Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates/September 2014

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This page is an archive and its contents should be preserved in their current form;
any comments regarding this page should be directed to Wikipedia talk:In the news. Thanks.

September 30

Armed conflicts and attacks

Art and culture

Health

Law and crime

RD: Jerrie Mock

Article: Jerrie Mock (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Columbus Dispatch
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
talk to me 16:04, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Just wanted to add I agree with TRM that improvement in references is needed. 331dot (talk) 19:52, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely notable enough - but as stated, references need a lot of TLC. Challenger l (talk) 00:48, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Not impressed with aviation "round the world" record claims. Those aiming for it are not required to cross the equator nor even to travel a distance equal to the full circumference of the earth. Neither Mock's article nor the reference allegedly supporting her "round the world" achievement tell us where she actually went. She obviously achieved a lot, but this is a crappily defined achievement. Can we drop that claim and just describe her as a great aviator? HiLo48 (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would completely agree if we were the ones making the claim, but that is what the sources in the article state, along with the aviation clubs mentioned in the article who accepted her accomplishments as a record. You have completely valid points- but they should be addressed to those who recognize this accomplishment as a record or achievement. As long as the relevant groups and sources recognize this as a record, we should state that they do. 331dot (talk) 23:23, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • You're advocating we post this on
    WP:ATTRIBUTE then, and that requires a blurp that calls her a great aviator according to Aviatrix Weekly or Airborne Heiresses. When we can't even objectively define what she did we can't claim she qualifies under any of the criteria. We are not forced by vague sources to ignore that any more than we are forced to list the first person to ride across the us on a lawnmower as a great lawnmowerist. μηδείς (talk) 00:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]

September 29

Armed conflicts and attacks
  • War in Donbass
    • Renewed clashes around the Donetsk International Airport between the pro-Russian rebels and Ukrainian government troops kill at least 12 people in the worst flareup of violence since the ceasefire accord earlier in September. (CBC)
International Relations
  • Argentina's central bank announces that it will pay the holders of its restructured debt Tuesday. Implicitly this indicates that it is ready to defy a U.S. federal court which has blocked such payments until the holders of hold-out bonds are included. (Reuters)

Politics and Elections

[Closed] US judge finds Argentina in contempt of court

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Argentine debt restructuring (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ US judge finds Argentina in contempt of court (Post)
News source(s): Bloomberg
Credits:
 Count Iblis (talk) 02:07, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I'm not convinced this is sufficiently significant, given that it is a decision of a first-instance judge in a case where Argentina denies the jurisdiction of the court and where the decision is likely to be largely symbolic because enforcement of the judgment will probably be precluded by the sovereign immunity that attaches to most property of the Argentine Government within the jurisdiction. Neljack (talk) 03:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment what is the significance of this finding? It's not clear from the nomination that this has any kind of impact anywhere. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:19, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Seeing very little news coverage of this. Also not clear on the impact or significance. This is not a case in an international body(which might have more significance) 331dot (talk) 10:28, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 28

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Politics and elections

Sports

[Posted] Occupy Central with Love and Peace

Proposed image
Article: Occupy Central with Love and Peace (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Hong Kong police resorts to tear gas to disperse Occupy Central protesters occupying government headquarters, but thousands remain. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Benny Tai announces that Occupy Central is launched as Hong Kong's government headquarters is being occupied by thousands of protesters.
News source(s): (The Guardian), (Reuters UK)
Credits:

Article updated

 --Neelix (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The alternative article and blurb you propose look good to me. Neelix (talk) 21:49, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure whether that's true or not, but this is certain getting more media attention. Formerip (talk) 23:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
New York Times, The Globe and Mail, BBC, ABC, Wall Street Journal, CBC, Forbes, Fox, and plenty more. This thing is in the news in nearly all the main places except Wikipedia. Neelix (talk) 02:47, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The relevant article is now called 2014 Hong Kong protests. Neelix (talk) 02:51, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
True. Being a Hongkonger, I have to say protests are extremely common in Hong Kong. But this is a serious case.--Good afternoon (talk) 12:49, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I know about the past protests. But the world is used to pro-democracy protests taking place in countries that are far less democratic than even the OCwLP people would describe Hong Kong as. And there's the implications for China as a whole. Daniel Case (talk) 14:09, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
HK is that place where "it's not democratic enough" but "people are somehow free to protest" that's ripe for "pro-democracy protests" (see also Venezuela, Malaysia). In places where there's supposedly "democracy" people don't have to do "pro-democracy protests" (they'd protest about something else), and there are places where protests are not even allowed at all. HK is the perfect candidate for such protests to happen, and they're doing it quite frequently. –HTD 15:05, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Hugely important event that could change the political landscape of Hong Kong forever. WinterWall (talk) 03:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Gained international media attention. Also, I have changed the caption to a clearer one. --Good afternoon (talk) 08:43, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The media is already calling these events an "umbrella revolution", [6], [7], [8]. Nsk92 (talk) 10:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. This protest seems to have enough legs both literally and figuratively to have an encyclopedic value. Rhodesisland (talk) 11:33, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Smurrayinchester 15:05, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revise blurb - is "using tear gas" the best we could come up with for the blurb? I don't recall any protests in recent memory to be framed in such a way. Would it not be more informative to the reader to say what the protests are actually about? Such as "Protesters gather in Hong Kong to demonstrate against proposed electoral changes announced by the Chinese government." Also I would consider putting this story in "on-going" as it is still developing. Colipon+(Talk) 16:18, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
How about "
electoral changes are countered by the police using tear gas." That way, we make the protests more generally, but still mention the police response (which is the main story in the West, it seems). Also, we don't need an "Ongoing" as long as there's an entry in ITN - Ongoing is for when stories are still in the news by the time they reach the bottom of the page. Smurrayinchester 20:23, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
I don't think the tear gas is the western story. The story is the protest, with the context of Tiananmen Square etc. The tear gas is just a red herring, stupid over-reaction. I prefer the Colipon blurb. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:28, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I second TRM's preference for the "Colipon" blurb. RGloucester 20:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment- I too support Colipon's blurb and believe it should be posted as there is consensus for it, but disagree with Ongoing. Ongoing was not made for every event that is not instantaneous, only for the most important events that consistently have new stories each day. Only Ebola and IS meet that criteria right now. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 01:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revised. I posted the Colipon blurb, as annotated by Vejvančický. Dragons flight (talk) 02:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Posted] 2014 Ryder Cup

Article: 2014 Ryder Cup (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In golf, Europe wins the Ryder Cup. (Post)
News source(s): New York Times
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on
talk to me 18:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

I could replace the content with IN THE HOLE!!! if you like. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:54, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Looks like the article now has prosein the sections describing the game. CaptRik (talk) 18:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The article is good.
    (Talk) 20:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Posted The Rambling Man (talk) 07:19, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Posted] Marathon World Record

Article: 
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 --ShakyIsles (talk) 09:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

There is also
Dennis Kimetto page needs some work.ShakyIsles (talk) 10:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Cool, I've updated to reflect this. ShakyIsles (talk) 21:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - a new world record is notable.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support A worthy sports record and the marathon is on ITN/R. It's only been a year since the last one, but I don't think that's a big deal, especially combined with the marathon (we're getting down to physical impossibility in the near future here...) IRW0 (talk) 23:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tone (talkcontribs)

September 27

Disasters and accidents
  • Japan's Mount Ontake volcano erupts causing 250 people to be stranded, injuring at least eight people and forcing aircraft to divert their routes. (Reuters)

Business and economy
  • After 139 years of ferry crossings between the Danish town of Esbjerg and Harwich in England, MS Sirena Seaways carries passengers on the route for the last time as DFDS closes the route due to "dwindling demand and high costs"; a freight service will still be available on the route from Esbjerg to Immingham. (BBC) (DFDS Connects)

Health
  • Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa
    :
    • The official death toll from the
      World Health Organisation warning that the official figures "vastly underestimate the true scale of the epidemic". (The Independent)

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections
Sport

RD: James Traficant

Article: James Traficant (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NBC News International Business Times Daily Mail
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Important to US politics for the bad things he did; convicted of bribery, only the second person since the end of the Civil War to be expelled from Congress. Died somewhat unexpectedly. RD is empty at the moment. --331dot (talk) 21:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

