Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/November 2019

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This page is an archive and its contents should be preserved in their current form;
any comments regarding this page should be directed to Wikipedia talk:In the news. Thanks.

November 30

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) RD: Mariss Jansons

Article: Mariss Jansons (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Washington Post, NY Times, Deutsche Welle, The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph, The Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
talk) 17:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

November 29

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health and environment
Law and crime
Politics and elections

(Closed) London Bridge attack

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
stabbing attack in London, England, with the attacker shot dead by police. (Post)
News source(s): BBC

Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: Terror attack in London without warning (i.e. intelligence) and resulted in shootings (for reiteration: the police in the UK do not regularly carry tasers, let alone guns, let alone use them) Kingsif (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose relatively small potatoes in the big scheme of "terror" attacks. Sure, it made a few waves, but the Met Police were on the scene in minutes, unarmed members of the British public ran towards the danger to help, and that was that. Tomorrow, London will be the same, stoic and resilient as it has been for decades. RIP the two innocent citizens. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:41, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The police being omnipresent is kind of a hallmark of the UK, and London doesn't often see terror attacks, though. Kingsif (talk) 19:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well we have a lot of police on the streets of London, but then more than 10 million people live there so I guess you'd expect that. And London has had more than its fair share of terror attacks over the past fifty years. It didn't just start after 9/11. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:52, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Nowhere near the scale of what would be a significant attack (like the bridge attack a few years back). --Masem (t) 19:59, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose a routine occurrence in the UK which will continue until meaningful knife control laws are implemented --LaserLegs (talk) 20:01, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure what "knife control laws" means here. It's illegal to carry a knife in the UK, just like it's legal to carry a gun in the US. If this guy had a gun, he'd have killed dozens. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 20:03, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Hey, LaserLegs, perhaps you could make comments about knife control in the Netherlands next? The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 20:11, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Gotta nominate it first. It's just as unlawful to commit gun murder in the USA as it is to commit knife and vehicle murder in the UK but until something is done to control these lethal implements psychotic mass killings with knives and vans (or "lorrys") will continue unabated. It's sad, maybe, but so routine as to not warrant posting on the main page. --LaserLegs (talk) 21:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, I think Black Kite nailed it somewhat below, so I'll let it go here. Your analogy is invalid, as you know, but good luck with getting anyone to buy into it! Ciao! The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 21:59, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Say what? Since when are terrorist attacks a routine occurrence in the UK? 49 TL 20:08, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Regardless of LaserLegs' impressively dimwitted oppose above (UK knife deaths 2018 = 285, US kinfe deaths 2018 = 1,515 ... but US gun deaths 2018 = 39,773), this is probably not rising to the level of ITN. Black Kite (talk) 21:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Mercifully low death toll so not as significant as the 2017 attacks.P-K3 (talk) 23:00, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above with exception to LaserLegs' oppose which is one of the more sillier political statements I've seen on ITN. Nonstopmaximum (talk) 23:33, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Burning Sun scandal

Article: 
unconsented filming and sharing of sexcam videos.
News source(s): Yonhap, BBC

Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Top news. Article well referenced. Sherenk1 (talk) 12:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support This definitely an unique case. Article is very good, and sourced.BabbaQ (talk) 15:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support. Celebrity sex scandals are usually not suitable for ITN, but this does seem to be an unusual case, ties into a wider social issue in South Korea, and has an extremely well-developed article. The article quality tips me over into supporting this. Modest Genius talk 17:42, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support per Modest Genius. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose with respect to those above, the blurb gives no-one any indication of what makes this in any way more notable than any other "celebrity" being sent to prison for any kind of crime. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 19:25, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Expanded blurb to give some context based on what reading the lead of the scandal article suggests. If it's inaccurate, then that's because the lead does not concisely get to the point... Kingsif (talk) 22:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's a fair point. I expected to oppose until I read through. The lead could be cleared. I think that alt blurb is too long. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:44, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, that is significant. You don't see celebrities or white-collar individuals in general get sent to prison nowadays. Even Felicity Huffman, who got convicted of fraud, managed to worm her way out of prison time. WaltCip (talk) 19:42, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Huffman spent a short time in prison. Stephen 21:11, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ten days. WaltCip (talk) 22:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@
Taewangkorea: - I presume you’re from Korea - then you should be aware of #MeToo’s equivalent in Korea, hidden camera sex crimes (including Hara), and the significance of Kpop, all of which this story is tied in to. starship.paint (talk) 23:56, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Comment We posted Bill Cosby found guilty of sexual assault and that South African with no legs who murdered is girlfriend was in the box like a thousand times, so I don't see why we couldn't post this as well. I don't care, so I didn't read it to look for BLP vios, so this is not a support. --LaserLegs (talk) 22:48, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Sca (and we should not have posted Bill Cosby or the South African with no legs who murdered his girlfriend (Oscar Pistorius)). Banedon (talk) 04:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose We should not be posting what is basically tabloid crime news, even if it has garnered some sensationalist coverage. -Ad Orientem (talk) 05:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Ad Orientem. – Ammarpad (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Bagumba.
    Lepricavark (talk) 06:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]

(Posted) RD: Yasuhiro Nakasone

Article: Yasuhiro Nakasone (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Kyoto News & etc.
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Oldest (formerly) living ex-Prime Minister of Japan at 101, and one of the last high ranking pols who was a veteran of the world war. Referencing needs some work but not in dreadful shape. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:32, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

November 28

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) 2019 Uruguayan general election

Proposed image
Article: 
runoff election.
News source(s): Bloomberg, BBC

Credits:

Article needs updating
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 MSN12102001 (talk) 23:16, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

November 27

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections

Science and technology
  • Following a public outcry, Twitter apologises and backtracks one day after saying that it would begin deleting inactive accounts outside the United States on December 11, after users were upset that the measure would cause the removal of accounts belonging to users who had died. It now says that it will first implement a process for "memorialising" dead users. It would have been the first large scale cull of inactive accounts on the social media platform. (BBC News)

Sports

(Posted) RD: Ciputra

Article: Ciputra (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Nikkei Asian Review, Jakarta Post
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Indonesian billionaire and philanthropist. Zanhe (talk) 10:18, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

@
Coffeeandcrumbs for conducting a copyvio check. Cheers, -Zanhe (talk) 21:49, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Yes, I was reading on mobile and felt that the career section read more professional than the rest, then noticed it was entirely cited to one source - unable to do a check myself, I suggested it, as a comment rather than an oppose because of pure questioning. Take this as support.Kingsif (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the explanation, sounds like a reasonable concern. Cheers, -Zanhe (talk) 01:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: William Ruckelshaus

Article: William Ruckelshaus (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT, CNN
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: American attorney, U.S. deputy attorney general who quit in the Saturday Night Massacre, dies at age 87. Article has significant sourcing gaps. Davey2116 (talk) 21:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

RD: Jonathan Miller

Article: Jonathan Miller (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Guardian BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Important writer and theatre director. Article needs quite a bit of work. Black Kite (talk) 15:42, 27 November 2019 (UTC))[reply

]

(Posted) RD: Clive James

Article: Clive James (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

 The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 16:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

  • I dunno, he's a very well known figure in the UK and the death was only announced today, so could be considered under Nov 27. Once the obituaries come out there will be plenty of sources available.-- P-K3 (talk) 16:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2019 Albania earthquake

Article: 2019 Albania earthquake (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least 24 people have been killed and 650 injured in an earthquake in Albania. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Article is well referenced and enough for ITN Sherenk1 (talk) 07:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Short but well composed article, death toll somewhat larger than expected for that part of the world. Updated blurb with casualty numbers from the article.130.233.2.197 (talk) 07:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support A well referenced article about a notable event. --Λeternus (talk) 08:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This was one of the strongest and deadliest tremors in the region for years. Media still focus their attention on the aftermath and international aid sent.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posting. --Tone 10:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Godfrey Gao

Article: Godfrey Gao (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New York Times, CNN, Time
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Taiwanese-Canadian model and actor. Article is well-sourced. Morgan695 (talk) 05:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) RD: Yeshi Dhonden

Article: Yeshi Dhonden (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.tibetsun.com/news/2019/11/26/renowned-tibetan-doctor-yeshi-dhonden-passes-away
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The Tibetan doctor. All the paragraphs end with a cite but please attach them to some sentences if possible. ミラP 01:28, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

November 26

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

(Posted) RD: Sudhir Dar

Article: Sudhir Dar (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Indian Express]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The article requires minor copyediting. Nizil (talk) 08:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) RD: Gary Rhodes

Article: Gary Rhodes (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: UK celebrity chef. I've tidied it up and cited what I can at the moment but it still needs a bit of work. Black Kite (talk) 10:38, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Georgian protests

Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post
)

News source(s): See article
Credits:

Article updated

 Banedon (talk) 22:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose I have read the article twice and have no idea what is going on. Also I have no sense that these are massive demonstrations of the sort we may cover as opposed to the relatively run of the mill, which we do not. The article is confusing and I am not even certain that anything of significance is still going on. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:28, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose This cannot possibly go to Ongoing, because the protests have ended. The article is terrible, and does not portray events chronologically. It's discussing things from June under Reactions to protests which ended two weeks ago. The format of the article suggests that it was, or might have been, an election article that got COATRACKED into it's current form. Additionally, I check Russian language media outside of Russia and found nothing about this.130.233.2.197 (talk) 08:08, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose both per above and because the article barely mentions protests that are currently happening (i.e. in the news) ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 12:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - It's quite OK to me. STSC (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose before making a judgment on if it's ITN-worthy, the article would need significant improvements. The first being that the list of 'lead figures' in the infobox is longer than the list of refs. Kingsif (talk) 18:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per the myriad concerns. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 10:17, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Hong Kong protests

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post
)

Credits:
Nominator's comments: This disappeared off ongoing for some reason, so I'm renominating it. Banedon (talk) 22:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Reason for renomination? It was likely removed because of the similar election article.  Nixinova TC   22:47, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
They're different articles. Related because they're different aspects of the same story, but still separate. Banedon (talk) 22:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now. I think having the blurb about the election is enough. Once that is about to get bumped off of ITN, I think the protests should be readded to Ongoing and a conversation opened up about whether it should be taken down. --PlasmaTwa2 00:45, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Having the blurb is sufficient.--WaltCip (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The blurb should be modified so that the protest article is included in it, for context. ― Hebsen(previously Heb the best) (talk) 01:19, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Updated election blurb to include link to protests. SpencerT•C 01:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support restoring to ongoing once the blurb, which is now second from the bottom, rolls off. Davey2116 (talk) 03:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose the article had not been "continuously updated" as stipulated by
    WP:ITN for some time, instead getting sporadic, non-specific one sentence updates like "On 2 November, a mostly peaceful but unapproved election gathering at Victoria Park saw police quickly responding by employing tear gas". The election is a good to transition this off the main page. If you want to nominate a different article then fine but this one is a no-go for me.--LaserLegs (talk) 03:21, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Wait until the current blurb falls off the main page. Then reassess and renominate if it looks justified. My guess is that we have not heard the last of this. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:30, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The problem that LaserLegs mentions is very real. While this event is indeed in the news, the updates are very poor and serve more to keep the article in Ongoing than to inform the reader. Nearly all of the updates can be called "crime blotter" or "routine protest events". Crime in Chicago likely impacts the lives of English Wikipedia readers more, generates more deaths and political frustration than this event, and yet we don't update the article with meticulous details and perma-post it to the Main Page. Because ITN is not a news ticker, and we apply some editorial discretion about "what is encyclopedic" when posting. Additionally, the article is plagued by UNDUE and BIAS, and my own efforts to get clear BLP violations fixed revealed an recalcitrant and entrenched editor clique. The best thing that ITN can do for this event is to blurb genuinely notable developments.130.233.2.197 (talk) 07:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Although I am opposed to putting this item back on the ongoing ticker, the above rationale is utter nonsense. The Hong Kong protests and shootings in Chicago are nowhere near on the same level of international importance.--WaltCip (talk) 15:53, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Crime in Chicago is much more than shooting. Name a nationality or ethnicity, it likely has a gang (often several) making millions through bookmaking, extortion, prostitution, robbery, drug dealing, smuggling and tax evasion, much of which depends on foreign events, dossiers, hookers, tourists, drugs, animals and banks. A lot of that money goes a lot of places, including Hong Kong. You ever hear of Al Capone? So has everyone. His outfit's still very ongoing, too, and will be when Jimmy Sham's game is over and maybe remembered in a few online documentaries. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:11, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to see Crime in Chicago in the box then nominate it. This is about Hong Kong, and while the Chicago comparison may be debatable, everything else the IP said is spot on. --LaserLegs (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 25

