:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Comment – Alas, jumbled composition doesn't really illustrate the subject. – Sca (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Not FP-worthy, fails criteria 3 & 5. --Janke | Talk 13:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@

talk • श्रीमान् गम्भीर) 13:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

• Comment – I agree the composition is muddled. This wide-angle photo: [2] shows more of the temple and has a more interesting composition (it's technical quality is lacking though). Bammesk (talk) 00:20, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:45, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Barrel roll

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2021 at 17:23:23 (UTC)

Reason

High quality, encyclopedic, FV on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Barrel roll

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Air

Creator

kallerna

• Support as nominator —kallerna 17:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – the file description can be better (FP criterion 7), things like country, air show or air team if any, airplane type if known. It can also say: a counterclockwise roll followed by a clockwise roll. Bammesk (talk) 00:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• I added a better description, thanks. —kallerna 04:49, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose – Gimmicky composition, scant EV. – Sca (talk) 12:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose not best illustrated from the aircraft itself. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose The video does not convey a clear message. Taken from another aircraft or a fixed point would be better, IMO. --Tagooty (talk) 03:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support I see no reason why a third-person view is necessarily preferable to a first-person view here. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:53, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mediterranean red sea star

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2021 at 10:36:35 (UTC)

Reason

Recently featured on Commons, high EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Echinaster sepositus

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Echinoderms

Creator

Diego Delso

• Support as nominator – MER-C 10:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:24, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.--
  here! 15:51, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 15:59 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Promoted File:Estrella roja del Mediterráneo (Echinaster sepositus), Parque natural de la Arrábida, Portugal, 2020-07-31, DD 79.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:29, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Petasites hybridus

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2021 at 10:39:20 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Petasites hybridus, Petasites

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator – MER-C 10:39, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 14:30, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.--
  here! 15:50, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 15:57, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Tagooty (talk) 03:27, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Petasites hybridus inflorescence - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Landscape with the Good Samaritan

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2021 at 12:35:56 (UTC)

Reason

High resolution. High quality. FP on Commons

Articles in which this image appears

Landscape with the Good Samaritan, Rembrandt, List of paintings by Rembrandt, Czartoryski Museum, Rembrandt catalogue raisonné, 1908, Rembrandt catalogue raisonné, 1935, Rembrandt catalogue raisonné, 1968, Rembrandt catalogue raisonné, 1986

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Rembrandt

• Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 12:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 15:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Support.--
  here! 15:50, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Promoted File:Landscape with the Good Samaritan - Rembrandt.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stańczyk by Jan Matejko

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2021 at 13:31:25 (UTC)

Reason

gorgeous composition, historical value, see Stańczyk_(painting)#History,_significance_and_historiography

Articles in which this image appears

Stańczyk, History painting, Culture of Poland, Polish art, Jan Matejko, Wise fool, Jester, Stańczyk (painting),

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings

Creator

Jan Matejko, uploaded by Gytha

• Support as nominator –
  Talk 13:31, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Oppose as is. We have a FP of this painting Here. The nom version has higher resolution, so a delist and replace nom might succeed. Also the left edge needs to be cropped out. Bammesk (talk) 14:16, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Talk 20:21, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Famous painting, but even "higher resolution" isnt croped as it could be. --Petar Milošević (talk) 08:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]