  • Why is being notable for crimes not important to a field? Being important isn't just for good things. Richard Nixon isn't known for the good things he did. I knew this was a longshot, but I thought the discussion was worth it. 331dot (talk) 22:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose mediocre personality with no real shot at being "top his field", no awards, nothing. Death was unexpected, but doesn't elevate this individual to the heights of Lauren Bacall etc., regardless of the emptiness of RD. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:33, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Being expelled from Congress is essentially a negative award. 331dot (talk) 22:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ok, I'll take your word for it. Doesn't change anything about the oppose at all. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:12, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can oppose for any reason- but it is wrong to say "no awards, nothing". There is clearly something; people are not expelled from Congress even once every 50 years. Only twice in 150 years. 331dot (talk) 22:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, thank you. But this is not really relevant to anything. So what if was expelled? What relevance does that have to being top of his field? Top of his field for being crap in his field? Brilliant. When you say "wrong to say "no awards, nothing" - can you clarify what actual awards he won? The Rambling Man (talk) 22:32, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Being expelled is essentially an award; a great rarity in US politics(and I'd be willing to bet somewhat rare worldwide, at a national level) equivalent to an executive branch official being impeached and removed from office. (you can see Expulsion from the United States Congress for more information if you wish) It really doesn't bother me if you or anyone oppose this, I just felt it would be better than a blank line on the main page. I truly appreciate your consideration. 331dot (talk) 22:40, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yep, fair enough, I just wouldn't rank this individual along with Lauran Bacall etc. Enough from us. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:43, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose His expulsion from the US congress was a notable event, and had ITN existed back then it would've been featured. However that happened years ago. He doesn't get to "double dip" on the same notoriety twice. WinterWall (talk) 23:00, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support probably most well known US House member during the time of his service, except Gingrich, but not other speakers, on the news nightly, widely seen as prosecuted in order to be silenced. Adding him will not bump anyone else, and it is unquestionable he will be remembered 100 years from now by anyone interested in the politics of the era. μηδείς (talk) 01:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I'd be more willing to post someone known for their enormous positive contributions to the country as a member of Congress, but being the only member expelled since the Civil War is more Congress trivia. Didn't really set a key precedent for expelling members of Congress and did not substantially change the way Congress is run (if at all). SpencerT♦C 04:41, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'll assume you're not an American old enough to remember his term in office? He's what would be called a backbencher in the loyal opposition who spoke truth to power. He regularly brought to light issues the majority parties, both Democrat and Republican didn't want raised. The fact that you describe him as basically a criminal makes it clear you are unaware he was one of the least culpable members of congress. Look, for example,at the $100,000,000.00 worth of the senior senator from Nevada, who cannot account for any of it as private earnings. Look at what Trent Lott earned from
Bernie Ebbers, and took home as legal spoils that would have landed Tony Soprano in jail. Trafficant was an inconvenient voice. We're not supposed to be here to puppet narratives.μηδείς (talk) 04:56, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
In that case, the current article (James_Traficant#U.S._House_of_Representatives) does not do a very good job explaining his Congressional contributions. For something that I would consider an equivalent standard, see Robert_Byrd#Congressional_service, describing Byrd (who was posted on ITN). If the article is better filled out and makes a better case for his importance, I will reconsider my position. SpencerT♦C 19:45, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, User:Spencer, but at this point it's a lost cause and I am basically coming here to recreate since I have real world deadlines. The big thing with TRafficant was he was on the news weekly for pointing out other's lies and hypocrises, a household name during his service, and while hated by the leaders of both parties, beloved of everyone else and continuously returned by his constituency. Byrd was just a corrupt ex-Klu-Klux-Klan member who graduated to the political boss of the landlocked state of West Virginia. μηδείς (talk) 23:16, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Not significant enough of a career to be considered "top of his field". Rhodesisland (talk) 10:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per above. The expulsion should have been here if this existed in 2002, the death shouldn't. Busy Moose (talk) 14:23, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - per 331dot and Medeis. This RD nomination is exactly what the RD slot is for: a recent death of someone notable in the news. Trafficant's death, as befit his service in Congress and his personality, was unusual. I acknowledge the concerns of opposers but am unconvinced. This would a fine RD addition. The article appears to be in good shape and is an interesting read. Jusdafax 18:35, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose not only does the article have an orange-level tag, but in the grand scheme of things, he was a minor politician and not one whose career merits a RD posting.
    BencherliteTalk 11:33, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]

[Posted] 2014 Mount Ontake eruption

Article: 2014 Mount Ontake eruption (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ In Japan, Mount Ontake erupts, killing at least one person and seriously injuring more than 30. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ In Japan, Mount Ontake erupts, and the bodies of at least 31 hikers are found.
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Prime Minister

talk to me 16:14, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

looks like The Rambling Man has changed his mind from the oppose he wrote above - so that might want striking out?EdwardLane (talk) 15:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, why not directly message me or ping me? 18:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Change to Support; now starting to appear as a top story in CNN, more effects seem to be coming out. 331dot (talk) 07:40, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • was coming here to nominate it based on the 30 dead - pending update obviously EdwardLane (talk) 08:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Major volcanic eruptions are still relatively rare and the death toll from this seems to be > 30 (once officially confirmed). CaptRik (talk) 08:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Maybe a little expansion of the eruptions section with the current event would help. Newsworthy nonetheless.
    (Talk) 10:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Support. Ditto The Rambling Man; it needs an update! Rhodesisland (talk) 10:38, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Definitely for ITN per coverage.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I've suggested a more suitable alt-blurb, article is a little light but once the deaths of the hikers are confirmed, and the article is updated, it should be posted ASAP. According to the BBC, there are at least 45 people "missing. Highly significant natural disaster for Japan. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - pending article update. A big story in the international news right now, but the article needs fleshing out as it is too brief as of this posting. Jusdafax 19:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Article is light but I don't think that's a problem; information is sparse. BBC simply says "The hikers were not breathing and their hearts had stopped" about the apparent deaths. I assume they are dead, but an AP image shows a medical team transporting a frozen body "for urgent medical help". [11] (That article says Japanese officials can only announce deaths after a formal doctor's examination.) IRW0 (talk) 21:04, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    31 confirmed dead: [12]. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:44, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    That only says 4 confirmed dead at the moment. ("Four people were transported back down the mountain on Sunday and later confirmed dead") The other 25+ are still "not breathing with their hearts stopped." I can't find other sources confirming those deaths yet, but I assume it'll happen soon enough. For now, we could use a blurb like "In Japan, Mount Ontake erupts, and the bodies of at least 31 hikers are found." IRW0 (talk) 22:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd suggest that "not breathing with their hearts stopped", when covered by volcanic ash, at the top of a mountain, is not a good prospect for most people. In fact, I think it's rather likely to mean death. Especially if they are not the four transported down. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not arguing they're not dead; I'm personally quite sure that they are in fact dead. But the RSes do not support calling them "dead" yet. All sources are very careful to frame it in "bodies found" or "apparently dead", etc. IRW0 (talk) 23:19, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - significant event, reported worldwide. The article as it stands now is acceptable for the main page. --
    Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 05:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Posting altblurb. Feel free to change it. --Tone 08:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 26

Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economy
Health
  • Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa
Politics and elections

[Closed] 2014 air traffic control facility fire

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nominator's comments: Caused close to 2000 airline flights to be grounded and pointed to potentially significant flaws in air traffic control security --Jax 0677 (talk) 07:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The only reported injury was the alleged arsonist, and no planes crashed. Just at ORD/MDW, a comparable number of flights were canceled after a fire at the Chicago TRACON about 4 months ago. [13] Inconvenient for some travelers, but not newsworthy. IRW0 (talk) 11:51, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Basically no similar at the end of a day to a bad weather front shutting down a number of regional airports and messing up traffic. --MASEM (t) 14:37, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose barely significant act of vandalism results in minor disruption to a minor portion travellers. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:28, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree; it was a very large act of vandalism. It disrupted quite a few travelers. You don't have to downplay the event to argue against its posting. Abductive (reasoning) 18:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. Worldwide we have around eight to ten million air travellers per day. This is a minuscule glitch. It has no real impact, it's not in the news, it's not ITN. Move on to something else. Thanks for your advice though, always welcome. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:18, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, no lasting impact. Abductive (reasoning) 18:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, unusual and worrying but, compared to the misery imposed regularly by French and Italian
    Air Traffic Control, not such a tumultuous event. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:39, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[Closed] UNGA 69

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: sixty-ninth session of the United Nations General Assembly (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The 69th session of the UNGA opens with the General Debate. (Post)
Credits:
 --Lihaas (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It definitely is in the news, buried or not: [14] It seems Mahmoud Abbas is very unhappy about Israel's negotiations with Palestine. Perhaps we could post that.
talk to me 17:54, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Cambodia Australia deal

Article: Australia–Cambodia relations#2014 refugee resettlement deal (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Cambodia and Australia sign a controversial refugee resettlement deal. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

 SovanDara 02:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment: Article update could use a little more expansion to clarify what the actual deal is; article right now just says it would "allow refugees from Australia to resettle in Cambodia". SpencerT♦C 04:09, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I might be interested if the blurb or notes associated with the nomination actually tried to explain the story. Right now, it's a no. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support- Intriguing story, article needs to be sorted out before this can run though. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 04:46, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - noteworthy story.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 25

Armed conflicts and attacks
  • Syrian Civil War
    • Several Syrian rebel groups sign an agreement to unite in the fight against the
      Islamic State of Iraq and Syria and President Bashar al-Assad's forces. (CNN)
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Politics

[Ready] Shellshock software bug reveals several severe vulnerabilities

Article: Shellshock (software bug) (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Undiscovered for 22 years, the Shellshock bug reveals several remote exploit vulnerabilities in software widely used on web servers; severity considered by some to be similar to Heartbleed. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Undiscovered for 22 years, the Shellshock bug reveals several remote exploit vulnerabilities in software widely used on Internet servers.
News source(s): NIST National Vulnerability Database (first bug), New York Times, The Register, Arstechnica, iTnews, ZDNet, etc
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: I thought this might be worthwhile news, due to the bug's severity (NIST rated it 10/10 and it can affect OpenSSH, CGI in Apache, DHCP, and possibly anything which uses Bash, such as Mac OSX, some routers, etc), possibility of unauthenticated remote code execution, the 22 years it went undiscovered (meaning old and new systems affected), further bugs discovered while trying to patch it, and reports of a botnet and malware actively exploiting this bug as of the day it went public. --Zeniff (talk) 12:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Closed] Holder resigns

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Eric Holder (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Eric Holder (pictured) announced his resignation as the United States Attorney General. (Post)
News source(s): Bloomberg and ABC News
Credits:
Nominator's comments: The subject is well-known to Americans, Canadians, and Europeans.[citation needed] People would expect who will be the next Attorney General. I welcome alternative blurbs because this is my first nomination. --George Ho (talk) 16:41, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose We've been through this before with cabinet-level individuals resigning. It happens often and does not represent any major shift in policy. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:46, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. (edit conflict) Thanks for the nomination, and welcome, but unless there is some unusual circumstance(such as being convicted of a crime/impeachment, corruption, etc.) I don't see a reason to post this, as cabinet officials carry out the policies of the President and serve at his pleasure, so there won't be a massive shift in policies here. I don't think any such official would be posted (such as the Home Secretary of the UK, Russian Foreign Minister, etc.). 331dot (talk) 16:49, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose agree with the above. Minor blip in US politics. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:51, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose that he would resign in the fall was announced earlier this year, he's not been asked or forced to resign for some scandal, we don't post such routine resignations for other countries. μηδείς (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Eh, he was planning to resign at the end of the year no matter what. This was not due to some scandal of some sort. –HTD 17:12, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 24