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Science and technology

(Posted) RD: Frank Biondi

Article: Frank Biondi (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Los Angeles Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see

Nominator's comments: Article updated and well sourced --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 07:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

  • Support Looks good to me. – Ammarpad (talk) 09:50, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Small article but is cited well ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 12:26, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I only looked briefly at this, a couple of unsourced items. It might be better to expand it first and cite it, rather than promote it and let it get expanded with unsourced material. Feel very not strongly about it and barely looked at the article, just a note. Kees08 (Talk) 16:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I see no problems.
    talk) 17:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  •  Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Dresden heist

Article: 
stolen from the Dresden Castle in Germany. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
, etc
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: While the €1 billion total value is currently unconfirmed, this is reported to be the largest diamond heist since WWII at least. Brandmeistertalk 23:25, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Interesting, has expansive coverage, and the article is in pretty good shape. Teemu08 (talk) 02:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support shocking heist, widely reported. -Zanhe (talk) 05:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Clearly related to the latest Rick & Morty episode. (j/c - noteworthy theft, article up to par). --Masem (t) 05:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I am not typically a big fan of crime related nominations, but this is highly unusual on multiple levels. The article looks to be in decent shape. -Ad Orientem (talk) 06:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This is an interesting story and thefts of such valuable items don't occur very often.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support although in my variant of English, we'd just say "... from Dresden Castle ..." rather than "... from the Dresden Castle ..." The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 08:26, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Posted. Tweaked the blurb a bit, to resolve RM's concern above and also to link Dresden Castle. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I think we should also mention/link
    Grünes Gewölbe or "Green Vault Museum" — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Moved from
WP:ERRORS

Not an error, but why is the Residenzschloss Dresden pictured while we can picture more precisely

Grünes Gewölbe, such as [[:|this]] or many others? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

@Gerda Arendt: Perhaps you can suggest a modified blurb. Should Green Vault be added to the blurb, should it replace Dresden Castle, etc. I don't have a feel for which is more significant. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 09:12, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am not the right one to do that, because I'd always prefer the German names ;) - The Green Vault treasure chamber has an article, is more precise, but I can't tell if it rings the same bells as "Grünes Gewölbe" does in German, where you don't have to add Schloss in Dresden. The schloss is not a castle (German Burg), btw, as any image shows, but I understand common name, even if wrong. I'm out now for most of the day. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:32, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that a better image can be used and have added [[:]] to the protected list. I'll have a go at rewording the blurb in due course. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Although our article is titled
stolen from the former electoral palace in Dresden, Germany." (I don't think either Grünes Gewölbe or "Green Vault" would work for English-language readers.) Danke.Sca (talk) 14:21, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
I would suggest: Several hundred diamonds and jeweled items
are stolen from the Green Vault museum (pictured) in Dresden, Germany. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:27, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Well, that's better than the current construction. It might be good to insert "priceless" before "diamonds," as that's what museum officials have called them in several stories I read/saw. – Sca (talk) 22:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The image's information suggests it's the Jewel Room (Pretiosen Saal) that was robbed, though I'm not 100% sure. If so, the blurb's caption could be amended. Brandmeistertalk 22:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It seems like Jewel Room might be Juwelenzimmer and not the Pretiosensaal pictured above[3].—Bagumba (talk) 00:41, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As Gerda says, this is not an error. I'm for retaining the current hook and picture (which I find impressive). Jmar67 (talk) 03:23, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Gerda. The theft was carefully planned to be from the Grünes Gewölbe museum, not from the "castle" Residenzschloss Dresden as a whole. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:42, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have replaced the image and tweaked the blurb accordingly — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, Martin. I think it looks much better. I'm not sure we've got any contemporary image of the Juwelenzimmer at Commons. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:15, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Probably not the kind of place where they allow tourists to take photos ;) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:23, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 107th Grey Cup

Proposed image
Article: 107th Grey Cup (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In Canadian football, the Winnipeg Blue Bombers defeat the Hamilton Tiger-Cats to win the 107th Grey Cup. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Canadian football, the Winnipeg Blue Bombers defeat the Hamilton Tiger-Cats to win the Grey Cup (MVP Andrew Harris pictured).
News source(s): CBC
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 PlasmaTwa2 20:02, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Image now changed. 331dot (talk) 07:52, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Stale) RD: George Clements

Article: George Clements (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [5]
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

 GreatCaesarsGhost 19:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

*Weak Support The article is a bit promotional and sounds like a resume. Also, some parts are unsourced. However, I think that they are relatively minor fixes.

talk) 05:33, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Change to Weak Oppose until the issues are fixed.
talk) 17:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

November 24

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Politics and elections

Sports

(Posted) RD: Colin Mawby

Article: Colin Mawby (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Contemporary Music Centre Ireland
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Sad. Was a DYK article in 2012 but I found many sources gone and had to replace them. Lovely person whom I met. Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) 2019 Romanian presidential election

Proposed image
Article: 2019 Romanian presidential election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Klaus Iohannis is re-elected as President of Romania (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ After failing to receive a majority of votes in the first round, Klaus Iohannis (pictured) of the National Liberal Party is re-elected as President of Romania in a runoff election.
Alternative blurb II: Klaus Iohannis (pictured) of the National Liberal Party is re-elected President of Romania.
News source(s): DW, EuroNews
Credits:
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 2601:602:9200:1310:255D:8BC0:E8A0:2C21 (talk) 03:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

  • Support Very good election article. Cursory looksee of refs looks fine. ITNR.130.233.2.197 (talk) 07:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support - Article looks well referenced, but I think there could be more prose in the Results section. I've also added an Altblurb as the original seemed a bit bland ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 13:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Imperfect, but nothing worth keeping it off the MP. GreatCaesarsGhost 15:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support both blurbs. No red flags.
    talk) 18:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  •  Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:12, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'After failing to receive a majority of votes in the first round' seems an unnecessary detail and an overly negative way of introducing the blurb. The entire clause could be deleted, as could 'in a runoff election'. Modest Genius talk 20:28, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    If the original blurb is considered better, we can switch to that? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:45, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    MSGJ, I think that might be best. A run-off election 2 weeks after the first round is not very notable. It seems like the usual course of how elections progress in Romania, looking at the previous years. There has been a second round in every election since 1992. It is nowhere close to what is happening in Israel. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 21:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    But keep the party as in altblurb2. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 21:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems like User:Stephen has already done it, whether by reading this or unilaterally — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Unilaterally. I didn't spot the discussion here. Stephen 02:48, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I originally posted it to
    WP:ERRORS, where it would be seen more quickly, but for some reason User:MSGJ moved it here. Modest Genius talk 14:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]

(Posted) RD: John Simon

Article: John Simon (critic) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): [6]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

 GreatCaesarsGhost 15:47, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) 2019 Hong Kong local elections

Article: 2019 Hong Kong local elections (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In Hong Kong, the pro-democracy camp wins control of 17 of the 18 district councils in local elections. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Hong Kong, the pro-democracy camp wins control of 17 of the 18 district councils in local elections, in the biggest landslide in the city's electoral history.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In Hong Kong, the pro-democracy camp wins a large majority of district council seats in local elections.
News source(s): NYT, CNN, BBC
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: These are nominally 'local' elections, which we don't usually post. However, the district councils are the only wholly and directly elected part of the Hong Kong government. And, the huge turnout and the pro-democracy camp's large victory here has important political ramifications for the protest movement going forwards. These elections are already getting international coverage. Davey2116 (talk) 00:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Unprecedented turn out with ousting of Pro-Beijing candidates. District Councils: Pre election: 124 seats were held by Pro-democracy members 331 by Pro-Beijing ; After election 389 seats were Pro-democracy 89 Pro-Beijing. "The pro-democrats delivered the biggest landslide in Hong Kong history, seizing control of 17 of the 18 District Councils, tripling their seats from about 124 to 389, and would be able to capture the 117 seats in the Election Committee District Council subsectors which was responsible for electing the Chief Executive." Geographyinitiative (talk) 00:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as before we don't usually post local elections, but this one is unique in both coverage and significance. The only question is whether to remove the Hong Kong protests from Ongoing with this as a blurb. I think not: they are separate events. Banedon (talk) 01:26, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose have we posted HK elections in the past? (I know we've spit venom at other "local elections"). If this is significant because of the protests, then it's covered well enough by the ongoing item which has been sitting in the box for nearly 8 months. --LaserLegs (talk) 01:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose we don't post local elections. This one may be more notable than the average local election, but then on the other hand the Hong Kong protests are already covered in ongoing. If this is the defining moment in the protests, then I could see posting this, but as of right now there's no sign that this will change anything with regard to the ongoing protests. NorthernFalcon (talk) 02:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Opposeper above. We don't post local elections at ITN. Ongoing should have this covered. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:49, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removing from 'ongoing' and replacing with ALT3 blurb and then afterwards making a determination whether it is still "ongoing". Per the linked NYT story, this was not just a local election, this election took on outsize significance, and was viewed as a referendum on the unrest that has created the city’s worst political crisis in decades. ALT3 blurb suggestion: 2019 Hong Kong local elections result in the biggest landslide in the city's history, with the pro-democracy camp winning 17 out of 18 district council seats. Levivich 04:49, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Was going to nominate myself but seeing the previous oppose to local election nominations, did not do so. However we can see that this is top news worldwide and the article is well referenced with sufficient prose. We can do an exception in this case, we are not saying that local elections should be ITNR. Sherenk1 (talk) 06:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Levivich's proposal. Anything which is top news on both Reuters and Agence France Presse (11/25/2019 - 06:36 story, and see the editor's choice left and centre videos) should easily qualify for a blurb. The outcome was "nothing short of a revolution", Hong Kong political analyst Willy Lam said. "It's a sound repudiation of the (Hong Kong) administration and Beijing's policy toward Hong Kong." starship.paint (talk) 06:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support add blurb/remove from Ongoing. ITNR is not a requirement for posting; non-ITNR items may be posted after establishing significance, and this meets that criteria. The article is in good shape. Elections are considered by all parties to be significant events, whereas the protest details are very routine and would get SNOWed if nominated alone. We can add the protests back to Ongoing if necessary.130.233.2.197 (talk) 07:28, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. They may be local elections but, given the current situation in Hong Kong, they are clearly significant enough to feature on the front page of major international news outlets. I also think this can be compatible with keeping the protests article in the Ongoing section; the articles are related and complement each other as they each tackle different aspects of the situation. Conejero intl (talk) 11:00, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Local elections though they may be, there is an extraordinary amount of international attention being paid to them by the news media. As it's in the news, we'd be remiss not to include it.--WaltCip (talk) 12:58, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Went with the original blurb. --Jayron32 13:15, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • PP support – Interesting that they allowed any election at all. – Sca (talk) 14:10, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Can we modify the blurb so that the
    protests to it? This context is what makes these elections important. ― Hebsen(previously Heb the best) (talk) 19:40, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Support - I agree with the suggestions made by @Hebsen:. The election is significant, not only because of pro-democratic bloc's victory, but also because it essentially functions as a referendum to show that the public is still supporting the Hong Kong protesters. OceanHok (talk) 14:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Stale) RD: Goo Hara

Article: Goo Hara (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, The Guardian, The Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
talk) 16:49, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

2019 Davis Cup

Article: 2019 Davis Cup (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In tennis, the Davis Cup concludes with Spain winning their sixth title. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, Eurosport
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: The Davis Cup is the premier international team event in men's tennis. Known as the "World Cup" of tennis, it is one of the few tennis events in which players are part of national teams. Conejero intl (talk) 07:37, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - Limited prose in the article, specifically about the results of the matches ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 13:25, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Acceptable. STSC (talk) 19:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose For lack of prose, throughout the article, AND in the manifold, sprawling table-laden daughter articles. Groups of articles like this are fine as far as they go: documenting the fine-details results of a long competition in tables. But they are just not suitable for ITN. 130.233.2.197 (talk) 10:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 23

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health and environment

International relations

Politics and elections

Sports

(Posted) 2019 Copa Libertadores Final

Article: 
Copa Libertadores Final (Post)
News source(s): BBC

Credits:

Article needs updating
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: This was nominated last year and posted, and it's the most significant club soccer match outside of Europe. There's also a bit of political background to it as the match was postponed and moved due to the Chilean protests. The article however could use a little bit of updating before being posted. NorthernFalcon (talk) 11:22, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) RD: Liu Shahe

Article: Liu Shahe (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Paper
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

 Zanhe (talk) 10:40, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Closed) Murder of Grace Millane

