Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/September-2022

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:52, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SBB Red Arrow

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2022 at 13:51:44 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image of a Red Arrow railcar and a panoramic view of Schaffhausen and Feuerthalen in Switzerland; good EV and a Commons FP.

Articles in which this image appears

Red Arrow (Swiss train), Feuerthalen, Schaffhausen

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Land

Creator

David Gubler

• Support as nominator – —Bruce1ee^talk 13:51, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – shows the train and the town. Bammesk (talk) 14:16, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Should be in infobox for some days then good nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've moved the picture into Feuerthalen's infobox. —Bruce1ee^talk 17:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Oppose As a train image it's not as close as I'd prefer --Muhammad(talk) 08:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree. -- Sca (talk) 12:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose per Muhammad. —
  PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 13:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 16:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Structures of phospholipids in aqueous solution

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2022 at 22:34:55 (UTC)

Reason

This artwork by LadyofHats provides an incredibly detailed yet concise visualization of the three simplest structures adoptable by phospholipid (bi)layers in an aqueous environment. Phospholipid arrangement is at the foundation of biological study and this image gives a great geometric explanation of why cell and organelle membranes form the structures they do.

Articles in which this image appears

Biological membrane, Lipid bilayer, Lipid, Chemical polarity, Micelle, Macromolecular assembly, Lipid polymorphism, Lipid bilayer mechanics.

FP category for this image

Diagrams

Creator

LadyofHats

• Support as nominator – RFZYNSPY ^talk 22:34, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Leaning to support but I like to see a title (or note) on the image itself, something like "Phospholipids in aqueous solution", to make it more complete as a stand-alone image. Bammesk (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  That's what image captions are for. The advantage of having that sort of text as a caption rather than embedded in the image is that you can adapt the caption to the context rather than forcing the same caption to work for all the different articles the image appears in. Do you demand captions embedded as pixels in the photos nominated here? —David Eppstein (talk) 19:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Diagrams and sketches aren't photos, so no. But I agree with the adaptive use argument. Bammesk (talk) 00:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment – Niche interest only. – Sca (talk) 12:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Support This is basic cellular biology. It's the basis for the cell membrane and everything related to it, such as several means of transport into and out of the cell.

  FPs 17:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  IMO, cellular biology is a niche subject. -- Sca (talk) 12:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  So are specific bird species and operas. Things taught in high school are less niche.

  FPs 17:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

  ]

  Birds in general are a niche in photography. -- Sca (talk) 12:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  And yet we promote them all the time.

  FPs 16:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Support. We should support encyclopedic and well-rendered diagrammatic content in FPC, not just pretty snapshots of charismatic megafauna and postcard views. This is a high-quality example of this type of image, well illustrates an important distinction in biological membrane structures, and is used prominently to do so in multiple articles (among which Lipid is listed as vital, Lipid bilayer both vital and Good Article, and Micelle is high-importance for biology). It is not easy to make these kinds of images both stylized enough to focus on the important aspects of the topic and to render the three-dimensional shape accurately enough for it to immediately stand out to the reader, and the creator of this image has done an excellent job of exactly that. Of note, it is in a vector rather than raster format, making it more widely reusable (for instance, it would be very easy to change the embedded text, unlike in a photographic image with overlaid and pixelated text). LadyofHats has many good diagrams (I had recent occasion to use File:Wine grape diagram en.svg off-wiki, for instance) and I think we should feature more images like this. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – per David and Adam. I like to see more nominations like this as well. Bammesk (talk) 00:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support —
  PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 13:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Promoted File:Phospholipids aqueous solution structures.svg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Princess Elizabeth running an ambulence in the Second World War

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2022 at 16:06:41 (UTC)

Reason

I think it's a fine historical image. If it's passing on the 16th, I'll open a discussion on an

IAR POTD for the queen's funeral. (Edit: I opened it on Talk:Main Page

already, so that there's as much time as possible to talk things over.

Articles in which this image appears

Loads of articles. Offhand, Women in World War II, Women in the World Wars, British Army during the Second World War, Elizabeth II, etc.

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Royalty and nobility

Creator

Ministry of Information official photographer, restored by Angerey

• Support as nominator –
  FPs 16:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support In the circumstances. Strong support POTD for day of funeral. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Very appropriate and a good candidate for POTD. —Bruce1ee^talk 17:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 17:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support given the quality of the historical photo. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 18:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support High quality photo, on high quality articles. Sea Cow (talk) 18:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 19:15, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I suppose cropping is out of the question. Tempting though, portrait orientation with the princess central. ProfDEH (talk) 17:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• FWIW, Template:CSS image crop can be used to custom-crop the image in any article(s). Bammesk (talk) 01:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Hrh Princess Elizabeth in the Auxiliary Territorial Service, April 1945 TR2832.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• IMO the image fits better in History/World War II. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eurasian coot with chicks

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2022 at 16:18:58 (UTC)

Reason

High quality image. FP on Commons. Not in infobox but high EV.

