Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Team Fortress 2/include/images/russia.png" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- don't include the breed name, and should be good. We're already IAR on a couple of images that I didn't change, and calling IAR on 4 out of 5 images is going...3 KB (112,361 words) - 18:43, 6 December 2020
- (talk) 17:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC) Image, deadlink and copvio check Article makes good use of two properly licensed images. No deadlinks. Does the Maple Leafs...2 KB (57,623 words) - 17:48, 24 June 2011
- afternoon, with the Russians suffering heavy casualties. thanks for the suggestion, have taken it up Liko ... divided his fortress in half - did this have...3 KB (135,123 words) - 20:44, 7 November 2020
- (UTC) I've noticed some .gif images in the article. They need to be converted to png. GIFs are only meant for animated images. Secondly, please try and fix...3 KB (104,365 words) - 18:24, 21 April 2009
- MOS:IMAGES suggests starting an article with an infobox or lead image in the upper right, it might be better to move one of the two images in the article...13 KB (96,068 words) - 23:36, 29 August 2009
- "The Russian team captured the bronze medal at this tournament, defeating the United States 4–2 in the final." I'm a little confused, how could Russia win...10 KB (77,380 words) - 20:26, 30 July 2010
- an article I've recently been working on, because it's last assessment was on October 9, 2009. I would ask for one at WP:Good article reassessment, however...400 KB (53,126 words) - 10:59, 7 May 2024
- Broadway Bridge image on the left and the infobox on the right. See MOS:SANDWICH, a part of MOS:IMAGES. The Featured Article criteria include the complete...2 KB (125,474 words) - 22:54, 31 March 2022
- this nomination be archived so the article can be brought to WP:Good article reassessment. TompaDompa (talk) 21:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC) Ok thanks for...1 KB (69,689 words) - 16:25, 30 November 2023
- written the article largely from scratch. Coverage of the topic is good and so is references, images, etc. My concerns are 1. Reference formating 2. Length...17 KB (82,520 words) - 23:46, 14 December 2019
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2015/Promoted (section Russian battleship Oslyabya)patch images should all be updated to include information akin to this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3rd_US_Armored_Division_SSI.png ? Yes...6 KB (127,932 words) - 01:06, 27 December 2015
- relevant articles.[?] This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under...14 KB (145,596 words) - 22:33, 21 May 2008
- would be a good idea. Finally, once the article has taken shape, extensive copyediting will probably be appropriate. (One minor point: is "Russian Ground...10 KB (82,184 words) - 04:56, 5 October 2009
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/2008 (section 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team (United States))context for the article.[?] This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and...12 KB (124,804 words) - 06:09, 27 August 2010
- (talk) 08:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC) Images - the only problematic one is File:2 18th Battalion AIF Unit Colour Patch.PNG which needs a {{PD-ineligible}} or...9 KB (188,923 words) - 22:49, 25 December 2012
- Both images are suitable licensed. Would it be worth adding File:Æthelflæd as depicted in the cartulary of Abingdon Abbey.png to the article? Good work...7 KB (122,763 words) - 00:06, 30 December 2014
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2013/Promoted (section Russian battleship Retvizan)happened to Hartmann article where the contributor fixed the problem and it was still delisted. Remember, Good article reassessment page says that you need...10 KB (232,133 words) - 19:58, 17 December 2013
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2011/Failed (section Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895))this tank: However memoirs or documentaries are not good A-class sources. The Russian wikipedia article on the tiger tank makes the most sense. It says that...4 KB (105,824 words) - 03:26, 26 September 2013
- Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images #10, if no free images are realistically available. Follow the policy language closely, and upload the image here to English Wikipedia...401 KB (55,082 words) - 21:39, 14 May 2024