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Murder of Grace Millane (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A 27 year old man has been convicted of the murder of 22 year old tourist Grace Millane in New Zealand. (Post)
News source(s): https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/403901/guilty-verdict-in-grace-millane-murder-trial
Credits:
Nominator's comments: High profile murder case in New Zealand which has received international coverage. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 01:54, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose good faith nom. Even in the middle of this unusually slow period at ITN, I don't think we should be posting tabloid news. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not considered "tabloid" in nz and the failure of the "rough sex" defence is legally significant. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 04:34, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, as per this article, "Concern grows over ‘rough sex gone wrong’ defence in courts", in The Guardian [7]. The case - from her disappearance to the murder trial - was certainly not tabloid news in Australia either. RebeccaGreen (talk) 06:45, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't say it was tabloid in the UK either, and whole case is significant there because of how NZ always seen as safe for single female travelers. Kingsif (talk) 04:49, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose A murder verdict is legit major breaking news, by any court reporter's standards, but a weird time to start publicizing a story. Save updates for previous ITN-featured allegations, suspects or victims. Less jarring for the unfamiliar that way. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment If this story was going to be featured, conviction is the correct time - ITN does not feature allegations, suspects or charges in almost all instances (in part due to
      WP:BLP considerations). Crimes do sometimes feature when they happen, but that's judged on individual merit at the time. Thryduulf (talk) 12:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
      ]
  • Oppose May be a high profile NZ case, but it doesn't have international ramifications. --Masem (t) 05:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The victim, her parents and most everyone who'd know her to miss her were and will be dealing with this in England long after what's-his-name stops bothering New Zealanders. But yeah, the NZ news is hit harder than the UK press. Ri Chun-hee is apparently unmoved, for better or worse. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also add that the people involved here were not high profile, in contrast to the Oscar Pistorius case which I know we did post despite arguing also having no significant international importance. May be high profile in the country of interest (and this would go for any US case too, we aren't special in that regard) but its easy in such a case to judge how international media is coveraging it to know if it has recognizability beyond the country borders. --Masem (t) 15:17, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not of major international significance.  Nixinova TC   05:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose A run-of-the-mill murder case blown out of proportion by the media. Lcmortensen (mailbox) 06:30, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Per Masem, et al. – Sca (talk) 15:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Per above. MSN12102001 (talk) 15:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Though tragic, I don't believe this belongs on the first page. Wikipedia is not a newspaper. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 17:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

William Wang (defector)

Nominator's comments: Defector making allegations about Chinese government involvement in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Australia Geographyinitiative (talk) 00:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Stub article, no blurb, no sources presented. I don't speak Mandarin so why would I go to the Mandarin Wikipedia? Further, your nom comment suggests the story is about a defector making allegations. That doesn't mean they're true. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:09, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on significance - it's seeing a lot of coverage in different countries. The allegations have been taken seriously as well, with Taiwan opening investigations already. However, the article is threadbare right now; it'll need more details to be posted. Banedon (talk) 01:29, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose It's hard to tell yet whether the guy is a real spy or not, but he's quite possibly a fraudster, see The Age. In any case, this does not rise to the significance of a blurb (at first glance I thought it was an RD nomination). -Zanhe (talk) 04:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The article is mostly reaction to his defection, might fail
    WP:BLP issues. There's no indication of any major significance or even if his allegations are plausible. The nomination was incomplete ('see Mandarin Wikipedia' is not a legitimate source) and gives no rationale either. Modest Genius talk 14:08, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Oppose - Not proven allegations from someone just wanted to stay in Australia. STSC (talk) 19:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Stale) RD: Barbara Hillary

Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NYT obit

Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: First black woman to reach either and both global poles. Wug·a·po·des​ 18:40, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm really sorry. This is a decent article but is too stale to post now. We have had a rush of good nominations lately. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:12, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 22

Business and economy

Health and environment
  • 2019 Samoa measles outbreak
    • Samoa confirms that 20 persons, all but one under the age of four, have died of measles, and 11 more are in critical condition. Authorities recorded 1,644 cases since the outbreak began last month. (RNZ)

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) RD: Stephen Cleobury

Article: Stephen Cleobury (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Death announced on 23rd. Choral conductor best known for annual Christmas broadcasts of Carols from Kings for 37 years, broadcast internationally. Klbrain (talk) 15:13, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

RD: Arthur Marks

Article: Arthur Marks (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Hollywood Reporter
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: C Class article, needs volunteers to help with the sourcing. Death announced on 22. DBigXray 09:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

RD: Michael J. Pollard

Article: Michael J. Pollard (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): USA Today
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Start Class article, needs volunteers to help with the sourcing. Death announced on 22. DBigXray 09:15, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

RD: Henry Sobel

Article: Henry Sobel (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Globo.com, Folha de S. Paulo
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
talk) 01:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

RD: Gugu Liberato

Article: Gugu Liberato (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Globo.com, Folha de S. Paulo, Veja, Time24News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
talk) 01:41, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

Colombia protests

Proposed image
Article: 
anti-government protests in Colombia (pictured), amid growing unrest across Latin America.
News source(s): BBC

Credits:

Nominator's comments: Could in some way tie it to the final absolute jump-off point of the new Latin American SpringKingsif (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Could use a little more expansion about what led to the protests in the first place, but meets minimum standards. SpencerT•C 17:23, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Sadly, three deaths in a protest just isnt a notable blurb in today's world. Perhaps post to ongoing, but no new additions since the 22nd.—Bagumba (talk) 07:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's at seven deaths (in the first 2 days), I just thought three on the first day was rather notable. Compared to only one death in HK protests all year. Kingsif (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose like Bagumba, the initial story is "meh" and yet the article seems to be suggesting this is an ongoing issue. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 18:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb and ongoing later. Hundreds of thousands of people involved, dominates national news, etc. Banedon (talk) 01:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Globally and regionally significant news. STSC (talk) 19:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per above. Davey2116 (talk) 03:26, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Remove: Trump impeachment inquiry

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Nominator's comments: Lots of sound and fury this week, but nothing major beyond a handful of witness testimonies. It might be best to revisit re-posting this to the main page once there's an actual impeachment vote in the Senate. As it is now, both sides seem pretty firmly entrenched in their positions. --WaltCip (talk) 13:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Keep Slow week? Did you forget your winking smiley after this? Tuesday and Wednesday's testimony was the most substantial event since the whistle-blower. Also the impeachment vote is in the house; the removal vote is in the Senate. GreatCaesarsGhost 13:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep until he is acquitted, resigns or is removed. It's going to be front page news everywhere until them, and we serve our readers by helping them find reliable information about this topic. Jehochman Talk 13:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Exactly the same could be said for Brexit. And actually, Trump's impeachment is nowhere near front page news in the UK, whereas Brexit and our general election (as a result of Brexit deadlock) most certainly is. We could serve our (non-American) readers well by restoring Brexit if this argument holds any water. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 16:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I supported removal last time but after this week, how could we remove it? ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 14:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove per nom. If we were considering these events in isolation, they would not be posted as individual ITN items until the final vote. SpencerT•C 15:04, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove The event is going to take months (between the current questioning, the House forming and voting on the terms of impeachment, etc.) It's major news, and there's a ton of coverage of it in US sources, but its going to be like this through the end of the Congressional term before they take their holiday break, and likely to continue into Jan and Feb. Clearly, if the House votes to pass the terms of impeachment, that's a blurb, and at the point if the Senate holds their sessions to actually determine if to convict, that might be where ongoing would be appropriate again since that would be more reasonably limited in its time frame (a month or so). --Masem (t) 15:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is what ongoing is for. The article continues to be updated, as the process is ongoing. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – (keep) – Developments continue. Today DT sez he wants to be impeached. This is the most significant political topic in the U.S. since the days of "I am not a crook." [8]Sca (talk) 16:39, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Per above. MSN12102001 (talk) 16:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Article has been updated essentially daily, and has a full paragraph of new information just about the events of yesterday. Meets all of the requirements for Ongoing items in spades. --Jayron32 16:52, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Muboshgu and Jayron. I have to say that "nothing major beyond a handful of witness testimonies" is quite an understatement considering how much coverage they generated.-- P-K3 (talk) 17:17, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. Still in the news, still updated frequently. Davey2116 (talk) 21:07, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

UK misses an UNGA deadline to hand over Chagos Archipelago to Mauritius

Article: Chagos Archipelago sovereignty dispute (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The African Union denounces the United Kingdom for its "continued colonial administration" of the Chagos Archipelago as it fails to meet the 22 November deadline set by the United Nations General Assembly to hand over the islands to Mauritius. (Post)
News source(s): African Union, Anadolu Agency, Euronews, TeleSUR
Credits:

Nominator's comments: This is a significant development in the history of decolonisation, the Chagos Archipelago is the last remaining European colony in Africa and among the last in the world. Also highlights the UK's disregard for an UNGA resolution which almost unanimously decided that the occupation of the islands is illegal. Viva Nicolás (talk) 16:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's what the news is for, not Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 19:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yes.
ITN would tell the world. STSC (talk) 17:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
We don't
right great wrongs. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

November 21

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations
Law and crime

Politics and elections
  • Vanuatu backtracks on a controversial law that would have allowed immigration authorities to racially profile and closely follow people from the Middle East. (RNZ)
  • 2019 Colombian protests
    • Thousands of protestors take to the streets in
      Iván Duque Márquez. The protests were instigated over controversial tax and labor reforms proposed by Congress, murders of indigenous leaders, and the government’s failure to implement the FARC peace deal. (Washington Post)

(Closed) Half-Life: Alyx

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Half-Life: Alyx (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In video games, Valve Corporation announces Half-Life: Alyx, the first game in its series since 2007. (Post)
News source(s): Polygon Gamespot engadget The Verge
Credits:
Nominator's comments: I agree that most video game-related news are unfit for ITN, however this specific event is something that has been rumored for decades and has become legendary over the years - it already googles over 23 million. 
T C L) 09:09, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Oppose posting a product announcement not covered in depth in mainstream media(not just niche publications). 331dot (talk) 09:12, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per 331dot. – Ammarpad (talk) 09:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose an announcement of a video game? Nope. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 18:28, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The scheduled release isn't even until March. If at that time this game becomes front-page news in mainstream publications, let's talk. Funcrunch (talk) 20:31, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose - I will commit every waking breath of mine on Wikipedia to ensure a video game item never makes it to ITN, or else may God strike me dead. This particular item is not especially notable. WaltCip (talk) 21:27, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong oppose Even as a VG centric editor and aware how major this is in that industry, this is clearly not ITN. ITN is not really for any type of product announcements regardless of how much an impact they could have in that industry. --Masem (t) 21:33, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose if it's released and becomes a phenomenon (see Pokemon Go) then maybe, but until then this is premature. Banedon (talk) 01:31, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: John Mann

Article: John Mann (musician) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Globe and Mail
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Lead singer of the band Spirit of the West died November 20. The bio is reasonably well referenced. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 01:19, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

November 20

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) Wataru Misaka

Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times

Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
NBA. —Bagumba (talk) 04:08, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

(Posted) Fábio Barreto

Article: Fábio Barreto (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Folha de S. Paulo, Globo.com
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
talk) 01:12, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

  • talk) 04:22, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • One citation missing, which I've tagged, but its not a crucial sentence so if you can't easily find a citation you can probably just remove it. Once that's sorted though this will be good to go. Thryduulf (talk) 09:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • talk) 11:38, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]

==9/9/2001

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Health and environment
  • Fifteen children are confirmed (and three more suspected) dead from measles in Samoa as the illness epidemic continues within the country. (Radio New Zealand)

International Relations

Law and crime
Politics and elections

Name:Aryan kumar mohali


November 18

Armed conflicts and attacks
  • 2019 Hong Kong protests
    • Police seal off and trap hundreds of students and protesters inside Hong Kong Polytechnic University amid fears of a crackdown. After a police officer is injured, security forces threaten to fire live bullets if protesters do not give up lethal weapons. (Reuters)
    • Protesters manage to escape from the university by shimmying down plastic hosing from a bridge and fleeing on waiting motorbikes as the police fire projectiles. (Reuters)
  • Second Libyan Civil War
  • Yemeni Civil War (2015–present)
  • 2019 Iranian fuel protests
  • Northern Mali conflict
    • Militants kill 24
      soldiers and wound 29 others on an army patrol in northern Mali. Seventeen militants were also killed in the melee. 6 injured soldiers later die increasing the death toll to 42. (Reuters) (The New York Times)

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents
  • Fukushima nuclear disaster
    • The
      Japanese government authorizes a release of contaminated water from the plant into the Pacific Ocean. Officials say that the release represents a "significantly small" risk to human health. (Kyodo News Plus)