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents
  • At least 55 people are dead as a result of
    mudslides in northeast India following days of heavy rain. (Sky News)

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections
  • Venezuela's opposition parties named Jesus Torrealba, a 56-year-old journalist and teacher, to head their coalition ahead of 2015 parliamentary elections where they hope to weaken President Maduro's socialist government. (Voice of America)

Science and technology

Sports
  • In
    Kevin Ward, Jr. during an August sprint car race. The prosecutor also reveals that Ward was under the influence of marijuana at the time of the accident. (ESPN)

[Posted] Mars Orbiter Mission

Proposed image
Article: 
ISRO probe Mars Orbiter Mission, India's first interplanetary craft, both enter orbit around Mars.
News source(s): spaceflightnow.com

Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Space probes reaching their destination are ITNR. MAVEN arrived a few days ago perhaps a combined blurb? I welcome advice on the blurb. Hektor (talk) 05:29, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

  • Support combined blurb The Rambling Man (talk) 06:05, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Suggested a combined blurb. If it's too long, the "India's first interplanetary craft" part could be left out. Smurrayinchester 06:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support A combined blurb would be better, especially since this is huge for India and it's around the same time as the NASA probe. I do think it should be noted that this is India's first probe (since again, it is a momentous achievement for any nation), and I wouldn't support not having it in there.
    talk) 06:56, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Support - per Kevin. Jusdafax 07:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment When the orange tag is gone, ready to post. --Tone 07:39, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:NOTROCKETSCIENCE Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per Kevin Rutherford. CaptRik (talk) 08:03, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support separate blurp Since this is India's first attempt, and a first successful one in a first try. --Samuelled (talk) 09:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support combined blurb, now that the maintainence tags are gone.128.214.53.18 (talk) 11:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posting. --Tone 12:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support separate blurp Note that these two are two separate missions. Unlike US Open or some tounament where you can combine two accomplisments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kinderlander (talkcontribs) 12:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • The combined blurb is fine - yes, separate missions but to "waste" another line to say "another probe entered Mars orbit" is inefficient. This helps the reader who may have heard that a probe reached Mars realize that there were actually two of them and find the right now. --MASEM (t) 20:26, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 23

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health

International relations
Video Games

US conducts air strikes against ISIL targets in Syria

Article: 
ISIL targets in Syria (Post)
News source(s): CNN

Credits:

 Count Iblis (talk) 01:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Except the "pisswatter" argument being made is that Syria is no longer effectively sovereign over that territory. It would be rather like violence in Israel spilling over into the West Bank; would you be here arguing for a new blurb because it's now in a new country? GoldenRing (talk) 04:12, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If Iran and Saudi Arabia were on the same side as Israel, you don't think that would be ITN? Abductive (reasoning) 04:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well yes, except it's already there, in ongoing... GoldenRing (talk) 04:44, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, turns out "Bombing a sovereign nation (Syria) without permission" is a pisswater erroneous statement. You don't get "permission" to bomb a country. What the US did do was inform Syria that this was going to take place. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One certainly can get permission. The US is bombing Yemen and Iraq with permission. Abductive (reasoning) 17:50, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Quite so. And my apology for the error. However, it is true to say that the US told Syria, and Syria didn't say no. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – This is a major milestone in the US attacks against ISIL because it's now picking a whole new country to bomb; the event needs an article, though. – Epicgenius (talk) 02:39, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Yes, it's in ongoing, but this is a major development. The media are treating it as an attack on a new country, even if it's still within ISIS-controlled territory. IRW0 (talk) 13:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – major milestone.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - just another turn in the conflict, adequately covered by ongoing Legaleagle86 (talk) 23:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support — This, along with the UN resolution, is the No. 1 story in the world today. Sca (talk) 23:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly. Apparently it's fine to leave number one stories in "Ongoing" just because they are ongoing, without any further explanation of what exactly is in the news. Furthermore,
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant#September 2014 the appropriate section. starship.paint ~ regal 00:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
I agree. If we didn't have "Ongoing", we'd probably have had a couple informative blurbs over the past couple weeks regarding the Iraq/Syria situation. I'm not against "Ongoing" itself, but it shouldn't be used to suppress useful blurbs simply because a topic already has a vague link. IRW0 (talk) 12:20, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Jadavpur University protests

Article: 2014 Jadavpur University protests (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: 2014 Jadavpur University protests is an ongoing series of protests by the students of Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India (Post)
News source(s): 1, 2, 3, 4
Credits:

Nominator's comments: IPs are making some trouble. I have added few tags, inclduing the "citation needed" recently. We can fix those. --TitoDutta 00:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question: What makes these protests unusual, newsworthy, interesting, or otherwise standout as something other than garden-variety university protests? Your proposed blurb basically says that the protests exists. It doesn't tell us why we should care. Why should we? Before I can decide to support or oppose this, help me understand why these protests stand out as particularly worthy of note?--Jayron32 00:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually a news article reports, many international universities are going to hold protests. --TitoDutta 01:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What started as a garden variety student protest grew to a citi-wide, then state-wide proportion, with significant nation-wide interest. This university is one of the premiere universities in the country, and, like any other universities in the world, has had its share of student agitations in the past. However, direct administration of the police and commando forces by the state government, political ramifications in the state level, moral support from students of other universities/institutes, spontaneous support from the urban citizens of India have set it apart. Also, this is likely to be the first major student protest in India that is using social media at the level the world has witnessed in other countries (Egypt, for example) in recent years. --Dwaipayan (talk) 01:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can pretty much vouch for Dwaipayan's last statement. As a student of Jadavpur University and being a part of the movement, I have seen for myself how far social media has taken this. There has been, in fact, 'unofficial' state response on social media. I hope to introduce the entire subsection with pictures on this point. The students' wing of the state government has held a counter-demonstration, all of which will be updated. The movement is also very likely to be the largest collective student movement independent India has seen in terms of sheer number. I apologize in advance for any stylistic errors I have made. I'm very new here and intended only to represent the protest wiki page impartially as far as possible. The introductory paragraphs I reworked with citations. If I may propose a Blurb: International solidarity with the 2014 Jadavpur University protests sees protest demonstration planned in New York.--Arkaprabha (talk) 08:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment the neutrality tag needs to be addressed before this nomination can be considered. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If I can rework most or all of it today, can we nominate this again tomorrow? (I'm very new here. Don't know how this works)--Arkaprabha (talk) 08:36, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine, no need to renominate, but we are generally advised against posting anything with an orange or red maintenance tag, so that will need to be fixed, whenever you can. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment What specific event is being nominated here? The police attack on September 17, the scheduled global protests for September 27, or is this a nomination for "Ongoing" for the entire thing? Whether or not the police attack was notable, it's too old to post now. We don't generally post things like scheduled protests, and I see minimal coverage of these planned global protests in Indian media (and none in other worldwide media.) IRW0 (talk) 14:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose personally I support these protests, but if you look at the other ITN items this seems to be an insignificant one. If we compare this with the 2013 Shahbag protests which was successfully nominated for ITN, we would find that there is little wider ramification and almost no recognition outside India (apart from BBC and mailonline) for the Jadavpur protests. Legaleagle86 (talk) 17:53, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Just not a significant protest. Rhodesisland (talk) 03:15, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 22

Business and economy
Politics and elections
Science and technology

September 21

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health
  • Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa

Politics and elections

Religion

Sport
  • In tennis, two-time Australian Open champion Victoria Azarenka is to miss the remainder of the season because of the foot injury that has blighted her year. (BBC)

[Posted] MAVEN probe

Proposed image
Article: MAVEN (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The NASA probe MAVEN enters orbit of Mars to study its atmospheric loss. (Post)
News source(s): NBC News ABC News (US) BBC The Guardian Sydney Morning Herald
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Space probes reaching their destination are ITNR. An Indian Mars probe (the Mars Orbiter Mission) will arrive on Tuesday; perhaps a combined blurb? I welcome advice on the blurb. --331dot (talk) 09:18, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

@
ITNR list it has already been judged notable enough for posting; we are now just judging article quality and deciding on a blurb. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

People's Climate March

Article: People's Climate March (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Over 300,000 people take part in the People's Climate March in New York City. (Post)
News source(s): NY Times NBC News
Credits:

 --Johnsemlak (talk) 23:04, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sounds like OR to me. It's on the top of the news here, probably because it wasn't expected to do so well. Also, marches held in many cites across the world, not just NYC. Abductive (reasoning) 01:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • One note on the number--I would like to see an independent estimate on the crowd size in NY. The estimate of 300,000+ is by the organizers. The major media sources have quoted that figure but not made their own estimate..--Johnsemlak (talk) 01:46, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment As this appears to have been something that occurred in several worldwide locations, if we could get an accurate (within Medeis' concern above) count and a city number, a better blurb would be "Over x00,000 people in y cities participate in the People's Climate March". --MASEM (t) 01:50, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Protests happened in several cities but the main one was in NY which is aimed at a UN summit on climate change .--Johnsemlak (talk) 01:56, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Maybe that the march was in advance of the summit might help the blurb (to give more relevance in the ITN box) eg, staying with your current language "Over 300,000 people take part in the People's Climate March in advance of the UN Climate Summit in New York City." --MASEM (t) 02:00, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose- We should post only the summit, not these meaningless preliminary protests. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 03:35, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Major event, worldwide coverage in the news. Article looks ok. Opposes fail to make the case that this is not a valid ITN blurb. Jusdafax 04:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support if the blurb is globalized as the event was not limited to New York. Starting to get coverage in MSM. Not sure where the crowd estimates are from but we should try to lock that down too. 331dot (talk) 09:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Bzweebl. Protests, marches and demonstrations around the world take place every day, but we usually post only those who end up in civil disorder, political response and significant international reactions. Unfortunately, this has nothing to do with it and seems to be notable only for the record, although the number of participants in the march also seems to be heavily inflated. The article is in very good shape, though.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Simply not major news. I think this showed up once in my news feed this morning. Opposes fail to make the case that this is not a valid ITN blurb - please try to raise the level of debate above, Yes it is! Not it isn't!. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldenRing (talkcontribs) 00:50, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Not a significant protest. Should we close it or just let it slide off? Rhodesisland (talk) 03:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 FIVB Volleyball Men's World Championship

Article: 2014 FIVB Volleyball Men's World Championship (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The 2014 FIVB Volleyball Men's World Championship concludes with Poland defeating Brazil in the final. (Post)
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah

Articles: Ashraf Ghani (talk · history · tag) and Abdullah Abdullah (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah agree to become president and chief executive officer of Afghanistan, respectively. (Post)
News source(s): Businessweek
Credits:

One or both nominated events are listed on
talk to me 15:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

September 20

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime
  • Two high-visibility U.S based law firms
    Morgan Lewis & Bockius, have decided to merge, according to a Reuters report relying on confidential sources. (Reuters)
    .

Politics and elections

Sports

[Posted] New Zealand general election, 2014

Article: 
New Zealand general election. (Post)
News source(s): BBC

Credits:

Article needs updating
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 The Rambling Man (talk) 11:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment - could someone please fix the horrible grammatical error which is currently on the front page on

WP:ITN. It should say "wins" not "win", because "National Party" is singular. Adpete (talk) 04:41, 24 September 2014 (UTC) Never mind, fixed after raising it at the correct place: Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors Adpete (talk) 07:18, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

September 19

Accidents and disasters

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Attacks and armed conflicts
Health

International relations

Law and crime
  • Glaxosmithkline US$490 million for its alleged involvement in a bribery scandal. (BBC)

Politics and elections

Sports

[Posted] Alibaba IPO

Nominator's comments: Very important financial event. --King of ♠ 02:05, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Asian Games opening ceremony

Article: 2014 Asian Games opening ceremony (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The 2014 Asian Games opens in Incheon, South Korea (Post)
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Updates are a bit light, but for a new article, this could be acceptable. --–HTD 17:05, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

  • The ITNR list states that only the opening of this(and the other non-Olympic events) is posted; the closing would have to be nominated and judged on its merits. 331dot (talk) 23:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Show me the consensus and I'll agree we should propose removal from ITNR and discuss. Right now I'm not seeing any consensus on anything related to this nomination, especially since you were the only one who opposed. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 03:39, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here. HiLo48 (talk) 03:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Ok, stricken. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 03:46, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Removed] Remove from Ongoing:
Ukraine Conflict

In terms on new encyclopedic news, this is in a bit of a lull. The ceasefire seems to pretty much be sticking and although there are outbreaks of incidents, they haven't been of individually significant to be full news stories in themselves. Latest events are here

War_in_Donbass#September_ceasefire. I'd like to start a place for people's opinions on when this would drop below the criteria for staying on as Ongoing. For reference, the Gaza conflict ceasefire took place on the 26th August, and we pulled it from ongoing on the 28th [20]. CaptRik (talk) 21:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

September 18

Armed conflicts and attacks
International relations
Health
Law and crime
Politics and elections
Science
Sports

Ebola

Article: No article specified
Blurb: ​ The
Ebola virus a "threat to international peace and security" in its first-ever resolution regarding a public health crisis.
News source(s): BBC

Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Move from Ongoing to blurb considering the gravity of the situation. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The BBC page states that it was the UN Security Council, not the WHO. 331dot (talk) 20:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Wow, where did I get that from? Updated. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:38, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Understandable; the WHO is mentioned in that article. 331dot (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment If this is blurbed, this should not remove the ongoing, since this is only a critical midpoint and the ebola story will still be going strong. --MASEM (t) 20:42, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok, no big deal. We could always place it back onto Ongoing once the blurb got stale. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:49, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is there a link for some solid numbers? I have just recently read that this might go into six figures, but some bureaucratic body pontificating makes me want to ask how many divisions the pope has. μηδείς (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose there's already a sticky on the epidemic. The UN's $0.02 on the subject doesn't really change the facts of the epidemic. Didn't the UN warn us that the polar ice cap would be gone by now anyway. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 21:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. The UN expressing an opinion does not create a material change in the situation. Resolute 23:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Oppose It's a major story but I worry about it yo-yo'ing between full blurb and Ongoing if major announcements are made about it. As it stands, a full blurb would drop back off again in 7 days or so. There's absolutely no doubt that it should be on the main page, but as it stands I believe we've not even reached the peak of the outbreak. CaptRik (talk) 18:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support with added altblurb. Per the BBC ref: "Never before has the United Nations Security Council met to confront a public health crisis". From a Science article [21]: "the resolution had 130 co-sponsors, more than any previous one in the history of the Security Council." IRW0 (talk) 22:20, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Will the UN's statement have any lasting significance? No. -- Ypnypn (talk) 02:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Closed] Royal & Ancient allow women

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: The Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Members of The Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St Andrews vote to allow women members for the first time in its 260-year history. (Post)
News source(s): BBC CNN
Credits:

Article needs updating
Nominator's comments: Very odd, but yet curiously notable. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:26, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. It seems notable that the 'home of golf' would change its longstanding membership policy. 331dot (talk) 20:36, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The most prestigious club in the US did this in the 90's and the result, historically, was nix, nada, nichevo. It's almost as bad as 40 year old couple accept that their only child is gay. μηδείς (talk) 21:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Point taken, but Augusta National wasn't nearly as old as this club, nor was it essentially where golf arose from. 331dot (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as the home of golf. The matter (allowing women to join a golf club) isn't notably any more. It was in the 90s. But the club in this case makes it worthy of ITN. We don't post ITNs when countries legislate for same-sex marriage any more, for example. But if Afghanistan did, we'd post that. --Tóraí (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, this really is an epoch-defining event, given the timescales and global significance involved. Rule changes made by distant foreign countries don't really factor into it; this is the real thing. --
    talk) 00:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Oppose, elicited little more than a yawn when it happened, and mostly forgotten already. Nsk92 (talk) 17:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Other than exposing some elitist retardedness, not very notable.
    (Talk) 01:47, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[Closed] Archbishop of Canterbury admits he has doubts about God

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Archbishop of Canterbury (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Archbishop of Canterbury sometimes has doubts in his belief in God. (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:
 Count Iblis (talk) 20:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose posting the mere statement; if there are repercussions from it (such as attempts to remove him from his position) that might merit posting. 331dot (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose if we didn't post the fact that the Pope suggested that there was a significant percentage of child sex abusers in the Catholic Church, why post this? I imagine most, if not all people of faith have occasional doubts. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:51, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose unless and until we get an official statement to confirm that God has doubts about the existence of the Archbishop of Canterbury.
    BencherliteTalk 21:07, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[Posted] Hour record

Proposed image
Articles: 
Nergaal (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

This is similar to marathon times: unless you have some standardization, you can not exclude i.e wind from having enhanced Indurain's performance. This record is done under very well standardized conditions. Some people from the past might have beaten this distance with current equipment, but we are talking here about an officially sanctioned performance.
Nergaal (talk) 21:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Could you point to me the where it states it has to be high on the BBC website before it's included on WP's frontpage? I'm guessing if Bradley Wiggins had a pop at this, it'll be frontpage on the BBC and WP. The "cycling aficionados" comment adds more weight for it to be posted IMO. A non-American in a sport not that well covered getting some good quality article updates. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:24, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Article is in pretty good shape (not perfect, there's maybe 1-2 more cites needed), but really a solid article, and the information is certainly current. I see no harm in showing the world a good Wikipedia article. It's certainly better than 90% of the stuff we put up in ITN merely because something is happening now. It would be nice to post something which is meant to showcase quality work for a change. --Jayron32 14:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Jens Voigt just set a very important cycling record, eclipsing a long standing mark. See also Hour record. This is a big deal! He did it on a closed track. 7&6=thirteen () 22:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment A pic of the record has been added to the article, so I replaced it here too. We now have a pic of the record in progress.
    (Talk) 23:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Comment Here's some sources from around the world. This is a very big deal.
I saw the source on the kw output, but I haven't found it again. 7&6=thirteen () 23:57, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What happens now? How long before it's posted? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Need an independent admin to pop by and post it. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sod it, posted. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nice one, Rambles. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Closed] 25 years of the Peaceful Revolution

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Articles: Peaceful Revolution (talk · history · tag) and Joachim Gauck (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ German president Gauck welcomes state officials to Mecklenburg to celebrate 25 years of the Peaceful Revolution (pictured). (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ German president Gauck welcomes state officials to Mecklenburg to adress demographic change in Europe and commemorate 25 years of the Peaceful Revolution (pictured).
News source(s): [2]
Credits:
Nominator's comments: For all I can see we didn't have an ITN piece on the anniversary of the most important event in late 20th century history. I think we should, especially in these times of more upcoming war and despair it's important to remember how things can be carried out peacefully. ---- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The demographic aspect is important and wasn't featured on ITN either, but the alternative blurb could be a bit long for the box, so we might stick with the shorter blurb. Cheers, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
'speedy close' if anything this is for OTDLihaas (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[Posted] Scottish independence referendum