Articles in which this image appears

Eurasian coot

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Slightly off focus, but it's an action shot.
  FPs 01:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Oppose Not a fan of the lighting --Muhammad(talk) 08:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose dislike composition and lighting —
  PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 13:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:31, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Female Eurasian brown bear

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2022 at 16:45:17 (UTC)

Reason

High quality large image of animal in the wild. Illustrates article well. FP on Commons

Articles in which this image appears

Eurasian brown bear Brown bear

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals

Creator

Charlesjsharp

• Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support - Good EV. —Bruce1ee^talk 17:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 19:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support
  FPs 02:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support Nice dynamic shot --Muhammad(talk) 08:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Awesome. —
  PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 13:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Promoted File:Eurasian brown bear (Ursus arctos arctos) female 1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:33, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jal Mahal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2022 at 01:08:19 (UTC)

Reason

Quality image of this palace. FP on Commons.

Articles in which this image appears

Jal Mahal, Jaipur, +2

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

Creator

A.Savin

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 01:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --A.Savin (talk) 00:16, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Yann (talk) 21:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• It seems a little grainy and out of focus.
  FPs 16:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Yes, it's a judgment call. I don't think it is misfocused though. I think it's shot handheld in low light. A tripod would have allowed f/8 and a sharper image. Bammesk (talk) 01:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm going to vote "Neutral", as I think it's a good picture, but the artistic choices, while pretty at lower resolution, do substantially affect it at full resolution.

FPs 02:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

• Weak Oppose The sky is distractingly grainy, even at full-size on my 1080p monitor. —
  PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 13:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support Tomer T (talk) 20:07, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:45, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Le roi d'Ys

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2022 at 17:00:23 (UTC)

Reason

While one could criticise some aspects: the way the poster raises up its lower right corner to accommodate the attribution onto the plate is a little awkward - it's still from the opera's première, and that makes it valuable. An annoying bastard of a poster to clean up - loads of micro-tears and filthy border paper, but I think I did a good job.

Was seen on Commons today and no-one's voted oppose yet! ...Or support. It's early.

Articles in which this image appears

Le roi d'Ys, Édouard Lalo, Ys, List of compositions by Édouard Lalo

FP category for this image

WP:FP/THEATRE

Creator

Auguste François-Marie Gorguet, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator –
  FPs 17:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – Yann (talk) 21:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 01:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Tomer T (talk) 20:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Auguste François-Marie Gorguet - poster for the première performance of Édouard Lalo's Le roi d'Ys (1888).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:44, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hoher Göll

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2022 at 19:22:04 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Hoher Göll

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes

Creator

Jörg Braukmamm

• Support as nominator – MER-C 19:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment – At 220 words, target article seems rather stubby. – Sca (talk) 12:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Good. – Yann (talk) 21:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support An excellent photo, article is short, but, given the subject, not excessively so. Sits in the midst of a constellation of articles that cover subsidiary subjects, e.g.
  FPs 01:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support Tomer T (talk) 20:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – EV, good in-article depiction. Bammesk (talk) 01:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Göll (Westseite).jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bultfonteinite

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2022 at 19:26:49 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC two weeks ago, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Bultfonteinite

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator – MER-C 19:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support —Bruce1ee^talk 22:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support
  FPs 16:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Bultfonteinite - Linxi, Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia, China.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tabula Rogeriana

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2022 at 21:07:37 (UTC)

Reason

rare old document, very high resolution, used on 12 articles or pages

Articles in which this image appears

Geography and cartography in medieval Islam, Siculo-Arabic, Islamic world contributions to Medieval Europe, Đại Việt

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps/Maps

Creator

Konrad Miller (1844-1933), uploaded by User:Skimel

• Comment There is another version, much less used: File:Tabula Rogeriana 1929 copy by Konrad Miller.jpg
• Support as nominator – Yann (talk) 21:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• If the original wasn't North-up, I don't think we should rotate it just because.
  FPs 21:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – prefer un-rotated version [2]. Bammesk (talk) 00:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: This it not the original map by Al-Idrisi, but a 20th century copy by Konrad Miller. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skimel (talk • contribs)
  • I don't mind that entirely, though the original would have been preferred. Although that said... 1929? ...How is this out of copyright in the US?
    FPs 16:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• We actually do have the original, but some assembly required, as well as a 19th century assembly of the map that keeps the Arabic labels. Also [3].
  FPs 16:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  @Adam Cuerden thanks for the links, that's very interesting. This makes me wonder if the whole map has ever been done by Al-Idrisi, or if it is a modern recreation. Skimel (talk) 10:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Currently nominated for deletion on Commons. MER-C 10:38, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• I would greatly prefer one of the source documents (themselves copies, but at a step less removed) used by Miller. I think the latin captions and redrawing are likely to mislead readers about the content of the original. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:34, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet submarine B-515