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) RD: Terry O'Neill

Article: Terry O'Neill (photographer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, Sky News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Swinging 60s British photographer. May be some sourcing required. but not a very long article. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes, the one that's now gone. Perhaps we can just ignore the cn tag then. Cheers though. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well quite possibly, but I'm not sure what it has to do with your jokey small text comment. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 21:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: John Brown

Article: John Campbell Brown (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): RAS Uni. Glasgow
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: The Astronomer Royal for Scotland. His death was announced in reliable sources on the 18th, but he actually died on the 16th. Unfortunately the RSes don't mention the exact date of death, but otherwise the article seems adequately sourced. Modest Genius talk 12:41, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

The death date is now sourced to a local newspaper. Struck above. Modest Genius talk 17:56, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 17

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents
  • A gas explosion in Chittagong, Bangladesh, kills at least seven people and injures eight. (Reuters)
  • The first known case of COVID-19 is traced to a 55-year-old man who had visited a market in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Closed) Fresno mass shooting

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
mass shooting. (Post)
News source(s): NYT, Sacremento Bee, BBC, L.A. Times, Guardian

Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: More people died in this shooting than in the previous one nominated that took place in Santa Clarita. Suspect is also still at large - an unusual ending to most mass shootings in which the suspect either is captured or takes their own life. WaltCip (talk) 14:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Follow-up nom comment - I might also add that this shooting is unusual in that it did not take place in a school or a public space, but at someone's private dwelling. Children were also present.--WaltCip (talk) 14:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, per the discussion of the Saugus shooting below. None of the differences are significant. Modest Genius talk 14:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Modest Genius. --Masem (t) 14:52, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose at this time, I concur with Modest Genius. 331dot (talk) 14:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now. Article contains very little information; it is only marginally past stub level. Heck, there's almost more text in the headers than in the actual prose itself! I would consider supporting with a significant expansion of text. --Jayron32 14:57, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be willing to expand it. What sort of details would you be looking for? Local/national reactions? A synopsis of what occurred? --WaltCip (talk) 15:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A synopsis is better. Reactions are usually
reliable sources to write a decent article. --Jayron32 17:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
To be clear, it was a watch party, one that happened to be in a garden.--WaltCip (talk) 17:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
For the avoidance of doubt, where I come from there's no such thing as a watch party. That just sounds like a load of creepy blokes comparing their pieces. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 17:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nor where I come from. Sacremento Bee calls it simply a backyard party. – Sca (talk) 17:12, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've heard the media use the term "watch party" term dozens of times, whether its for a major sports contest (i.e. the Super Bowl), important political events, or series finales of popular shows. A quick Google search shows 9,920,000 results for the term. TomCat4680 (talk) 17:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, in America. This is English language Wikipedia. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 17:39, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah and British English uses words and phrases American English doesn't either, and vice versa. Doesn't make them either dialect illegitimate. TomCat4680 (talk) 17:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I said nothing about British English. There are plenty of other variants, none of which use "watch party" in this context. When this becomes "American English Wikipedia", let me know. But we're dithering around the edges. This, like all such other "mass shooting in US" nominations is a dead duck. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 17:46, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My point was just because you've "never heard of it", doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Google found almost 10 million results for the term, so clearly it's commonly used. TomCat4680 (talk) 17:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Yes, but a word that's going to be misunderstood (not even just simply not understood - a "watch party" is surely more common to mean vigil or having a stake-out?) by a large number of readers doesn't belong on the main page. Kingsif (talk) 17:47, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
What's there to misunderstand? Like I said already, a watch party is when a large group of people gather at a specific location and time to watch a certain program on TV. Not exactly rocket science here. CNN called it a watch party by the way. TomCat4680 (talk) 17:55, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I agree; I wouldn't mind a proposed alt-blurb that highlights that this is the third high-profile mass shooting in California within a week.--WaltCip (talk) 17:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PS: "Please do not ... oppose an item because the event is only relating to a single country."Sca (talk) 17:20, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why not highlight that it's the Xth (~400th?) mass shooting this year or something similar? That, to me, is far more newsworthy than a coincidental three in one arbitrary geographical locale in a week. There's no link, so using Wikipedia voice to somehow even allude to a one is insulting in extremis. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 17:43, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Another mass shooting in California this week. Without a notable death count, this now falls into practically expected. Kingsif (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose but expand. Article is pretty scant on specific details. The suspect is unidentified and still on the loose, the motive is unknown, it's not even clear whether or not the suspect even knew the victims or if it was just a random act of violence, etc. TomCat4680 (talk) 18:00, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Saudi Aramco IPO

Article: Saudi Aramco (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Saudi Aramco sells 1.5% of its shares in an initial public offering, valuing the entire company at $1.71 trillion (Post)
News source(s): [9]
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: $1.71 trillion makes it by far the largest public company in history (see comparison [10]Banedon (talk) 12:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support on quality and significance, but feel we need at least a little context on the IPO itself. Every story I read on this is mentioning Khashoggi, most are saying this is bad timing, asking "what does this all mean?" etc. GreatCaesarsGhost 13:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Shame on me for taking blurb at face value. Why in the hell would be post a blurb for something that hasn't happened? GreatCaesarsGhost 12:58, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose it will only be after the IPO that we will have a good idea of the value of the company; the IPO closes Dec 5. Additionally, we usually don't post this type of business news unless proven to be some significant/superlative facet. (To add, the IPO had been planned for a while, the drone strike earlier this year slowed plans but obviously they are back now. This is not a big surprise outside of the speed.) --Masem (t) 15:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Masem ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 15:20, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose it's a big number, but as Masem notes, meaningless until after the IPO. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 15:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait. Apparently that's only the announced price for the first 1.5% of the company, so this is a massive extrapolation and no-one has actually bought it yet. If it finishes as the largest IPO ever, I think that would be worth posting, but let's wait to see what happens. Modest Genius talk 15:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. This is the first IPO for what is essentially the world's largest corporation. On top of that, it stands a fairly good chance of breaking the IPO record.NorthernFalcon (talk) 03:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The IPO has been withdrawn from the London and New York markets, which were the only one's that mattered. It will debut sometime (Dec-Jan?) on the tiny and illiquid Saudi-run Tadawul exchange. That is, the stock will not be freely tradable and will not represent controlling interest, as most readers would assume for an IPO. This has been a cat-and-mouse game going back to 2006 or so. This simply has to wait, at least, for the stock to actually be listed and for bonafide transactions to take place (so as to establish some semblance of "public" valuation).130.233.3.140 (talk) 06:45, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Big number, little meaning. – Ammarpad (talk) 05:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Sri Lankan presidential election

Proposed image
Article: 2019 Sri Lankan presidential election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Former Defence Secretary, Gotabaya Rajapaksa wins the 2019 Sri Lankan presidential election to become the 8th president of Sri Lanka. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Gotabaya Rajapaksa wins the Sri Lanka presidential election.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Former Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa (pictured) is elected president of Sri Lanka.
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Results are expected on Sunday, otherwise Monday. No doubt, prose is lacking hence would like to start discussion on what else could be done to make it to ITN Sherenk1 (talk) 02:20, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) 2019 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series

Proposed image
Article: 2019 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Kyle Busch (pictured) wins the 2019 Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series championship. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In stock car racing, Kyle Busch (pictured) wins the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series championship.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In stock car racing, the NASCAR Cup Series concludes, with Kyle Busch (pictured) winning the driver's championship
News source(s): MRN, USA Today, The New York Times
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 Dough4872 03:21, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

  • Image isn't protected. I've just sent it to CMP and I'll post as soon as the bot does its job. Black Kite (talk) 23:09, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 16

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

2019 Bolivian political crisis

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2019 Bolivian political crisis (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:
 Kingsif (talk) 20:38, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Blurb is still on news and no immediate sign it is about to fall off. Better to consider the situation when the blurb does fall off. --Masem (t) 21:52, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good point. I nom'd because the blurb is a week old... but so is the box... Kingsif (talk) 00:08, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) 2019 Iranian fuel protests

Article: 
2019 Iranian fuel protests
News source(s): BBC

Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Dominating worldwide headlines. Article is well referenced. Sherenk1 (talk) 14:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Your blurb is plagiarized. Abductive (reasoning) 19:17, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The content of the article is fine and suitable for ITN. I have addressed some minor CE things. I cannot check references, however, because 13/20 of them are in Farsi or Arabic. I know for certain that some of the details that these references support can be found in English language media. Without those, I cannot know for certain the precise words that protestors have been chanting, for example.130.233.3.140 (talk) 10:41, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Admins, please note that my comment here should not be interpreted as an oppose !vote. Non-English sources are not in themselves a problem, and I was only asking for editors to incorporate English-language ones as a matter of polishing.130.233.3.140 (talk) 07:20, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support according to the BBC, we're now up to at least twelve killed and the article is of sufficient quality. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 18:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • SupportAmnesty International, clearly the more reliable source in this matter, is reporting at least 106 deaths during this event. The article quality is sufficient. It drifted a bit since TRM commented, which is why I withheld my support, but has since been remedied. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 19:57, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Looks like a decent article.-- P-K3 (talk) 21:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Why is this not being posted? Sherenk1 (talk) 02:07, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The blurbs (even with "at least" included) are an under-representation of a nation-wide protest with several cities descending into anarchy for a time. I propose either removing the "12 people" part or adding the Amnesty International statistics to avoid propagating a possible big lie further. I added a blurb resembling the one used in Persian Wikipedia. Bazdasht (talk) 11:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support and I have added another altblurb. I know that we try to avoid stuff like "dozens, many" in blurbs, but the near-total internet blackout in Iran means that it's impossible to get precise numbers and exact details. This is clearly A Big Deal, and I think it better to post something a little vague than to ignore it completely. There seems to be very good consensus to post this. Can someone who can, move on this?130.233.3.140 (talk) 07:20, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Wrote an altblurb based on alt3. I still think wording could be improved; please leave suggestions at
    WP:ERRORS. SpencerT•C 19:00, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]

November 15

Business and economy

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

RD: Mark Cady

Article: Mark Cady (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): AP
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
Supreme Court of Iowa (2011–19) who wrote the opinion which legalized same-sex marriage in Iowa, dies at age 66. Article could use some expansion. Davey2116 (talk) 12:41, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

November 14

Business and economy
  • Ford announces that its new electric SUV will be known as the Mustang Mach-E. The "Mustang" model name, previously employed by Ford's muscle cars, could be an important asset for the new venture. (Reuters)

Disasters and accidents
  • A vehicle collision in
    Sistan and Baluchestan Province kills at least 28 people, all Afghan nationals. (BBC News)

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Closed) Saugus High School shooting

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Shooting at Saugus High School in Santa Clarita, California, USA (Post)
News source(s): https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/los-angeles-county-deputies-respond-report-santa-clarita-school-shooting-n1082231

Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: The calamity in Santa Clarita has made national news. One person has been killed and countless injured. This is a high-profile situation — politicians like
talk) 19:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/los-angeles-county-deputies-respond-report-santa-clarita-school-shooting-n1082231

  • Not wishing to partake in the rest of this conversation, I will note that To exclude this from the Main Page would be a disservice... is not an argument for (or against) Main Page inclusion or any Wikipedia action, as we are not here to
    right great wrongs. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 19:43, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
This is not the place to express views on guns in the United States, regardless of their merits. 331dot (talk) 19:59, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, I don't see anything about a car bomb in Baghdad on the main page.
    talk) 20:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Those shootings had much higher levels of casualties. If we posted every shooting like this in the United States, that's all we would be doing here. 331dot (talk) 20:28, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, sadly. And @
Sanjay7373: Please stop posting so many of your own comments on this nomination; I understand how you feel, but it's not good form. Funcrunch (talk) 21:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
A better way to look at this: if there was a mass stabbing in France that killed two people, that'd also not make ITN. Neither would any mass casualty incident which killed two people in Canada (unless the people who died were notable: such as an assassination of a prominent political figure or something). Nothing really to do with it being in the US. -- Rockstonetalk to me! 22:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As I indicated, politicians routinely comment on tragic events and doing so is no indication of its significance. Maybe if a law was passed as a result, but not now. 331dot (talk) 20:51, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Which do you think is more notable: the construction of a Hindu temple in India, or the deaths of 2 innocent students at a school in Santa Clarita? A Hindu temple is just a building, here, two students have died and countless more were injured.
talk) 20:56, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
That's a false equivalency. We judge each nomination on its own merits. 331dot (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The injured are not 'countless', either. 331dot (talk) 21:03, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I had a feeling this would be nominated if for no other reason than this occurred in Los Angeles County. You have made your point, Sanjay, but there's just not enough for this to be fit for ITN due to the high frequency of mass shootings in the US. With that said, strong oppose. Also, regarding your comparison to the Hindu temple story, please be mindful of your systemic bias.--WaltCip (talk) 21:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, but for a different reason than the people trashing our gun laws: even if this shooting took place outside of the US, it still wouldn't be notable enough for ITN. It's tragic, but there are neither enough deaths nor any indication that it'll impact things long term in order to warrant a blurb. -- Rockstonetalk to me! 22:17, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Lacks long term notability. Nonstopmaximum (talk) 22:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, the last school shooting in the US that was posted on ITN was the
    Spokoyni (talk) 22:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Oppose – For all the reasons expressed, once again, above. – Sca (talk) 22:34, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Vashishtha Narayan Singh

