Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Team Fortress 2/include/images/usa.png" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Media review: Two images. Alt text good for both. File:Achtung Baby.png: Album cover (fair use), used as main infobox image. Usage: Good, standard. Rationale:...4 KB (115,056 words) - 20:24, 30 January 2010
- (UTC) I've noticed some .gif images in the article. They need to be converted to png. GIFs are only meant for animated images. Secondly, please try and fix...3 KB (104,365 words) - 18:24, 21 April 2009
- requirement in WP:MOS#Images. Anyway, none of the images in the article are thumbnails: the thumb tag is simply used to scale down some large images with captions...3 KB (135,123 words) - 20:44, 7 November 2020
- (talk) 17:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC) Image, deadlink and copvio check Article makes good use of two properly licensed images. No deadlinks. Does the Maple Leafs...2 KB (57,623 words) - 17:48, 24 June 2011
- MOS:IMAGES suggests starting an article with an infobox or lead image in the upper right, it might be better to move one of the two images in the article...13 KB (96,068 words) - 23:36, 29 August 2009
- written the article largely from scratch. Coverage of the topic is good and so is references, images, etc. My concerns are 1. Reference formating 2. Length...17 KB (82,520 words) - 23:46, 14 December 2019
- early United States. Ergo Sum 02:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC) Image review. The images are good, the rationales, sources and licensing seem in order. I'm...2 KB (103,894 words) - 21:38, 31 January 2022
- Broadway Bridge image on the left and the infobox on the right. See MOS:SANDWICH, a part of MOS:IMAGES. The Featured Article criteria include the complete...2 KB (125,474 words) - 22:54, 31 March 2022
- this nomination be archived so the article can be brought to WP:Good article reassessment. TompaDompa (talk) 21:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC) Ok thanks for...1 KB (69,689 words) - 16:25, 30 November 2023
- an article I've recently been working on, because it's last assessment was on October 9, 2009. I would ask for one at WP:Good article reassessment, however...400 KB (53,126 words) - 10:59, 7 May 2024
- relevant articles.[?] This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under...14 KB (145,596 words) - 22:33, 21 May 2008
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/2008 (section 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team (United States))context for the article.[?] This article has no images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and...12 KB (124,804 words) - 06:09, 27 August 2010
- patch images should all be updated to include information akin to this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3rd_US_Armored_Division_SSI.png ? Yes...6 KB (127,932 words) - 01:06, 27 December 2015
- this article is ready for peer review. Also, respectfully request a reassessment of the article's quality scale and an assessment of the article's importance...10 KB (82,184 words) - 04:56, 5 October 2009
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2013/Promoted (section No. 2 Operational Conversion Unit RAAF)happened to Hartmann article where the contributor fixed the problem and it was still delisted. Remember, Good article reassessment page says that you need...10 KB (232,133 words) - 19:58, 17 December 2013
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2014/Promoted (section Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles)Both images are suitable licensed. Would it be worth adding File:Æthelflæd as depicted in the cartulary of Abingdon Abbey.png to the article? Good work...7 KB (122,763 words) - 00:06, 30 December 2014
- Prioryman (talk) This article is the first in a series of articles on German V-weapons sites (see also La Coupole and Fortress of Mimoyecques, which I...4 KB (105,824 words) - 03:26, 26 September 2013