Proposed image
Article: 
votes against
independence from the United Kingdom.
Credits:

Nominator's comments: I know this will almost certainly be posted after the result but this maybe one of few votes where readers would want some background and will be interested in it as it happens. Bump nomination to 18th sept afterwards please. ---- Ashish-g55 23:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC) [relocated under correct date as per nominator's request - Justin Urquhart Stewart (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2014 (UTC)][reply]

  • I think this is only notable if the Yes vote passes, otherwise it's just another domestic vote. DHN (talk) 23:59, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support only if yes wins. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 00:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose posting the fact of the referendum, I don't see what point it would serve, ITN is not some kind of reminder service. It'd be an obvious support for the actual result (expected on the 19th) regardless of the outcome, given its huge constitutional significance, but that is not the nomination here. Justin Urquhart Stewart (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose posting before the results. Support only if it passes. Reach Out to the Truth 01:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Whilst I don't support posting this now (until we've got results), why exactly would it only be news if Scotland voted in favour of independence? It would be just as newsworthy if Scotland decided to stay in union, given the close nature of the race. RGloucester 01:12, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is there to report if they vote no? Scotland almost declares independence but doesn't? And anyway, from a statistical perspective, the outcome of the race has been close, but has never been in statistical doubt. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 01:26, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This has been a slow burning issue for at least the last twenty years: whatever the outcome the matter is put to bed for a generation. It is not as if in the event of a no vote Salmond (or anyone else in the SNP) will be allowed to try again in five years - Britain has a general aversion to referenda compared to many other countries and you certainly can't simply re-poll until you get the "right" answer. Justin Urquhart Stewart (talk) 01:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Times are a -chanin...got an EU referendum due soon. And some precedence in Quecec for a nother vote within a generation (depends how its defined)Lihaas (talk) 08:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In the context of ITN, this is one of the few referendums where the outcome doesn't really matter, imnsho. The vote itself is a historic and defining moment in the history of Scotland and Great Britain, much in the way the
1995 Quebec referendum was for the province and Canada as a whole. We should post the result either way. Resolute 19:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
DAMN! took my nom ;( 'support regardless with result' to be declared in under 24 hours. Its got ramification and is certainly in the news.
ALBA GO BRAIG!!!! Let freedom reign!!!!!!Lihaas (talk) 08:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. We need to be careful over precise terminology, given that the question asked is simply "Should Scotland be an independent country?" We should not try to interpret the result in an over-specific way. Words like "secession", and even "United Kingdom", are not on the ballot paper and are best avoided - for example, we simply do not know if the remaining parts of the UK will still be called the "United Kingdom" or not. There is uncertainty and scope for interpretation over precisely what happens next. Hence, Altblurb2 - In a
    referendum, Scotland votes for/against becoming an independent country. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:36, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
yes to "Should Scotland be an independent country" by definition means secession.Lihaas (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ye, should move the issues to a separate section as per the endorsementsLihaas (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Umh, not sure what u r taking about TRM. In this particular case the story itself seems unusually well covered even outside UK so I don't understand why can't this be posted before the results are out.
Nergaal (talk) 21:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Support once results are known. It Is Me Here t / c 16:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support when the tally is complete, regardless of the outcome. In a discussion on the main ITN talk page, I opposed posting this before the vote took place. Given all of the news coverage I've seen leading up to the vote in this past week, I'm certain this should be posted even if the "status quo" wins. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - It would be nice to get something up to say that votes are being counted (in a few hours time), and then update it to give the result at about 07:00 UTC. Franklin's ship can certainly be moved out of ITN. Jamesx12345 17:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Per Modest Genius. Miyagawa (talk) 19:25, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support posting the result, whatever way it goes. Historic event for UK and Scotland. Mjroots (talk) 19:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support posting the result. Defining moment in Scotland and the UK's history, no matter how it turns out. Resolute 19:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support when results are known to us. GoodDay (talk) 21:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - when results are becoming clear.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:41, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support posting result when article is updated. Posting the fact of the referendum today would have been reasonable, but it's a moot point now. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The vote alone is major world news. Let's get this on the Main Page! ----Another Believer (Talk) 01:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • The official results will be in soon enough. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a news wire. Abductive (reasoning) 02:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted The result just in pushes the question over the line. Scotland has voted No. --Tóraí (talk) 05:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's all over but the pouting. Sca (talk) 15:07, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's all over, bar the trouting. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:24, 19 September 2014 (UTC) [reply]
  • Suggest Update (Proposed as altblurb) to reflect the fact that Salmond has resigned. We don't often mention second-level leaders, but it fits well into the blurb (i.e., his resignation is not the whole story) and the circumstances of his resignation are, well, somewhat exceptional. Smurrayinchester 15:33, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I"d oppose that--we don't need to include details of the SNP politics in the blurb. Support blurb as is.--Johnsemlak (talk) 15:44, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 17

Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Politics and elections
Sport

[Posted] Fijian general election, 2014

Proposed image
Article: 
Fijian general election
, the first Fijian election in eight years.
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: If the Swedish election gets ITN so should the Fijian one. Also it is on ITN/R. ~~ NickGibson3900 Talk 06:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

NO prose update. Also updated te blurb to combine the alt with theunifhnished one...and added the coup partLihaas (talk) 11:50, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose article needs to be updated, there's no excuse, plus the lead is pathetically short and contravenes
    WP:LEAD. Look forward to seeing the supporters get involved with improvements if they have time. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:56, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
@The Rambling Man and Lihaas: I understand your concerns. TRM; I have expanded the lead and the info box. Official results are currently been announced as I type (06:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC)). I think it will be updated in the next 12-24 hours. Also - both your help would be appreciated if you have any spare time. -- NickGibson3900 Talk 06:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Counting is still ongoing and we should definitely get the final results (in relation to seats) in the next 5 hours even though some of the preliminary results may be out within the next hour..--Stemoc 09:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Obviously more significant (even) than "routine" general elections in most countries: official restoration of democracy after eight years of military rule. And it seems to me the article has been adequately updated. Aridd (talk) 19:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment should the result not be summarised in the lead of the article? The Rambling Man (talk) 08:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: Done. NickGibson3900 Talk 08:35, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per
    WP:ITN/R, but can you suggest an alternative blurb? Yogwi21talk 09:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
@Yogwi21: Suggested alt blurb -- NickGibson3900 Talk 09:28, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: This is ready to go - NickGibson3900 Talk 02:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 17

Armed conflicts and attacks
Arts and culture
Disasters and accidents
International relations
Politics and elections
Sport

[Posted] Fijian general election, 2014

Proposed image
Article: 
Fijian general election
, the first Fijian election in eight years.
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: If the Swedish election gets ITN so should the Fijian one. Also it is on ITN/R. ~~ NickGibson3900 Talk 06:46, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

NO prose update. Also updated te blurb to combine the alt with theunifhnished one...and added the coup partLihaas (talk) 11:50, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose article needs to be updated, there's no excuse, plus the lead is pathetically short and contravenes
    WP:LEAD. Look forward to seeing the supporters get involved with improvements if they have time. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:56, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
@The Rambling Man and Lihaas: I understand your concerns. TRM; I have expanded the lead and the info box. Official results are currently been announced as I type (06:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC)). I think it will be updated in the next 12-24 hours. Also - both your help would be appreciated if you have any spare time. -- NickGibson3900 Talk 06:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Counting is still ongoing and we should definitely get the final results (in relation to seats) in the next 5 hours even though some of the preliminary results may be out within the next hour..--Stemoc 09:28, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Obviously more significant (even) than "routine" general elections in most countries: official restoration of democracy after eight years of military rule. And it seems to me the article has been adequately updated. Aridd (talk) 19:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment should the result not be summarised in the lead of the article? The Rambling Man (talk) 08:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: Done. NickGibson3900 Talk 08:35, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per
    WP:ITN/R, but can you suggest an alternative blurb? Yogwi21talk 09:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
@Yogwi21: Suggested alt blurb -- NickGibson3900 Talk 09:28, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: This is ready to go - NickGibson3900 Talk 02:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 16

Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health
International relations
Law and crime

Typhoon Kalmaegi (2014)

Article: 
the Philippines. (Post)
News source(s): Weather Channel

Credits:

 --

talk to me 14:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

September 15

Armed conflicts and attacks
Business and economics
Disasters and accidents
Politics and elections