Article: Vashishtha Narayan Singh (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NDTV, India Today
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

 --DannyS712 (talk) 19:16, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

@Spencer, Mike gigs, and Pawnkingthree: Please reconsider you votes. I have updated article. May require minor copyediting. -Nizil (talk) 14:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your referencing work. My position remains since there have been no new additions regarding his career work as a mathematician. SpencerT•C 15:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see, it looks like he did not contribute much to mathematics and the article is reflective of that. I will be honest, the article does not do a good job explaining why Singh is notable. Is he notable for being lost on the train journey? If so, then the article should be expanded more to reflect that. Right now, the article is basically a CV in prose form without much meat to it. Best, SpencerT•C 00:00, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Spencer:, as I have written on talkpage, he is notable for "his circumstances" instead of "his accomplishments". I have tried to dive deeper in his circumstances like being lost etc but most of the information is untrustworthy/differing in details and anecdotal so I refrained from adding it. The article could have been better with more in depth information but I believe that this start-class basic article is enough to be in ITN. Regards, -Nizil (talk) 05:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Several sentences need rewriting in grammatical English. Stephen 10:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Stephen: Sorry. I am not native English speaker. I welcome copyediting by others. -Nizil (talk) 05:26, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Branko Lustig

Article: Branko Lustig (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/schindlers-list-producer-branko-lustig-dies-87-67015227
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Well referenced article --DannyS712 (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) RD: Gordie Gosse

Article: Gordie Gosse (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/speaker-of-the-house-ndp-mla-gordie-gosse-1.5358686
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
Speaker of the House of Assembly of Nova Scotia (2011–2013). Just cleaned up some unsourced content, but should look good. ミラP 17:04, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Support - Short article but sourcing looks good ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 18:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose. The election result is unsourced. Also, he was in office from 2003-2015 so why is only the 2013 result included? Thryduulf (talk) 20:21, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Article looks good. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 21:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose As with many other start-class politician articles nominated to RD, very minimal information about what he accomplished in his role as a politician (policies, political issues, legislation passed, etc.) beyond "Gosse implemented a strict policy banning the use of mobile devices, including smart phones in the Nova Scotia House of Assembly during Question Period". SpencerT•C 12:48, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - looks good to go in my POV.BabbaQ (talk) 12:59, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The 2013 election result now has a source attached to it. ミラP 02:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Kees08 (Talk) 07:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 13

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents
  • A bus collision with a truck near Nitra kills 13 people and leaves at least 17 wounded. The disaster is the deadliest in Slovakia in a decade. (Reuters)

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) RD: Tom Spurgeon

Article: Tom Spurgeon (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Well-known comics journalist, died yesterday. Article is well-sourced and has been updated. Newyorkbrad (talk) 15:58, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

RD: Niall Tóibín

Article: Niall Tóibín (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): RTÉ, Independent.ie, The Irish Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Not much info yet as to how he died, only reported about 10 minutes ago. comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 12:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

  • Reply Hi. I'm not sure which part of the section you think was COPYVIO. But, as per CLOP/COPYVIO check on that section, the only content with a material overlap is the sentence which starts "From Ryan's Daughter and Bracken in the 1970s...". I wrote the original form of that sentence. Myself. In 2005. I did not copy it from a Wordpress site. Or any other source. The current form of that sentence is based on some amends in 2007. Those amends (2007) were made a full decade before that Wordpress site was published (in 2017). If there is any overlap in content, then I would suggest that it is because that Wordpress page was copy/pasted from the Wikipedia article. Rather than the other way around. I have removed the COPYVIO tag. Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 12:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This was for the in-article line "He also acted for the radio, such as his guest appearance in the BBC Radio 4 series Baldi" which is verbatim (save tense) from reference 10, someone's personal website that is both not a Wiki-mirror and appears to be his own (presumably original) writing, and not found on any other non-mirror website. I tagged it just so that someone would take a look.130.233.3.140 (talk) 06:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Raymond Poulidor

Article: Raymond Poulidor (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC, Spiegel
Credits:

Article needs updating
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Notable cyclist, Vuelta winner, several podiums at the Tour de France, immortal rivalry with Jacques Anquetil. Article needs some work, I will try to get to as much as I can later today. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) RD: Kieran Modra

Article: Kieran Modra (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian, ABC News
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see

Nominator's comments: Article well sourced and updated. Australian Paralympic swimmer and tandem cyclist, died in cycling accident. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

November 12

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) RD: Edwin Bramall

Article: Edwin Bramall (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Article well sourced and updated --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 18:40, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

November 11

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Law and crime
Politics and elections

Science and technology

RD: Charles Rogers (American football)

Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBS News

Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: C Class article with excellent sourcing DBigXray 15:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) RD: James Le Mesurier

Article: James Le Mesurier (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Independent
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
White Helmets volunteer organization. Responses section needs a neutrality fix and there's one unsourced sentence in the "Work with the White Helmets" section, but other than that it looks good. ミラP 22:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Comment I've just edited the article a bit, adding more sourced information about his work with the White Helmets, and deleting an unsourced and incomplete sentence in that section. RebeccaGreen (talk) 01:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Looks good now. Significant improvements made. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 08:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The information in paretheses under Military service surely means something, but it's lost on ENGVAR and JARGON. Presumably, he was in the military while not under command, or somesuch. If that was the extent of his official service, then I don't know why there should be a Military service section.130.233.2.197 (talk) 12:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It seems that he joined the army before he was on active service. His actual service is covered by "He was promoted to lieutenant on 11 August 1993, and to captain on 11 August 1996. He worked with the United Nations peacekeeping force in the former Yugoslavia. He retired from the military on 1 June 2000." So that's 7 years of military service, after 3 years at university sponsored by the army, and about 6 weeks on probation at Sandhurst. Perhaps that section could be edited to make that a bit clearer. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delay until article is more settled. I'm not experienced with ITN proposals, but with the Turkish media talking about his wife saying Le Mesurier was thinking of suicide 15 days before his death and was on psychiatric medication, it looks like there likely will be significant messy developments before too long. I wouldn't add such stuff at the moment on WP:BLP and WP:RS grounds, but here is an example. Rwendland (talk) 16:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transit of Mercury

Article: Transit of Mercury (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Mercury transits the Sun. (Post)
News source(s): The Independent, timeanddate.com
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Currently ongoing. Quite rare astronomical event. Arseny1992 (talk) 13:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support It is not a super rare event (last was 3 yrs ago, next is about 20) but this is along the lines of total eclipses and the like, so fair enough to post. --Masem (t) 14:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
According to that article, the next transit of Mercury is projected for 2032 Nov 13, which is 13 years from now. Banedon (talk) 22:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - the article is not up to standard, several unsourced data in tables, sentences or even paragraphs. starship.paint (talk) 14:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Arseny1992: - I suggest you improve the article by citing sources for all information in text or tables. starship.paint (talk) 15:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, there seems to be no prose about this specific transit, and the pattern of the article suggests there never will be any. --LukeSurl t c 15:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose. Whilst this is indeed a rare event (next one is in 2032), and I've been watching a live stream of it, at this point it's little more than trivia. All the science that can be obtained from such events was extracted centuries ago. ITN did post 2012 transit of Venus, but that event got a lot more public attention and a stand-alone article. That's even more true of total eclipses, which still have difficulty filling an article with useful information. Other than 'rare event happened exactly as predicted', it's not clear what could be said about this transit. There's certainly no substantial new content in transit of Mercury (currently just a tense change). Creating a new article and getting it into DYK would be better than putting the generic article in ITN. Modest Genius talk 15:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Well as this transit is about to end soon, so no point to post on ITN now. As astronomical events can be predicted to eternity into the future, this probably needs to be posted on ITN/R instead and be notified in due time without short notice before one occur (be it a transit or any type of eclipse). --Arseny1992 (talk) 15:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, call for close Didn't seem particularly important, and is (almost) over now. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 17:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm not sure why something described by a reliable source as an ""incredibly rare celestial event" should be snow-closed. It won't happen for another 20-odd years. ITN does cover events that have completed, so no reason to just shut this down. Probably as notable (and indeed rarer) as many other predictable celestial events, such a total eclipse. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 18:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support as notable as eclipses etc, and rare, as noted above, but the article could use some work. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 18:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article doesn't have much info on this more than one line in a table. If it's not notable enough to have more than a brief mention on the general article about the topic then surely it's not notable enough for ITN.  Nixinova TC   21:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Masem - it's not a rare event. Banedon (talk) 22:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    CLARIFICATION: Masem said it wasn't a "super rare" event, and it won't happen again for 20 years. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 22:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I've reopened this nomination, which I felt was closed prematurely. Although I !voted oppose, 5v3 is not 'clear consensus', the nomination has been open for less than 24 hours, and the outcome could change if there is substantial expansion of the article (or creation of a new one). Let this one play out a bit longer. Modest Genius talk 11:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The article is updated, the subject has some news coverage, the article is okay. Yes, it's not world-changing, but neither are the rote violence and protests that we post on ITN. We can call this a genuinely rare event that will not be repeated anytime soon without running afould of CRYSTAL.130.233.2.197 (talk) 11:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't see any prose update in the article. The 2019 event just has one line in a data table. Modest Genius talk 12:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Glad this was reopened. It is a sufficiently rare astronomical event. Definitely encyclopedic. WaltCip (talk) 12:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The specific occurrence doesn't even seem to merit its own article (unlike eclipses, where we generally post the stand-alone article about the event). The information about this transit appears to be confined to a date in a chart. There's just not enough Wikipedia content about this event to make it worth posting to the main page. If there were a sizable stand-alone article, or at least a several-paragraph section in a more general article, I could support it. However, there is not enough there there. --Jayron32 13:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A Mercury of transit
  • Oppose – Consensus against on ephemeral nature of (past) event, lack of general visibility and lack of wider significance. – Sca (talk) 14:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I had to add 36 {{
    cn|date=November 2019}} tags because I already warned about unsourced information earlier, but it was not fixed. starship.paint (talk) 14:42, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
But on the plus side, it could be illustrated with this pic. – Sca (talk) 23:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC) →[reply]
Comment IMHO requesting sources for
Common sense guess would work better. If a meteorite would start falling, or aliens from alternate dimension would be invading, the last thing you probably would be doing, is requiring news sources for claims. As for this transit, when it did occur, you as well probably could watch it happen: you don't get a transit or eclipse everyday, and well since this discussion haven't gathered much in favor for notability of a rare event, it may be closed, but is to be taken into account when next transit/eclipse is about to occur, so probably best to note such events as ITN/R criteria. --Arseny1992 (talk) 20:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
@Arseny1992: - in my view as a layperson in this field, nothing unsourced in the article fits simple obvious claims such as "1+1 equals 2." You can't expect our readers to be versed in astronomy. If you can find something to disprove my assertion, post it. starship.paint (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose I sort of want to see this on the main page since it's not common by any measure, but there's no way an article on this would have enough data, as seen through the linked article not even being specific to the date. Pie3141527182 (talk) 23:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 11

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Law and crime
Politics and elections

Science and technology

RD: Charles Rogers (American football)

Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CBS News

Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: C Class article with excellent sourcing DBigXray 15:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) RD: James Le Mesurier

Article: James Le Mesurier (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Independent
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
White Helmets volunteer organization. Responses section needs a neutrality fix and there's one unsourced sentence in the "Work with the White Helmets" section, but other than that it looks good. ミラP 22:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