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2022 at 09:05:15 (UTC)

Reason

Good EV and high quality

Articles in which this image appears

Soviet submarine B-515

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water

Creator

User:Tim Rademacher

• Support as nominator – Tomer T (talk) 09:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• There's a couple blue specks at the top of the image, otherwise really good. Support
  FPs 16:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:44, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Ivar (talk) 04:41, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:2020-09-16 165855 Soviet submarine B-515.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:09, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cox and Box redux

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2022 at 16:39:46 (UTC)

Reason

Pretty sure the last nomination - which wasn't opposed but failed to reach quorum - was just unlucky as to timing. I've had bad luck this year with that. It's probably the best known of the Royal Gallery of Illustration pieces by far, still quite frequently performed to this day and with modern professional recordings and performances. Passed Commons unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Cox and Box, Royal Gallery of Illustration, Alfred Concanen

FP category for this image

WP:FP/THEATRE

Creator

Alfred Concanen, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator –
  FPs 16:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:48, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Tomer T (talk) 20:09, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Ivar (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Poster for Burnand and Sullivan's Cox and Box - Royal Gallery of Illustration.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Juniper berry

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2022 at 10:52:59 (UTC)

Reason

Currently unopposed on Commons FPC, illustrates subject well.

Articles in which this image appears

Juniper berry, Juniperus communis, Arctodus

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Fruits

Creator

Ivar Leidus

• Support as nominator – MER-C 10:52, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support —
  PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 13:02, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:03, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Very good macro photography. I'm presuming the coppery tone on them is natural.
  FPs 01:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • I'd say it's because of the lighting - a bit unnatural since it is coming from below - maybe reflection from yellow or orange ground? We have a juniper bush in the yard, and there's nothing "coppery" in their berries... OTOH the other picture of berries shows an unnatural purple coloring - the correct color is a dark, slightly greyish and muted, but pure blue, as seen only on the top of the berries in this FPC. If the photographer can be persuaded to do some color balancing, I would support. (BTW, as the berries mature, their color changes from green to pink, then to purplish, and finally to greyed blue.) --Janke | Talk 15:45, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support --Ivar (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose Unnatural lighting, both tone and direction. This is more like art than information. ProfDEH (talk) 09:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @

  FPs 23:58, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• Oppose since no edit yet made to color balance. --Janke | Talk 21:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support -- Color corrected version 2022-09-26. --Janke | Talk 18:21, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Juniperus communis fruits - Keila.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Platygyra daedalea

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2022 at 11:12:32 (UTC)

Reason

Was seen on Commons FPC last month, where it was featured unanimously.

Articles in which this image appears

Platygyra daedalea

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Cnidaria

Creator

Diego Delso

• Support as nominator – MER-C 11:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Meets my requirements for underwater shots.
  FPs 01:44, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 13:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poster for the Seventh Conference of the International Woman Suffrage Alliance

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2022 at 16:28:41 (UTC)

Reason

I think the cleanup went great, despite an imperfect scan. Poster is your typical blocky woodblock or silkscreen print of the time, and you can see slight imperfections on the black border where it didn't quite reach the paper (it's cropped to the edge of the paper, somewhat by necessity as the scan is on some sides). Historical value is what really pushes this into valuable and featurable; this is the kind of artefact that you're surprised still exists.

Articles in which this image appears

Seventh Conference of the International Woman Suffrage Alliance

FP category for this image

Since it's valuable more for history than as artwork, Wikipedia:Featured pictures/History/Others

Creator

Anna Soós Korànyi, restored by Adam Cuerden

• Support as nominator –
  FPs 16:28, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support. Significant encyclopedic use as illustration for its article; good quality resto (as always). —David Eppstein (talk) 16:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support – Bammesk (talk) 00:08, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 18:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support TheFreeWorld (talk) 12:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Poster by Anna Soós Korànyi for the Seventh Conference of the International Woman Suffrage Alliance.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Point Arena Light

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2022 at 00:22:39 (UTC)

Reason

Quality image of this lighthouse. A California historical landmark and part of the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.

Articles in which this image appears

Point Arena Light

FP category for this image

Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Others

Creator

Frank Schulenburg

• Support as nominator – Bammesk (talk) 00:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. High quality, scenic, and sets the context well, despite not really conveying just how long it takes to walk up all of those stairs, nor the contrast between the huge glass fresnel lens one finds at the top next to the small electric lamp that replaced it. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:30, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Wouldn't mind more pixels dedicated to the lighthouse itself, but the wider view gives important context, and there's always a chance for more images that zoom in, as it were.
  FPs 05:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support --Petar Milošević (talk) 15:28, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. MER-C 10:52, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Point Arena Lighthouse, Mendocino County.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 04:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]