Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Cannons (house)/assets/include/images/russia.png" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- MOS:IMAGES suggests starting an article with an infobox or lead image in the upper right, it might be better to move one of the two images in the article...13 KB (96,068 words) - 23:36, 29 August 2009
- File:Plan of the Tower House, London.png - Looks okay File:Tower House dining room.jpg - Fine File:BLW Decanter.jpg - Link to the image on Britain Loves Wikipedia...2 KB (110,661 words) - 23:39, 30 April 2015
- trilogy doesn't give a captured cannon total, I didn't see one in vol. 1 of Freeman's Lee's Lieutenants (just says that cannons were taken without saying how...3 KB (235,003 words) - 06:14, 12 November 2021
- this image (File:Leo Fortune-West 3.png), I would include the year that the photo was taken as you have done with the other images in the article. For...3 KB (184,972 words) - 23:38, 31 August 2021
- not above the heading." IMAGE:Ddsmith.png violates this guideline. MOS:IMAGES also says in part, "Do not place left-aligned images directly below a subsection-level...9 KB (124,559 words) - 02:18, 11 February 2016
- (UTC) Reason These are good images of unusual rocks. The images have educational and encyclopedic values. I hope that an image as a FP would "make the...6 KB (70,014 words) - 07:33, 19 March 2024
- (UTC) Image review - All of the images in this article are non-free and none of them have sufficient rationales at this point: Image:AangOzai.png - The...3 KB (115,433 words) - 05:24, 29 December 2008
- old. In the History section, you have used both "cannons" and "cannon" as plural of the word cannon. Thanks for an interesting read. Maralia 19:16, 6...4 KB (100,561 words) - 19:56, 16 December 2007
- passerby comment... I'm skeptical of the way the article currently presents the critical reassessment as if it was more broadly-supported than it really...2 KB (120,405 words) - 16:40, 28 January 2023
- would be a good idea. Finally, once the article has taken shape, extensive copyediting will probably be appropriate. (One minor point: is "Russian Ground...10 KB (82,184 words) - 04:56, 5 October 2009
- soldiers to arms"? "having stocked up several cannons and the firearms " - "having stockpiled several cannons"? "There has been historical controversy about...7 KB (122,763 words) - 00:06, 30 December 2014
- Broadway Bridge image on the left and the infobox on the right. See MOS:SANDWICH, a part of MOS:IMAGES. The Featured Article criteria include the complete...2 KB (125,474 words) - 22:54, 31 March 2022
- context for the article.[?] This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and...12 KB (124,804 words) - 06:09, 27 August 2010
- ext links all work; images appear correctly licenced; images lack alt text, you might consider adding it in (suggestion only); Good point: added is there...9 KB (188,900 words) - 22:49, 25 December 2012
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1063 (category Pages using multiple image with auto scaled images)2021 (UTC) The correct location would be Featured article reassessment, not good article reassessment. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:53...791 KB (106,525 words) - 22:58, 27 September 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive310 (section I am requesting input I am trying to do the right thing and not get banned or start any wars . I am just trying to learn form all the good and bad that happen so I do better)be used in another article. File:ArsenalLFC Twitter logo.png was deleted per WP:F5 because someone removed the file from the article and it became orphaned...697 KB (97,558 words) - 20:57, 17 March 2023
- before.) Happy to support. Good luck, Mike. SusunW (talk) 22:43, 17 July 2023 (UTC) Image review File:DaisyBacon1941.png is missing a full fair-use rationale...2 KB (166,798 words) - 14:40, 31 August 2023
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2013/Promoted (section Russian battleship Retvizan)happened to Hartmann article where the contributor fixed the problem and it was still delisted. Remember, Good article reassessment page says that you need...10 KB (232,133 words) - 19:58, 17 December 2013
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2011/Failed (section Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895))this tank: However memoirs or documentaries are not good A-class sources. The Russian wikipedia article on the tiger tank makes the most sense. It says that...4 KB (105,824 words) - 03:26, 26 September 2013
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1127 (section Good faith ip who lacks competency)you’ve just gone and opened a reassessment on one of my GA reviews quite randomly. Feels like harassment really. Glass houses, stones, etcetera Jack4576...796 KB (103,878 words) - 05:26, 31 July 2023