  • Comment I've just edited the article a bit, adding more sourced information about his work with the White Helmets, and deleting an unsourced and incomplete sentence in that section. RebeccaGreen (talk) 01:14, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – Looks good now. Significant improvements made. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 08:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The information in paretheses under Military service surely means something, but it's lost on ENGVAR and JARGON. Presumably, he was in the military while not under command, or somesuch. If that was the extent of his official service, then I don't know why there should be a Military service section.130.233.2.197 (talk) 12:05, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It seems that he joined the army before he was on active service. His actual service is covered by "He was promoted to lieutenant on 11 August 1993, and to captain on 11 August 1996. He worked with the United Nations peacekeeping force in the former Yugoslavia. He retired from the military on 1 June 2000." So that's 7 years of military service, after 3 years at university sponsored by the army, and about 6 weeks on probation at Sandhurst. Perhaps that section could be edited to make that a bit clearer. RebeccaGreen (talk) 12:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delay until article is more settled. I'm not experienced with ITN proposals, but with the Turkish media talking about his wife saying Le Mesurier was thinking of suicide 15 days before his death and was on psychiatric medication, it looks like there likely will be significant messy developments before too long. I wouldn't add such stuff at the moment on WP:BLP and WP:RS grounds, but here is an example. Rwendland (talk) 16:06, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transit of Mercury

Article: No article specified
Blurb: No blurb specified (Post)

| article = Transit of Mercury | article2 = | image = | blurb = Mercury transits the Sun. | recent deaths = no | ongoing = yes | altblurb = | altblurb2 = | altblurb3 = | altblurb4 = | sources = The Independent, timeanddate.com | updated = | updated2 = | creator = | updater = | updater2 = | updater3 = | ITNR = no | nom cmt = Currently ongoing. Quite rare astronomical event. | nominator = Arseny1992 | sign = Arseny1992 (talk) 13:29, 11 November 2019 (UTC) }}[reply]

  • Support It is not a super rare event (last was 3 yrs ago, next is about 20) but this is along the lines of total eclipses and the like, so fair enough to post. --Masem (t) 14:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
According to that article, the next transit of Mercury is projected for 2032 Nov 13, which is 13 years from now. Banedon (talk) 22:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - the article is not up to standard, several unsourced data in tables, sentences or even paragraphs. starship.paint (talk) 14:47, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    @Arseny1992: - I suggest you improve the article by citing sources for all information in text or tables. starship.paint (talk) 15:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, there seems to be no prose about this specific transit, and the pattern of the article suggests there never will be any. --LukeSurl t c 15:41, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose. Whilst this is indeed a rare event (next one is in 2032), and I've been watching a live stream of it, at this point it's little more than trivia. All the science that can be obtained from such events was extracted centuries ago. ITN did post 2012 transit of Venus, but that event got a lot more public attention and a stand-alone article. That's even more true of total eclipses, which still have difficulty filling an article with useful information. Other than 'rare event happened exactly as predicted', it's not clear what could be said about this transit. There's certainly no substantial new content in transit of Mercury (currently just a tense change). Creating a new article and getting it into DYK would be better than putting the generic article in ITN. Modest Genius talk 15:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Well as this transit is about to end soon, so no point to post on ITN now. As astronomical events can be predicted to eternity into the future, this probably needs to be posted on ITN/R instead and be notified in due time without short notice before one occur (be it a transit or any type of eclipse). --Arseny1992 (talk) 15:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, call for close Didn't seem particularly important, and is (almost) over now. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 17:50, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm not sure why something described by a reliable source as an ""incredibly rare celestial event" should be snow-closed. It won't happen for another 20-odd years. ITN does cover events that have completed, so no reason to just shut this down. Probably as notable (and indeed rarer) as many other predictable celestial events, such a total eclipse. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 18:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support as notable as eclipses etc, and rare, as noted above, but the article could use some work. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 18:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Article doesn't have much info on this more than one line in a table. If it's not notable enough to have more than a brief mention on the general article about the topic then surely it's not notable enough for ITN.  Nixinova TC   21:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Masem - it's not a rare event. Banedon (talk) 22:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    CLARIFICATION: Masem said it wasn't a "super rare" event, and it won't happen again for 20 years. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 22:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I've reopened this nomination, which I felt was closed prematurely. Although I !voted oppose, 5v3 is not 'clear consensus', the nomination has been open for less than 24 hours, and the outcome could change if there is substantial expansion of the article (or creation of a new one). Let this one play out a bit longer. Modest Genius talk 11:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The article is updated, the subject has some news coverage, the article is okay. Yes, it's not world-changing, but neither are the rote violence and protests that we post on ITN. We can call this a genuinely rare event that will not be repeated anytime soon without running afould of CRYSTAL.130.233.2.197 (talk) 11:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't see any prose update in the article. The 2019 event just has one line in a data table. Modest Genius talk 12:58, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Glad this was reopened. It is a sufficiently rare astronomical event. Definitely encyclopedic. WaltCip (talk) 12:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The specific occurrence doesn't even seem to merit its own article (unlike eclipses, where we generally post the stand-alone article about the event). The information about this transit appears to be confined to a date in a chart. There's just not enough Wikipedia content about this event to make it worth posting to the main page. If there were a sizable stand-alone article, or at least a several-paragraph section in a more general article, I could support it. However, there is not enough there there. --Jayron32 13:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A Mercury of transit
  • Oppose – Consensus against on ephemeral nature of (past) event, lack of general visibility and lack of wider significance. – Sca (talk) 14:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I had to add 36 {{
    cn|date=November 2019}} tags because I already warned about unsourced information earlier, but it was not fixed. starship.paint (talk) 14:42, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
But on the plus side, it could be illustrated with this pic. – Sca (talk) 23:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC) →[reply]
Comment IMHO requesting sources for
Common sense guess would work better. If a meteorite would start falling, or aliens from alternate dimension would be invading, the last thing you probably would be doing, is requiring news sources for claims. As for this transit, when it did occur, you as well probably could watch it happen: you don't get a transit or eclipse everyday, and well since this discussion haven't gathered much in favor for notability of a rare event, it may be closed, but is to be taken into account when next transit/eclipse is about to occur, so probably best to note such events as ITN/R criteria. --Arseny1992 (talk) 20:26, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
@Arseny1992: - in my view as a layperson in this field, nothing unsourced in the article fits simple obvious claims such as "1+1 equals 2." You can't expect our readers to be versed in astronomy. If you can find something to disprove my assertion, post it. starship.paint (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose I sort of want to see this on the main page since it's not common by any measure, but there's no way an article on this would have enough data, as seen through the linked article not even being specific to the date. Pie3141527182 (talk) 23:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Politics and elections

Sports

RD: Noel Ignatiev

Article: Noel Ignatiev (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): New Yorker, LA Times
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
How the Irish Became White —Collint c 03:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

(Posted) RD: Rick Ludwin

Article: Rick Ludwin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): USA Today
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see

Nominator's comments: TV executive best known for his support of Seinfeld Teemu08 (talk) 22:34, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

  •  Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:58, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish general election

Article: November 2019 Spanish general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Spanish Socialist Workers' Party wins the most seats in the November general election but fails to obtain majority as the People's Party and the far-right Vox gain many seats. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The Spanish Socialist Workers' Party wins the most seats in the second general election in Spain, but does not gain a majority.
News source(s): BBC, The Guardian, El País
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
talk) 01:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

  • There is a small prose summary at the November 2019 Spanish general election#Aftermath. What I said is that a summary is not needed in the "Results" section, because all sources depict results with tables and, frankly, there is little sense in trying to describe with words what is already better described through a sourced table. Impru20talk 05:42, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Resignation of Bolivian gov't; Jeanine Áñez becomes president-designate

Proposed image
Articles: 
forced to resign amid accusations of electoral fraud and military pressure.
News source(s): (BBC News) (CBS News) (Financial Times)
---- more sources coming soon, still on Live TV
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Sources coming soon. --CoryGlee (talk) 21:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support in principle, but Morales's resignation is barely mentioned in the article right now. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 21:19, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's totally true, I am working on it along other users users, but it's as hot as a hot dog. Not much info apart from the military pressure. --CoryGlee (talk) 21:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - This is major news. Articles seems ready to be posted. BabbaQ (talk) 22:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on the merits, should the blurb mention that the VP resigned too(as we don't know who is in charge yet). 331dot (talk) 22:19, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Generally a change of head of state is regarded as ITNR as well(though, again, we don't know who it is changing to yet). 331dot (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
331dot Hi my friend, as I said, it's so hot the news that it's overwhelming TV, I've just heard that military authorities have ordered the arrest of Morales. Too many changes at any moment. --CoryGlee (talk) 22:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait until we know who has taken over. Also I'm not wild about the blurb which seems to imply this was a military coup. It should reference the ongoing protests what the hell is going on -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support and added alt. Kingsif (talk) 22:44, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Kingsif Hi my friend, Jorge Faurie, Foreign Minister of Argentina made it clear on TN (Todo Noticias) TV channel, that Argentina would not grant asylum to Morales. That should be dismissed. :) ----- --CoryGlee (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa! Coup d'état is a very loaded term. We would need very widespread, near unanimous, use of that term in reliable secondary sources to use it in wiki voice. The title of the new article is highly problematic. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I never suggested it was a coup. I didn't add that. --CoryGlee (talk) 22:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I only edited the article; it does really depend on who takes over as to whether it's a coup, but since it was the military turning on Morales, it's at least in the ballpark. edit: update to say that sources are citing or openly using the term because of the police action at least; sources added to article. Kingsif (talk) 22:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I think the blurb should include the fact that Morales resigned under pressure from the military. (Morales says he was not given a choice.) So I prefer the original blurb. Davey2116 (talk) 23:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose "Coup d'état"? Really? Morales disrespected his people will expressed in the
    talk) 00:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
SirEdimon, my original nomination article target was 2019 Bolivian protests. I don't know who changed it and I don't understand it. It's been confirmed that Gen. Williams Kaliman suggested him to resign but not confirmed he launched a coup. --CoryGlee (talk) 00:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Oh, I see. My opinion was about the article
talk) 00:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Support blurb - Agree that shorter is better, but I’d go with the alt blurbs too. Article appears to be in good shape. Suggest timely post. Jusdafax (talk) 04:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on notability. Hrodvarsson (talk) 04:27, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted the first alt-blurb as I think the successor is important. I'm about to put Morales' picture in the queue for protection. Thryduulf (talk) 10:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I believe the current blurb reads as if the protesters forced the government to resign. According to all sources this is not the case; the military forced the government to resign. Even as we justifiably agree not to use the term 'coup' as of now, we still cannot avoid the facts of the case. Davey2116 (talk) 06:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: T. N. Seshan

Article: T. N. Seshan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Times of India
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former Chief Election Commissioner of India who brought significant changes and electoral reforms. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

@Kees08: Please reconsider your vote. Article is updated. -Nizil (talk) 07:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as updater. Article needs some copyediting and some more info in Career section. -Nizil (talk) 07:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted. Thryduulf (talk) 11:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Cyclone Bulbul

Proposed image
Article: 
Cyclone Bulbul hits the Bay of Bengal. (Post)
News source(s): BBC

Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Very Severe Cyclonic Storm. Sherenk1 (talk) 02:16, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose for now – A bit too early to tell if this is worth posting. Bangladesh is notorious for catastrophic cyclones, but we don't have enough info at present. ~ Cyclonebiskit (chat) 03:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait per Cyclonebiscuit. This might turn out to be a massively significant storm, but it isn't one currently. Thryduulf (talk) 11:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - 18 have died as of now, updated blurb. Sherenk1 (talk) 02:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - the storm is now sufficiently significant and the article is in fairly good shape. NorthernFalcon (talk) 08:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - might help people to get information around it at this juncture much . Devopam (talk) 08:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - and good to go now.BabbaQ (talk) 23:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Posted — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:32, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 9

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Neutro Shorty concert stampede

Article: Neutro Shorty concert stampede (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Four teenagers are killed, and over 50 injured, in a stampede at a park concert in Caracas, Venezuela. (Post)
News source(s): El País VPItv
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Not much more to say - lots of teenagers trying to get in early, crushing each other. All deceased age 14. Kingsif (talk) 22:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • While I don't challenge the oppose, I guess it's "only" three four deaths, I do want to ask why you think it's trivia. A human stampede on Saturday is certainly news, no? And I can't imagine it serves better at DYK... Kingsif (talk) 22:46, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's a very low loss of life, we've had many many articles about stampedes with higher death tolls that weren't considered particularly newsworthy. Venezuela even had a stampede just last year with many more killed. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 13:44, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This type of events aren't common in Venezuela, with the exception of
    talk) 23:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Support Article is of sufficient quality to appear on the main page. --Jayron32 13:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I want to warn against systemic bias that tends to take place among !voters when news stories of stampedes start popping up. There's often a subconscious assumption that these happen only in developing countries and that therefore the bar to posting should be much higher for those same countries. That should not distract from how individually newsworthy these events are, or how uncommon they can be in specific regions.--WaltCip (talk) 13:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Newsworthy event and article is in decent shape. There is no reason to assume that stampedes at concerts happen so often that it is trivial to report on it (Category:Human stampedes in 2019 only contains three articles and the other two are not related to musical acts). Other such disasters, such as Love Parade disaster, were featured in ITN as well. As a side note, I'm surprised that a band that is so popular that people trample each other to see it has no article yet. Regards SoWhy 13:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Walt's point is well taken - human stampedes happen everywhere. Note the deaths of 3 in anglophone Ireland this year was not even nominated. If we are not going to post every stampede, it follows that we will post only those with large body counts or larger context (government inaction, etc). This has neither. GreatCaesarsGhost 13:47, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • How many are there? Do we have an article that tells us? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:50, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Indeed we do. They're frequent enough that I don't think a stampede that kills 4 is blurbable per se. GreatCaesarsGhost 18:45, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Thanks. I tend to agree. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I'm unsure that this rises to the scale of ITN. We didn't post the similar one in Ireland not long ago, and the article isn't particularly great either. Black Kite (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2019 United Kingdom floods