Libya migrant shipwreck

Article: 2014 Libya migrant shipwreck (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ More than 200 migrants are believed to have drowned in a sinking off the coast of Libya. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ About 500 migrants drown in a shipwreck off Maltese coast and another 200 off Libyan coast.
News source(s): Daily Telegraph
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Once expanded, could be combined with news from 2014 Malta migrant shipwreckThe Rambling Man (talk) 14:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Conditional support alblurb Once the Libyan number is confirmed and both articles become fleshy. The total number (about 700) is dramatic. Brandmeistertalk 17:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Engvar these seem to have been one way illegal immigrants carried by human traffickers. Why would the blurb call them migrants if they are not seasonal/annual travellers with papers? Cannot we just call them Libyans who were drowned by human traffickers? μηδείς (talk) 21:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See the BBC article linked in my post below - I think this is an engvar issue where anyone migrating legally or illegally are referred to as migrants. CaptRik (talk) 22:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That the term is used in the British press, but not the American is precisely the issue. In the US there are legal migrant farm workers who work the season then go home. There are migrat birds that summer in one range and winter in another. We take huge pains to be Engvar neutral in sports results. I think it would make sense to say something likeX-hundred Africans/Libyans drown when human trafficker ram their vessel. μηδείς (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
'Migrant' means someone who is migrating from one place to another. It applies regardless of how long for, whether legally or illegally, how far apart those places are etc. This meaning appears in every AmE dictionary I checked [22]. I can't see how it presents ENGVAR problems. Modest Genius talk 12:27, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There's a thing called proper usage. According you, my sister and her family were migrants when the drove across a few states to visit their cousin for his first birthday? These may be refugees or undocumented workers but they are not seasonal travellers. Likewise, they weren't euthanized by pleasure-boaters. μηδείς (talk) 19:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Did they go there in order to seek work? I doubt the infant was offering employment ;) Having said that, if there is a more neutral/inclusive way to put it, we should strive for mutual comprehension. Modest Genius talk 22:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Migrant" is the correct term and is uncoloured by politics at least in an encyclopedic sense. "Immigrant" or "emigrant" are matters of perspective best avoided but ultimately we have to assume that readers of the English language Wikipedia can at least speak English. MonumentallyIncompetent (talk) 04:40, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support the new ~200 death sinking, but according to [23] the 500+ one was last week and so might be ineligible? (despite being a tragedy that's only really coming to light now). CaptRik (talk) 22:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It seems as though the 500 death sinking occurred on the 10th [24] and so should be moved under that date, although as noted above it took some time for this to come to light.
talk to me 22:59, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
óppose'' far too frequent...at this rate we shoul post the Iraq/Syria/Libya /Pakistan bombingsLihaas (talk) 16:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If I understand your post, we do post Iraq etc in Ongoing when the going gets hot. Sinkings like this are nowhere near as common as bombings in the Middle East, as well you know. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:51, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • the article is a mere stub. CNN is reporting that the ship was deliberately rammed by the Palestinian smugglers and most aboard were Palestinians who used their rebuilding money to pay some official agency to be smuggled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.185.242.18 (talk) 01:34, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - significant number of deaths.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:59, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I would only support if the articles were expanded, but it's been a few days now and nothing has happened. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Closed] Microsoft acquires Mojang

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
Mojang for $2.5 billion. (Post)
News source(s): BBC, WSJ

Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: While I fully recognize this is otherwise a small business deal in the scope of things, this is a rather huge thing in the world of video games, given the popularity and success of Minecraft. --MASEM (t) 13:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose regrettably. I've been paying attention to this story rather closely, but this is a small category of business news. Company acquisitions of small publishers and developrs are rather frequent, especially in the gaming world.--WaltCip (talk) 14:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support while I accept it's not the largest business news in the world, it is of interest to a large portion of our readers. I think waiting for the massive business news items now means we are unlikely to post any. The Rambling Man (talk) 14:39, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per WaltCip. Admittedly of a large interest to readers but it's too small and frequent of a story. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 14:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • In terms of the video game industry, $2B is huge, and this is a rarity in that scale. Yes, in all of business, drop in the bucket, but not in this industry. --MASEM (t) 15:18, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I believe that this is big news. While Mojang is a small company and may only have one big game (Minecraft), that game has sold "nearly 54 million copies across all platforms" and is a big gain for Microsoft Palmtree5551 (talk) 15:13, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Had that been Mojo, however. μηδείς (talk) 21:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question: did we post Microsoft's acquisition of Nokia? Because that was a much bigger deal (both literally and figuratively). Modest Genius talk 21:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It was discussed here - [25] and looks like it went stale without being posted. CaptRik (talk) 22:08, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, minor, minor deal. No impact on the players of minecraft. Abductive (reasoning) 23:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Says who? Do you have proof that this won't have any effect on Minecraft players? Palmtree5551 (talk) 00:07, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The deal may be huge in the particular industry that Mojang is involved in, but no doubt that could be said about plenty of business deals of this size. I don't see why the video games industry should get preferential treatment over other industries. Neljack (talk) 23:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Arguably, it is almost impossible for video game news to make ITN, because some see it as too far niche despite numerous coming on part with other entertainment mediums for specific works. No, I'm not saying that we need to flood ITN with video game coverage, but it is a major development in that specific field, and since we generally try to consider stories relative to the field they are in, this would be a reason to consider inclusion. --MASEM (t) 01:02, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • I'd rather see those video game championships posted than business deals. Abductive (reasoning) 01:18, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 14

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Sport

[Closed] Matthew Todd Miller

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Matthew Todd Miller (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Matthew Todd Miller is sentenced to six years of hard labor by a North Korean court. (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:
Nominator's comments: Miller was convicted on charges of espionage. This seems to be a significant story since Miller and 2 other Americans have appealed to the US government to send a "senior statesman" to Pyongyang. [26] --
talk to me 00:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[Posted] 2014 FIBA Basketball World Cup Final

Article: 
final (Post)
News source(s): ESPN, BBC

Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Updated and in ITNR. Good to go. –HTD 00:54, 15 September 2014 (UTC) --–HTD 00:54, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

  • Support - ITN/R , and the article is updating and in good shape. --MASEM (t) 01:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ITN/R—Bagumba (talk) 07:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mild support looks okay, but a heavy dependency on primary sources (FIBA) and an inconsistent approach to diacritics. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:29, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm a bit sceptical about this nomination as the quality of this tournament is far lower than the Olympic tournament. Many players from the European national teams usually prefer to play at the Olympics or the EuroBasket instead of the FIBA World Cup. For example, Tony Parker refused to play for France three times, while he regularly plays at the Olympics and the EuroBasket. The United States national team are also typically not represented by their top players. Evidently, even the media do not pay serious attention on it: its coverage here in Europe is definitely less than the EuroBasket, while in the United States it's not even on the level of the pre-seasonal NBA news. Another major issue is that even the FIBA officials are afraid about the popularity of this tournament and they decided to abandon organising it in the same year with the FIFA World Cup and thereby scheduled the next one to take place in 2019. I know that much of my concern will have to be addressed
    elsewhere and so I decided to leave this just as a comment.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Posting. Well, it only takes place every 4 years and it's ITNR, so I guess we should keep it. I understand the concerns, otherwise. --Tone 13:54, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto International Film Festival

Article: 2014 Toronto International Film Festival (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: The Imitation Game wins the People's Choice Award at the 2014 Toronto International Film Festival. (Post)
News source(s): USA Today, WSJ
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 --JuneGloom Talk 17:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

  • Weak Support - I know the article format is the same as previous years but it feels a bit thin, I'd like to point out to other commentors if we should expect more or is otherwise fine. I don't think it needs more based on this but otherwise seems good to go. --MASEM (t) 20:07, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Posted] Swedish general election, 2014

Article: 
Swedish general election.
News source(s): [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]

Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Please feel free to change the blurb or add new ones, I think this election is noteworthy. --BabbaQ (talk) 12:25, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Is it possible to replace the image of Oscar Pistorius by this image of
Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 13:59, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Done. —
David Levy 17:42, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

September 13

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents
  • At least 29 people are missing after the ferry MV Maharlika II sinks off the Philippines coast. (CNN)

Health
  • 2014 Taiwan food scandal
    :
    • Yeh Wen-hsiang, the chairman of Chang Guann Co, is arrested for fraud for his role in the scandal. (AFP via SBA)

International relations

Sports

[Closed] Floyd Mayweather vs. Marcos Maidana

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nominator's comments: I think boxing should be covered on ITN, especially one of the greats such as Floyd Mayweather, Jr. Andise1 (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Boxing should be covered in ITN. Just not this fight. Right now, the only prospective fight with any juju would be the putative Mayweather-Pacquiao fight; but barring that one I can't imagine this fight (or nearly any other excepting perhaps a major heavyweight title unification fight) having enough importance to the sporting world to merit inclusion in ITN given the deplorable state of boxing right now. Even respectable boxing press derided this fight as Mayweather beating up an inferior opponent; it's another tomato can for Mayweather to take on while he and Pacquiao avoid each other even more. "Less than engaging", for just one example... --Jayron32 05:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the love of god no Such an event should never be covered at ITN. It is not a sporting event of worldwide significance such as the Olympics or the Tennis Opens or the World Cup. Valiant Patriot (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Per above, "Please do not... ... complain about an event only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive." Andise1 (talk) 05:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Per my objection, Floyd Mayweather winning his boxing match isn't news anywhere. This story is not news. Not news, ok? I'm not seeing it on BBC.Com NYT.com or News.com.au. This story is not news. Not news at all. Please don't assume people are so stupid they haven't read the guidelines at the top of the page. Valiant Patriot (talk) 05:40, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The only sporting events we should cover at ITN are the olympics, Tennis Opens, World cups and so on. Items of actual significance only please. Valiant Patriot (talk) 05:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
BBC.com, New York Times, news.com.au. Seriously, if you're going to raise objections, you could at least do so from a place other than self-righteous "I'm so much better than all you people because I'm protecting the world from what I think are unimportant stories" bullshit. --Jayron32 05:45, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Jayron. I respect your oppose as you agree with me that Boxing should be covered on ITN. This match has been covered quite a bit, so to use the argument that it's not news is ridiculous. Andise1 (talk) 05:53, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I thought ITN was were we voiced our opinions on news articles, not where Jayron32 accused other people of spouting 'bullshit' and attacking those he disagrees with. How terribly 'self-righteous' of him. I was referring to the frontpages of those sites, clearly this 'bullshit' story is not warranting front page coverage anywhere in the world. Frankly, the fact that you so quickly jump to accusations, attacks and swear words demonstrates a severe lack of character. Thankyou and goodbye Valiant Patriot (talk) 06:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jayron is obviously having a bad day, but, to quote him, "he does need to modify how he interacts with people". Pot, kettle etc. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:15, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 12

Armed conflicts and attacks

Health

International relations
  • Australia raises its terror threat level to high following concerns about militants returning from conflicts in Iraq and Syria. (BBC)

