Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 August 12

< August 11	August 13 >

August 12

"The Wire" images

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 03:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These non-free images are being used in the infoboxes for episodes of The Wire. The non-free usage rationales do not state a purpose; they just describe the scene. The images's use is decorative, and their removal would not detract from a reader's understanding of the article. Fails

A person in Georgia (talk) 01:44, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Natasha Tsakos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Similar file tagged as own work by another user. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kyle Rittenhouse Kenosha shooting.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus -FASTILY 22:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use appears to violate copyright/non-free use rationale allowances. Non-free use allows transformative uses of what appears to be a copywritten news image. Our use here [1] is effectively as an illustration for a story about the event and thus not transformative. Springee (talk) 03:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The file is used in the infobox about the shooting and there is critical commentary to pass
WP:NFCC. Aspects (talk) 22:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
What critical commentary about the picture? Use in an article about the shooting doesn't apear to transform the work. It's also not commentary about the picture rather it's about the event. It is an appropriate picture for the article but I'm not convinced that gets its around copyright via fair use. Springee (talk) 23:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A picture doesn't need to "transform the work". Illustrating Rittenhouse as he was at the event is significant enough. You can certainly add to the FUR if you wish. Buffs (talk) 16:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So long as it's not a copyright problem I think the picture is appropriate for the article and should stay. My concern relates only to fair use which others are saying isn't a problem. Springee (talk) 18:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well known photo and strongly associated with the shooting and the perpetrator. It is worth noting that deleting this photo will result in the only picture of the perpetrator being one where he is addressing a sympathetic crowd while wearing a nice suit. Protonk (talk) 18:04, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nate Rowlan, wikipedian.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. Out of scope. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:13, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not only for that, it's also extremely poor-quality. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mylogo, asdasd, asda, 2010, adsada.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal file, no obvious use. Out of scope. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:31, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I removed an "empty file" CSD tag because the SVG was not empty. However, this doesn't seem like it belongs in Wikipedia because it looks out of scope like Minorax said. weeklyd3 (block | talk | contributions) 03:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AKIPS Network Monitoring Software Logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded for Draft:AKIPS. No other use. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:90125album.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Superseded by File:90125 album cover.svg on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:51, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as superseded. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:53, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this section.