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ An ongoing flood that is happening in Sheffield and Derbyshire in the United Kingdom (Post)
News source(s): BBC

Credits:

Article updated
 LC1829 (talk) 16:49, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose unless this flood gets much worse. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – RS coverage seems scant outside UK or maybe EU. – Sca (talk) 17:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, at least at present. It's causing localised disruption but they're not the worst floods in the UK in the recent past and (so far at least) have only resulted in 1 death. We can revisit this if they go on for a prolonged time and/or get significantly worse. Thryduulf (talk) 21:53, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The flooding has now largely subsided [12] and while the one death is tragic I don’t think the flood is ITN level of significance. The article is still a stub as well. P-K3 (talk) 22:19, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Didn't reach the level of notoriety for the front page I feel. I wasn't directly affected by the floods but it was more the "shock" value of it that made it newsworthy.--Trans-Neptunian object (talk) 23:22, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) Kartarpur corridor

Proposed image
Article: 
Sikh pilgrims visa-free access to Gurdwara Darbar Sahib (pictured) for the first time since the partition.
News source(s): Dawn

Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: This was also nominated in November last year. Guy in the Mall (talk) 10:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support in principle – A welcome change to our usual postings and a marked change to the state of India–Pakistan relations. I am not sure about the wording of the blurb though. Seems one-sided. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 10:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment needs copyedit "Pakistan constructed 4.7 KM of dedicated expressways, including 800 meter bridge over the River Ravi". Nolo on notability. --LaserLegs (talk) 11:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Added alt blurb. Article looks good. Sherenk1 (talk) 11:29, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Of doubtful general interest. – Sca (talk) 13:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Even NYT & BBC are carrying the news of this significant development but oppose using Alt2 as the flow of pilgrims is only one-sided. So giving equal weight to both countries would be a total eyewash. Bigfoot Yeti (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    I doubt the word "historic" will ever appear on the Main Page. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 15:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    What do you think of the other alt blurb I wrote above? It's a bit wordy but I think it addresses this issue. Mount Patagonia (talk) 17:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Nice. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 19:00, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt 3. Banedon (talk) 22:18, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt 3. Important to the international conflict in that region as a positive sign of change. --Masem (t) 03:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Such a goodwill from Imran Khan while the tensions remain high in the region. STSC (talk) 08:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Border corridor between two nuclear nations and undergoing rough diplomatic relations at the same time. Mods please post it now.Regards,
    theTigerKing  11:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Support it is a major news, no problems in the article that can prevent this from mainpage. Added the names of Kautilya3 and DiplomatTesterMan as updaters. Good work guys. --DBigXray 12:14, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not ready until the article gets a copy edit for grammar. Can't have stuff like "In 2019, Pakistan army placed a bomb on display," or "Pakistan constructed 4.7 km of dedicated expressways, including 800 meter bridge over the River Ravi" linked from the main page. Close, but not ready. --LaserLegs (talk) 14:42, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed those sentences, I think. Kinda hard to see an issue if you don't explain the issue. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 16:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support alt 3-- BoothSift 02:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 02:53, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Ayodhya dispute

Article: Ayodhya dispute (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ India's Supreme Court makes a long-awaited ruling on a disputed religious site in the northern holy city of Ayodhya. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The disputed holy site of Ayodhya in northern India should be given to Hindus who want a temple built there, the country's Supreme Court has ruled.
Alternative blurb II: ​ In an unanimous decision, the Indian Supreme Court rules the disputed holy site in the northern city of Ayodhya should be given to the Hindus.
Alternative blurb III: ​ The Supreme Court of India delivers a unanimous verdict in favor of the construction of a Hindu temple at the disputed holy site in Ayodhya.
News source(s): BBC, AP, Reuters, Guardian
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Long awaited ruling. Sherenk1 (talk) 05:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind it's relating to one country, my main point is the event has no global significance, nor even regional significance. STSC (talk) 09:20, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Thich Tri Quang

Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Thanh Nien, BBC

Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Vietnamese monk who led protests in South Vietnam from 1963-66 during which there were many changes in government. Died in the evening of 8 November but this was kept secret until 9 November after the funeral. Bumbubookworm (talk) 22:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

November 8

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

2019 Mauritian general election

Article: 
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 Manish2542 (talk) 00:50, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Stale) RD: Robert Freeman

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Robert Freeman (photographer) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Deadline Hollywood
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Photographer of several of the Beatles albums and other artists. Article is not too far off in quality, but does need a good amount of sourcing. Masem (t) 23:12, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Article: Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Former Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (pictured), arrested for 580 days, has been released. (Post)
News source(s): Aljazeera, CNN, The Guardian
Credits:
 MSN12102001 (talk) 22:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Closed) Ongoing: Joker (2019 film)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Joker (2019 film) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: No blurb specified (Post)
News source(s): IndieWire, Forbes, MarketWatch, EuroNews, CNN, France24, Al Jazera
Article updated
Nominator's comments: Surprisingly, this has become the highest R-rated movie in history a month after its release. The R-rating category is quite distinct from other ones, so a record for it (as opposed to biggest movie ever is IMHO) worthwhile. Even the threats of shooters was notable. But the biggest feat of this movie is how it has ingrained itself into the culture that protests around the world use the Joker's mask. It's rare that a Hollywood movie has such a distinct cultural impact, and I think as long as it keeps popping up at protests around the world, this should be featured in ongoing. 205.175.106.108 (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Entertainment trivia w/o a blurb. It's sunny and 85 here, but I see SNOW in the forecast. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:50, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Joker_(2019_film)#Social_commentary trivia indeed /s. 205.175.106.108 (talk) 20:52, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

November 7

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) RD: Nabaneeta Dev Sen

Article: Nabaneeta Dev Sen (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): India Today
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: C Class article with excellent sourcing DBigXray 16:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) RD: Margarita Salas

Article: Margarita Salas (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): El País
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Salas has been one of the greatest and very awarded Spanish scientists, as she had a key role in DNA investigations. Alsoriano97 (talk) 10:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

November 6

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Posted) Danuvius guggenmosi

Article: Danuvius guggenmosi (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Scientists describe a new species of ancient great ape, Danuvius guggenmosi. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ A 11.6 million year old fossil found in Germany is a described as a new great ape species, Danuvius guggenmosi, which was walking upright at least 6 million years earlier than human ancestors did.
Alternative blurb II: ​ Scientists describe a new species of ancient great ape, Danuvius guggenmosi, capable of upright walking.
News source(s): Nature, Newsweek, Der Speigel, NY Times, CBC, The Guardian
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Described as capable of upright bipedal walking, challenging "the accepted idea that bipedal walking evolved much later in the ancestors of modern humans". The paper in Nature appeared yesterday. Currently tagged for further development, however. Brandmeistertalk 21:08, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: blurb does not give any hints of notability; should include "leading scientists to believe apes started walking upright X years before previously thought" or something like that.  Nixinova TC   23:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Obviously encyclopedic topic, and very exciting find! The article is short, but well referenced and gets the information across in an accessible way. Very nice to see something other than political drama and violence for once. I have added an altblurb to address the above comment.130.233.2.47 (talk) 08:35, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • The blurb(s) need work. Altblurb 1 is ready. This lineage may have evolved bipedalism earlier than our lineage, but split from us long before we evolved it. Danuvius guggenmosi made no genetic contribution to us. This discovery does not challenge any aspect of the out of Africa hypothesis, nor the timing of our evolution of any character traits. Abductive (reasoning) 09:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose apart from the unreferenced category, there's nothing in the article indicating that the description took place around this time. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 09:31, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support despite the typical pro-hominid bias at ITNC. Would we be considering this if it were a ceboidea or (god forbid) a tarsier? GreatCaesarsGhost 13:41, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I think new major primate species should be covered in ITN, and the first bipedal great ape should be covered also, since for human ancestors, this meant some 30% increase in brain capacity. 205.175.106.108 (talk) 20:51, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – I wish Madelaine Böhme et al was mentioned by name in prose. I hate how our species articles do not document who first described the species. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 10:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 23:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 5

Armed conflicts and attacks

Law and crime

Politics and elections

(Closed) Ongoing Removal: Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Nominator's comments: No mayor events here since last week. I suggest removal at this moment and a potential renomination later. --Tone 12:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC) --Tone 12:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Support removal so long as we're willing to revisit this when the public testimony starts (subject to quality article updates) --LaserLegs (talk) 12:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I'm a little confused. Did the impeachment inquiry end and I just missed it? WaltCip (talk) 12:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal as per above - Sherenk1 (talk) 12:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose this remains in the news, although major events seem slow. Banedon (talk) 12:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove and add blurb when impeachment happens. Nothing in the interim will be all that important. GreatCaesarsGhost 12:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal And I suggest that we simply blurb major events if/when they happen. After the Nth "Trump is finished" moment since November 2016, I think we should treat future such moments a little more critically and even-handedly. See:
    Ukrainian corruption conspiracy theory vs. Trump–Ukraine scandal130.233.3.131 (talk) 12:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Support Removal per others ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 12:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal nothing to see here at the moment. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 13:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Again weekends! Just yesterday there was a major development with the release of deposition transcripts. I was just considering how to incorporate that into the article. I object to this repeated attempts to remove this item while U.S. is asleep. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 14:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @
      Coffeeandcrumbs:, @Banedon: if you want this to stay in the box, just update the article. I agree the release of transcripts (and the looming start of public hearings) are noteworthy events -- just update the article and it'll stay in. --LaserLegs (talk) 14:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
      ]
  • Oppose removal There is extensive text in the article covering events of last Wednesday and Thursday, as well as Monday of this week (yesterday). The requirement for keeping something on ongoing is regular updates, which needn't be every single day; given that the news cycle often slows down on weekends (non-working days in the US), it is understandable that there will be a lull on those days. We have extensive, multiple paragraph updates about events of three of the last four weekdays. That's certainly often enough. --Jayron32 17:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Jayron32 and Coffeeandcrumbs. We need to take a breath and stop with these regular attempts to remove this from ongoing when it's pretty clear this is a major event that will continue to generate news. Short lulls over weekends are to be expected. Seriously, this is the sort of thing that "ongoing" was intended for. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. While it may ebb and flow a bit, it is clearly a major recurring news topic, and I don't see any likelihood that this is really going away soon. Seems silly to remove it now only to put it back in a week when open hearings make another burst of news. Dragons flight (talk) 17:25, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal per above.--WaltCip (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal per above. I do not understand the obsession with trying to remove events that are clearly still ongoing, and getting regular updates. Davey2116 (talk) 18:16, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal - per Jayron32, Coffeeandcrumbs and Ad Orientem. Since a consensus to remove is unlikely, I suggest closing this. Jusdafax (talk) 18:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per everyone else. The impeachment will likely reach a head around Thanksgiving, and by the end of December, it'll be time to remove it barring something extraordinary. No reason to remove it now. I don't really understand the rush to remove this. -- Rockstonetalk to me! 18:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Removed) Ongoing Removal: 2019 Turkish offensive into north-eastern Syria

Article: 2019 Turkish offensive into north-eastern Syria (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)

Nominator's comments: Only small changes to the article in the last 5 days. I suggest removal at this moment and a potential renomination later. --Tone 12:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC) --Tone 12:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support removal per nom --LaserLegs (talk) 12:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal as per above - Sherenk1 (talk) 12:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Banedon (talk) 12:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Always felt more like a blurb to me. GreatCaesarsGhost 12:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal Although the article has been updated somewhat, the details are very mundane for such an event, and if nominated as stand-alone blurbs, they would surely SNOW.130.233.3.131 (talk) 12:45, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal again per others... lots of clean up today! ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 12:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Done. Bye Bye Bye. --Jayron32 14:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Ongoing Removal: 2019 Hong Kong protests

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Nominator's comments: Oldest blurb is from 30 October. Since 31 October (5 days), two pieces of trivial information have been added: a man's ear was bitten off (who is the nihilist here?) and a statement that HK in now in recession. Updates to daughter article indicate that someone has fallen down some stairs fleeing tear gas, 6 (six!) journalists had a sit-in, in addition to other routine protest antics. No one is nominating this for AfD, but can we agree that this event can leave Ongoing? 130.233.3.131 (talk) 07:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Oppose - in the first weekend of November we already have [20] fights between police and protesters in malls leading to over 70 injuries, and [21] 325 arrests (just added to article). Sources describe [22] a chaotic weekend of protests, and that the protests [23] show no sign of abating. starship.paint (talk) 07:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Content for November in main article expanded to around 200 words. [24] Jayron32 - you requested an expansion. starship.paint (talk) 14:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal Per
    WP:ITN "In general, articles are NOT posted to ongoing merely because they are related to events that are still happening". A few lines of prose about a "chaotic weekend" added at the last minute to stave off removal without details about what actually made the weekend chaotic does not make an update. The protests may be "ongoing" but the only time the article gets an update is when someone nominates it for removal. Get it out of the box already. --LaserLegs (talk) 09:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Let’s be reasonable,
    List of November 2019 Hong Kong protests has been continually updated, and it has around 1000 words of content. Editors could easily have put that in the parent article, but possibly refrained from doing so to prevent undue weight on the most recent events. starship.paint (talk) 10:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    Oppose that article too then "Six reporters staged a silent protest at a routine press conference held by the police force." yeah that's not ongoing. --LaserLegs (talk) 11:50, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal unless a more detailed update is made to the above article. The current article has only a sentence or two update about recent events. If and when the article is updated to a more substantial description of recent events, I will change my vote. --Jayron32 11:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep. Article expansions are sufficient, article is up to date with regular events related to just about every day of the past several weeks. Checks off all of the ongoing boxes. --Jayron32 14:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal as per above - Sherenk1 (talk) 12:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal this remains very much in the news. Banedon (talk) 12:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove All of life is "ongoing." The continuation of repetitive and predictable events are not even blurbable. Protesters will protest, the "police" will police them. When and if things escalate, we can bring it back. GreatCaesarsGhost 12:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support removal as it is being updated a bit, but as we move on this ongoing event seems to be becoming the norm for how people spend their weekends in HK ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 12:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – (keep) – This persistent political phenomenon remains the No. 1 problem for the world's most populous country, a single-party state – with no end in sight. – Sca (talk) 13:31, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support removal Yes, the event continues to happen, but it is no longer a major story drawing headlines every day, which is what Ongoing is meant for. Long-winded, simmering stories are not good for Ongoing. Should the situation change, we can re-add it, but right now, its like Brexit and Trump Impeachment - we know these are still happening, but not at the top of the news coverage anymore. --Masem (t) 14:13, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support (removal) - The anti-government movement maybe ongoing but the current event is not. Just incidents of thuggery and vandalism at weekends would not make the current event as "ongoing", as far as ITN is concerned. STSC (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - (keep) There is indeed much to add as there are planned future protests, and just a few days ago one protester fell off a buidling and got critically injured. The daughter artice of the page is getting constantly edited as well, with more and more content being added to it. It can be seen that the protest might escalate again. There is always something new to add. For yout information, Hong Kong protests still manage to stay in the news. Therefore, I strongly believe that this article can stay in ITN. Asd34567 (talk) 15:35, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Constantly being updated, still being one of the biggest crisis ever to have happened in Hong Kong and China. Development of the protests have been extremely volatile and will likely escalate once again if the student falling "some stairs fleeing tear gas" didn't get better from his severe brain injuries. OceanHok (talk) 15:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment this is the third time that this story has been a candidate for removal and only saved when someone updated it after being nominated here -- "The purpose of the ongoing section is to maintain a link to a continuously updated" this feels like "punctuated updates" I'm not sure it really qualifies for continued inclusion --LaserLegs (talk) 16:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Dude, again with the "gotcha" comment: Who cares that someone made the article better after it was brought up for removal. We aren't trying to "catch" people doing anything nefarious here. We're trying to make articles better. No one loses because the article was improved when someone brought up the issue here. Maybe you should back off on these objections, and instead congratulate all of the editors who worked diligently to get the article up to standard. What's it to you if the article got better? Isn't that the entire point of this discussion? --Jayron32 17:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal again, per above. The article is still being adequately updated. Davey2116 (talk) 18:14, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal -- it's still an ongoing event. -- Rockstonetalk to me! 18:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose removal this is very much still in the news, with new events occurring regularly. This continues to make headlines around the world, so I don't see why we should remove it when people are likely going to be coming here looking for answers about it. --PlasmaTwa2 19:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Removed) Ongoing Removal: 2019 Chilean protests

Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item removal (Post)
Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Oldest blurb is from 30 October. Since 31 October (5 days), no new information has been added to this article. Some amount of NPOV tag warring. 130.233.3.131 (talk) 06:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

November 4

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents
  • The Niagara Parks Commission says the wreckage of the Niagara Scow, stuck in the rapids above Niagara Falls since 1918 before being moved downstream about 164 feet due to a strong storm, is being monitored as it moves closer to the edge of the falls, but that the scow could be stuck in its new position for "days or years." (Sky News) (CTV News)

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports

(Closed) Al Ahed FC

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
April 25 to win the AFC Cup
Alternative blurb II: ​ In football, Al-Ahed become the first Lebanese side to win an international competition
Alternative blurb III: ​ In football, by winning the AFC Cup, Al-Ahed become the first Lebanese side to win an international competition
News source(s): The AFC.com, Fox Sports Asia, FaLebanon

Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: a current event Nehme1499 (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose secondary to the top-tier AFC Champions League Stephen 00:06, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose We don't typically post this. – Ammarpad (talk) 04:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This is a second-tier competition in one of the weakest confederations. Football already gets plenty of coverage in ITN (see
    WP:ITNR); the Copa Libertadores and UEFA Champions League are the only continental club competitions that are worth posting. Modest Genius talk 12:07, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Ok I won't argue with this, I wasn't aware of
WP:ITNR when posting the nomination. Nehme1499 (talk) 12:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Note, that not being on the ITNR list does not preclude this from being posted - it just means that the nomination should illustrate the impact/importance of the event explicitly. Notable firsts, broken records, etc. can all be used to get a non-ITNR event posted. I don't see any for this particular nomination, but don't let that discourage you from making non-ITNR nominations in the future.130.233.3.131 (talk) 12:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a couple of alternative phrases. Nehme1499 (talk) 16:26, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I dont see the article supporting either blurb II and III, or should it read "the international competition" instead of "an international competition". That aside, I need evidence of coverage from non-sports publications to justify a blurb.—Bagumba (talk) 04:26, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Gay Byrne

Article: Gay Byrne (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-50289744
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Enormously important broadcaster in Ireland Kevin McE (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

LeBarón family massacre

Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Nine American Mexicans were killed and six were injured after gunmen opened fire on a three cars convoy near the US border. (Post)
News source(s): The New York Times The Washington Post CNN

Credits:

Nominator's comments: Also known a the Sonora massacre, significant coverage. While murders in the Mexican Drug War are common, deaths of American citizens aren't. Victims were members of the LeBarón family and some were burned alive. Impact in the US-Mexico diplomatic relations. 

talk) 23:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

November 3

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

Politics and elections

Sports

(Posted) RD: Yvette Lundy

Article: Yvette Lundy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian [25], Le Monde [26], France Bleu [27]
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Member of French resistance, concentration camp survivor and testifier, recipient of the Legion of Honour, died aged 103. RebeccaGreen (talk) 09:57, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

2019 New York City Marathon

Proposed image
Articles: Geoffrey Kamworor (talk · history · tag) and Joyciline Jepkosgei (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Geoffrey Kamworor and Joyciline Jepkosgei, both of Kenya, win the men's and women's races of the 2019 New York City Marathon, respectively. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At the New York City Marathon, Kenyans Geoffrey Kamworor and Joyciline Jepkosgei (pictured) win the men's and women's foot races, respectively.
News source(s): NY Times
Credits:

One or both nominated events are listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Both winners articles look alright. Topic is ITN/R ~mike_gigs talkcontribs 13:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment The 2019 race should be the bold link, not the winners. Added alt blurb patterned after 2019 Boston Marathon.—Bagumba (talk) 15:34, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2019 Formula One World Championship

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Proposed image
Articles: 2019 Formula One World Championship (talk · history · tag) and Lewis Hamilton (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Lewis Hamilton wins the 2019 Formula One World Championship at the 2019 United States Grand Prix. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Formula One, Lewis Hamilton wins the World Championship while Mercedes wins the Constructors' Championship.
News source(s): Official website Autosport
Credits:

One or both nominated events are listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: Pretty noteworthy since this is Lewis's 6th title, which puts him one title behind Schumacher's record. jaclar0529 (talk) 10:44, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Comment I didn't read all of Lewis Hamilton but the 2019 season has a one sentence update. 2019 Formula One World Championship tagged and missing refs. 2019 United States Grand Prix no prose. Needs work. --LaserLegs (talk) 12:40, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    The ITNR instructions say we should be featuring the winner of the Championship (Hamilton) and the winner of the Constructors' (Mercedes), so the altblurb is what should be given your consideration. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 12:53, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Shouldn't Mercedes's WCC win have been a separate INT post since they won it at the previous race? jaclar0529 (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait. There are still two more races left in the season, and ITNR is for the conclusion of the series. Although Hamilton and Mercedes now have unassailable leads, the other positions have not yet been settled. We should wait for the final race; that time could also be used to improve the articles. Modest Genius talk 15:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wait per Modest Genius. We
    don't know what (if anything) significant will happen in the last two races - it's not impossible that Hamilton or Mercedes will be disqualified from the championship, someone suffer a career-ending injury (or worse), etc. Thryduulf (talk) 15:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

(Posted) RD: Ren Xuefeng

Article: Ren Xuefeng (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Radio Free Asia
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Death announced this day. The actual date of death has not been disclosed yet. Zanhe (talk) 22:40, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

(Posted) RD: Gert Boyle

Article: Gert Boyle (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): oregonlive.com
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: She led Columbia Sportswear, article looks decent to me. Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

November 2

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy
  • The
    hydraulic fracturing, also known as "fracking", a technique for the recovery of oil or gas reserves. (Reuters)

Politics and elections

Science and technology

Sports

RD: Marie Laforêt

Article: Marie Laforêt (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): RFI, Swiss Info
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
talk) 22:07, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

(Posted) RD: Walter Mercado

Template:ITN candidate

(Posted) RD: Rudy Boesch

Template:ITN candidate

  • Support Article is of good length and is well-sourced. 12zaPziP (talk) 17:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Was surprised to see a well-documented article here and not solely focused on the Survivor-related stuff. --Masem (t) 20:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Unusually solid article. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Thuliswa Nkabinde-Khawe

Template:ITN candidate

  • Oppose – Stub-ish article. Can we add a couple more sentences about her career? I also could not verify the birth date and birth place when doing a spot check. We need to add more in-line citations. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 14:17, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Re I have tried to do a little bit of improvements. I derived her birth date from her ID number found here. The first six digits are usually the person's birth date (YYMMDD) and in this case, her ID number's first six digits were "730104", meaning she was born on 4 January 1973. She joined the provincial legislature in May 2009 and served as head of a few committees prior to her appointment as an MEC (provincial minister) in May 2019. She was barely in the post for five months before she passed away, so there was not actually time for her to do a lot, but she was married to a very prominent politician in Gauteng, Jacob Khawe. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 17:42, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
Please
cite your sources for birth date and birth place in the article. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 05:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]

(Posted) 2019 Rugby World Cup

Template:ITN candidate

Agreed
Template:U... This world is so Americentric and Wikipedia is no exception. comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 18:00, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Posted using a combination of Alt2 (per ENGVAR) and Alt1. Black Kite (talk) 20:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question could you put the Strasburg image back in till tomorrow morning since it was bumped for 2 days ... or head over to
    WT:ITN
    and lets get this image swapping habit either codified or killed?
    Really no need. MVP Strasburg had two shots at the main page, that's more than enough for local sports competition. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 21:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Fine, not a hill to die on. I do wish we would just leave the images alone from now on. Cheers TRM. --LaserLegs (talk) 22:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Well FWIW I agree, it all started with the Nobel Prize bonkers behaviour where it was virtually impossible to say who was going to feature next. But someone knew I suppose. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 07:23, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 1

Template:Cot
Portal:Current events/2019 November 1
Template:Cob


(Closed) Kincade Fire, 2019 California power shutoffs

Template:Archive top Template:ITN candidate

Template:Archive bottom