Law and crime

Politics

Science

Sport

[Posted] RD: Ian Paisley

Article: Ian Paisley (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD
.
I have fixed all of them.
talk to me 22:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
There are 2 sentences for an update...meanwhile when you deem something not worthy despite consensus and a bigger update that is not fai r enough for ITN. Lord dictators of ITN...11:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)Lihaas (talk)
Give it a rest. There was clear consensus in favour of it being posted, it was updated, albeit briefly, and had the many [citation needed] tags resolved by people who actually work to improve things around here. Get it? The Rambling Man (talk) 11:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Posted] Oscar Pistorius convicted

Article: Trial of Oscar Pistorius (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ South African athlete Oscar Pistorius is found guilty of culpable homicide of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ South African athlete Oscar Pistorius is found not guilty of murder but guilty of culpable homicide of his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp.
News source(s): BBC Le Monde CNN Times of India News 24 (South Africa)
Credits:
  • Thought I'd stump this one up for nomination as the verdict is (likely) to be today. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:13, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strongest Possible Opposse There is absolutely nothing newsworthy about the murder trial of an olympic athlete in South Africa. While ITN does in part reflect the news media, there is no actual encyclopedic value to the story. Valiant Patriot (talk) 08:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
....which is why it is the top headline story around the world, appearing on the top of most news sites, in some cases in large print(including France, the UK, India)- because it isn't newsworthy. This is something people will be interested in learning about, which is what ITN is about. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support original blurbwhen the article has been updated altblurb is too long for itn and not necessary. HelenOnline 08:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. This is the top story around the world at the moment. Very rarely does one see one story get such attention in a wide variety of countries. Now that he has been convicted we don't have the lack of a conviction as an argument against. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support – I came here to nominate this but it already had been NickGibson3900 Talk 09:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Surely to be fair the blurb should also include his acquittal on the murder count - the most serious charge he faced. I've proposed an altblurb to this effect. We have to be scrupulously careful to be fair when it comes to a living person. Neljack (talk) 09:21, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support alt blurb. I agree. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Two bold links to the same article? Nein danke. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:30, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fair point - I have no problem with taking one of them out. Neljack (talk) 09:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've amended it to incorporate them into one linked to the article. I don't think we really need to wikilink murder - unlike culpable homicide, it is a generally understood term. Neljack (talk) 09:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support original blurb The altblurb looks excessively moot to me, the wikilink to culpable homicide sorts this out. Brandmeistertalk 09:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. I prefer the original blurb, but I don't object to the alt. Clearly the top story around the world at the moment. Thryduulf (talk) 10:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral, but use original blurb if posted (as seems likely). The story here is the crime he has been found guilty of committing, not the ones he didn't do. I'm a little uncomfortable about posting a sensational story like this, but it is certainly in the news and our article is extensive so I won't oppose. Modest Genius talk 11:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support and my preference is for the original blurb as I don't feel we're being biased by not mentioning the not-guilty. Ultimately this verdict was one of the possible outcomes so it's not news that others weren't chosen. CaptRik (talk) 12:14, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted original blurb. It Is Me Here t / c 12:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Got a pic idea. I'm terrible at doing these right, but can we get a crop on
    David Levy: don't you usually do these? --Jayron32 14:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • I have uploaded a cropped version for someone more powerful than me to add to the main page. HelenOnline 14:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Picture updated, thanks HelenOnline. Thryduulf (talk) 16:07, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • Why was this picture uploaded to the front page without any discussion or consensus? Valiant Patriot (talk) 02:23, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        • The old picture was up for more than a week. Why wouldn't we replace it? And there was some discussion directly above, but that's a bonus; these picture swaps are usually uncontroversial enough to be done without prior discussion, as long as the updater knows what they are doing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
          • I'll start a discussion about pictures generally at
            WT:ITN. Thryduulf (talk) 08:24, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
            ]
Per the FAR more notably ICC/ICJ trials we post the senencing not the conviction.
Make up your mind ITN, for consistencyLihaas (talk) 11:56, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What are you talking about? We judge consensus. There is no such entity as "ITN" which "makes up its mind". You aren't making any sense at all. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:58, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nigeria church collapse

Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Blurb: No blurb specified (Post)
News source(s): [32]
Mossad did it no doubt..v.Lihaas (talk) 12:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment why are you nominating an article which you have just put up at
    WP:AFD? Are you being deliberately disruptive? The Rambling Man (talk) 12:07, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]

September 11

Armed conflicts and attacks
Law and crime

[Closed] RD: Richard Kiel

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Richard Kiel (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): http://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/movies/richard-kiel-actor-who-played-james-bond-villain-jaws-dies-n200621
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD
.
  • Oppose Not an actor at the top of the field (well known if you know Bond films, but outside of that...). Not unusual death. --MASEM (t) 02:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not a significant actor. He played a significant sidekick for a villain in a couple of films. Not enough.--Johnsemlak (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose He was at the top of his field as a fictional metal-toothed assassin saved by the love of a girl with pigtails, so I'd support if that is the field we are talking about, but as an actor unfortunately not. Belle (talk) 07:37, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. I must agree with the others; while notable for a couple roles(Bond films and Happy Gilmore) he is not very important to the field of acting. 331dot (talk) 09:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support this closure was premature, nominated at bedtime and closed before dawn in the US. The figure was iconic, and reader interest high. No one said subtleness of roles was a requirement for RD, which has plenty of space.
    • We don't use "iconic" as an RD metric; it's "top of the field", and by all measures, Kiel was not close at all due to his limited role. Iconic but not important. --MASEM (t) 17:56, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • 346,000 Views Today Kiel was certainly top of his field in "monstrous" character acters (forgive me for not finding a more PC way to say that). Again, closing this, overnight, with four opposes in about 6 hours while America was asleep is not seemly, and although I will be happy to support a no vote if tha's consensus, I am not happy to do so under current circumstances. A look at his huge TV and Filmography shows a legitimate reason for leaving this open a full 24 hours--otherwise users not familiar with the process will think a closure is like an ArbCom decision. Are we seriously afraid someoneone besides Joan Rivers will make it to RD? μηδείς (talk) 20:23, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Played one iconic role, and a bit role in Happy Gilmore. Not at the top of his field, or otherwise making a significant impact. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose only discussed because he was in two Bond movies, otherwise not significant, nowhere near top of his field, no objective evidence to the contrary. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I would suggest his over 70 TV and film appearances each with blue links (see his TV & Filmography) easily place him in the realm of Peter Lorre and Vincent Price. His physical disability seems to be the only reason he's treated as below first tier here. μηδείς (talk) 23:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • No, it's simply because none of those roles were considered top of the line for either film or movies. No nominations or awards to be listed. It has zero to do with his deformity, outside of the fact that he probably got type-casted for roles that called on it (turning that disadvantage into an advantage for himself). --MASEM (t) 02:35, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per pretty much all of the above. Regular actor who had a regular career. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:15, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[Closed] Sir Donald Sinden

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


RD: Leading British actor of stage, screen and TV.

talk) 05:56, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 10

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economic

Disasters and accidents

Sports
  • In American football, a law enforcement official tells the Associated Press that in April 2014, he sent a video of Ray Rice punching his then-fiancée in an Atlantic City casino to the NFL office. This contradicts statements made by several league officials, including commissioner Roger Goodell, claiming they had not received or seen the video before it became public on September 8. (ESPN)
  • The first
    Duchess of Cornwall. (BBC)

[Posted] Germanene

Article: 
nanomaterial that is the germanium equivalent of graphene
News source(s): phys.org, natureworldnews.com

Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: The sources say this semiconducting nanomaterial will have an array of interesting properties and lead to many technological advancements. Graphene is now a $9 billion a year industry and led to Nobels for its discoverers. --Abductive (reasoning) 02:04, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak Oppose Technically the discovery of how to synth it right is fine, but that article target is a long way from being a target from the front page, more than just a few sourcing and other tweaks. --MASEM (t) 02:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Support Article is in better shape, though I would ask if it was possible just to distill a bit more what the uses of the material could be for at a slightly higher (read : broader audience) level. But that shouldn't stop posting of this at this point. --MASEM (t) 15:03, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Perhaps the discovery of Graphene was notable, the discovery of another very similar compound is not notable. The blurb you propose evidently bases germanene's notability off the mere fact it is 'similar to graphene'. Valiant Patriot (talk) 06:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry for the weakness of my blurb. I am not basing my claim of notability on the similarity to graphene; that was just to describe germanene. As with most of my nominations to ITN/C, I just like to bring these stories to people's attention. Abductive (reasoning) 06:50, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I created the stub to expand upon. This ITN candidate discussion occurred before I could return to the article. The work was far from suitable for the front page. I have now expanded the prose a bit and added a number of new references. The finding of methods for creation of high-quality films is significant; and could follow the path of previous Nobel-quality discoveries. -Kyle(talk) 08:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Interesting discovery with good encyclopaedic value. The related materials of graphene and silicene are of major importance in the electronics industry, despite only having been discovered a few years ago. Germanium is the second-most-important semiconductor in the world, so this can be expected to have an important impact. The article is uninspiring to look at, but seems a good summary to me and is well-referenced. Modest Genius talk 11:35, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I added an alternative blurb. This could do with a little more support before posting. Modest Genius talk 11:28, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - interesting discovery.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:15, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support marked ready since we have "a little more support" and the discovery of a new allotrope of any element is interesting indeed. μηδείς (talk) 00:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted The Rambling Man (talk) 07:20, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stonehenge

Article: Stonehenge (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ A hidden complex of monuments, including 17 wooden or stone structures, is discovered near Stonehenge. (Post)
News source(s): Telegraph
Credits:

Nominator's comments: According to the source above, the survey that produced these finds was the "largest geophysical survey ever undertaken". --

talk to me 15:14, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

  • It's great but it's odd that it's all stacked into the lead, and then one sentence in the article. It's ass-about-visage. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:37, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to have been fixed; the lead now contains 1 sentence on the new research and there is a paragraph about it in the section "Archaeological research and restoration".
talk to me 00:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Comment. The target article, Stonehenge Hidden Landscapes Project, doesn't exist yet. Abductive (reasoning) 00:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    comment Stonehenge is a fine target. Creating a new article on this is fine too, but we've got a decent enough target... --Jayron32 00:57, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    I am afraid I must oppose on the grounds that the update provides little actual information, and more PR verbiage than I would care to see in an encyclopedia: "On 10 September 2014 the University of Birmingham released a video of current research being led by Vincent Gaffney that announced findings ... the four-year study is likely to provide digital information that will transform perceptions of use of the site dramatically, for both professionals and the public." Once that text is disregarded, what is left is a claim, unvetted by peer review, that there are 17 additional monuments, and that these are important somehow. Take a look at this GIS image of the new monuments. See all those other bumps, about 100 other monuments? Hmmm.... Abductive (reasoning) 01:18, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Opposse on grounds that such a discovery is hardly newsworthy. If you type 'stonehenge discovery' into google with any year of your choice post 2000 you'll find a multitude of similar 'discoveries' regarding Stonehenge. Stonehenge has been discovered to death and that circle of rocks doesn't need ITN coverage. Valiant Patriot (talk) 06:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This is a PR blurb promoting an ongoing archaeological investigation process rather than a newsworthy discovery. It's very interesting, but it's not really "news". Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:45, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • If we judge newsworthiness by what story appears on TV news the most, Ray Rice and Roger Goodell would already be on ITN.--WaltCip (talk) 19:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's not the only metric, but it is a part of it. ITN reflects what is "in the news", on TV news or otherwise. 331dot (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - significant discovery.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 9

Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters and accidents
Health
  • 2014 Taiwan food scandal
    • Products from at least 900 food makers are being recalled after authorities say a factory illegally used 243 tonnes of recycled waste oil disguised as lard, some of which may have been exported overseas. (Taipei Times) (Bloomberg)
Sports

[Closed] RD: Bob Suter

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Bob Suter (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Windorstar
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Very known in the US and should be around the world for that "Miracle on Ice" game. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 03:34, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[Closed] iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus and Apple Watch

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Articles: 
iPhone 6 Plus and Apple Watch at an event in Cupertino, California. (Post)
News source(s): CBS News

Credits:
 --
talk to me 23:34, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment By "these" do you mean all three or just the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus? Because the Apple Watch is a totally new product, not a new version of an old one.
talk to me 00:57, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Comment I'm fine with oppose votes, but
talk to me 00:57, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Is it IDONTLIKEIT or ITSAGIMMICK? Either way the point being that there is no significance to this (or any, really) product announcement - Floydian τ ¢ 01:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose and SNOW close. ITN is not a product announcement ticker. 331dot (talk) 01:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[Posted] Franklin's lost expedition

Article: Franklin's lost expedition (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper announces that one of the boats from Franklin's lost expedition has been discovered. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ One of the boats from Franklin's lost expedition, missing since 1845, is discovered off King William Island.
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

 The Rambling Man (talk) 15:02, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Conditional Support My concern as this would be considered a scientific discovery of the verification (I know the article says photographs). I'm assuming it wasn't Harper himself but it would be nice if we had some authority to whom the group/people that made the positive identification; like for any other scientific discovery we'd rather see a peer-review publication to affirm before at ITN. I don't know if we need exactly that here, but I'd rather see details of the verification process before posting. --MASEM (t) 15:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. My understanding is that Harper has been searching for this expedition as a publicity stunt. This is concerning because politicians should never be given a free pass. Anywhere. Abductive (reasoning) 15:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • This article points out that Canada as a gov't is interesting in finding these ships as it would assert sovereignty over the Northwest Passage (which due to ice cap reduction, is becoming a usable transport corridor). I can certainly sense a bit of self-importance in Haper's motives, but its hard not to argue that this would be of great interest to the overall of Canada to have control on that passage. But then, to me, this makes it more important that we have independent verification of the find. --MASEM (t) 16:40, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Honestly, placing your own POV on this story is a complete waste of time unless you're prepared to actually help with it. Alt blurb suggested. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Would we want to revise headline to say "The Canadian Government" - it's not Harper who found the boat but rather a government funded expedition. We don't need to follow Conservative Party of Canada communication guidelines / censorship policies -- Tawker (talk) 18:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not sure where it says that Harper found it himself? Curious interpretation. In any case, please see alt blurb (which anyone can suggest by the way). The Rambling Man (talk) 18:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • The Conservative Party likes to refer to the current Ministry as being the "Harper Government", which causes some people to get rather sensitive about any mention of Harper at all - even when contextually appropriate as in this case - because of the supposed implication that Harper and the Canadian government are synonyms. That said, the ALT1 blurb is better whether you refer to Harper by name or the Government in general. Resolute 00:33, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT1 no need to mention who found it but only that is was found. same as we do to the new plants and new animals discoveries. in other case, Canada discovered Terror near an IS-land, would be funny.
      – HonorTheKing (talk) 19:46, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ALT Both the blurb and the alt is missing a "the" in "one of boats".WinterWall (talk) 22:32, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Alt1. Significant discovery, agree with comments about the blurb. Resolute 00:33, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted Stephen 02:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Closed] 2014 Pakistan - India floods

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


 --Prateek Malviya 05:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 8

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business

Disasters and accidents

Health
  • It is reported that nearly one thousand children have been hospitalized with respiratory illnesses in several U.S. states. (USA Today)

Politics and elections

Sports

[Closed] 2014 US Open – Men's Singles

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 
2014 US Open – Men's Singles. (Post
)

Credits:

The nominated event is listed on
WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.
Nominator's comments: History has een made...and the est ever Asian tenis player.. --Lihaas (talk) 23:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Been decided that this is grouped with the Women's Singles as done in the past (see below). --MASEM (t) 23:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[Closed] RD: S. Truett Cathy

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: S. Truett Cathy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
talk to me 12:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Oppose - Chick-fil-A is not even in the top 5 US fast food chains, nor was Cathy one of the 10 richest people in the USA. I'm not sure in what sense that puts him at the top of his field. AlexTiefling (talk) 13:23, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Colonel Sanders maybe. Gamaliel (talk) 13:48, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Agree on above assessments of not really being the top of their field, Chic-fil-A does not have anywhere close to the market size as McDs . --MASEM (t) 14:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Barring recent appearances in the news due to the highly controversial remarks and opinions of the ownership, the company itself does not carry much lasting notability, and by extension, neither does the founder.--WaltCip (talk) 14:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Outside of Atlanta and South Florida, Chick-fil-A is a footnote to the rest of the US, as evidenced by this map of their locations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.95.216.224 (talk) 16:24, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for RD, not full blurb I must digress on this matter from the five opposition arguments. Just last year, CFA (Mr. Cathy) bested KFC (Mr. Sanders) in terms of sales in the United States. Business Week, CNN Money, The New York Times CFA is the No. 9 top fast food chain in the United States, where we are the undisputed founders, kings and champions of fast food, is a tremendous accomplishment. QSR Magazine To boot, it has done so with a greatly reduced number of units. This proves loyalty to the brand by beating KFC with just 37 percent of the restaurant locations that KFC has at its disposal. So, I take it by your comments above Mr. Sanders would not even be eligible for RD if you hold that same criteria to Mr. Cathy. For your information, I don't particularly like Mr. Cathy's politics, but his chicken sandwich restaurant is the little engine that could as compared to KFC.AdditionSubtraction (talk) 03:56, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • The first criteria states "or had a significant contribution/impact on the country/region". CFA is the biggest chicken fast food restaurant in the United States in terms of sales, and it beats goliath KFC in just six days of operation instead of seven. So, significant impact on region of the Southern United States made.AdditionSubtraction (talk) 05:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • KFC does $23 billion in sales, CFA does only $4 billion. Abductive (reasoning) 07:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        • You probably confused KFC's global sales number with its US sales numbers. Last year, CFA pulled in $5 billion while KFC only did $4.22 billion[37]. WinterWall (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
          • The U.S. sales numbers would be more significant compared to the global sales number if we were a U.S.-based encyclopedia. We are not. We are a global encyclopedia. 128.227.222.83 (talk) 12:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
            • "Please do not ... complain about an event only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. This applies to a high percentage of the content we post and is unproductive." --Jayron32 14:44, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • For purposes of "in their field", we're not going to be cutting the bounds of the field to force inclusion. The argument that he ran the largest chicken fast food restaurant (whether true or not) has no impact on whether he ran the larger fast food restaurant. Otherwise, I can see people start to nominate RDs for things like the CEO of the larger Chinese fast food, or Mexican fast food, etc. And don't get me into other industries where the possible bounds can be gamed even more. --MASEM (t) 13:05, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • You mean people like #RD: Gustavo Cerati? –HTD 13:39, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        • Not really. To get there you go : musician (broad category) --> Latin American musician. For this, you need business leader (broad category) --> fast food CEO --> chicken fast food CEO. --MASEM (t) 14:42, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
          • FWIW, "Gustavo Cerati" isn't mentioned at "
            Latin American music". That said, there are very few names, such as Enrique Iglesias, mentioned in that article. So it's musician (broad category) --> Latin American musician --> Argentinian musician, where are pal Gustavo shows up. –HTD 15:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
            ]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 7

Armed conflicts and attacks
  • 2014 Iraq conflict
    :
Disasters and accidents
  • A small plane carrying ten people from
    Amazon jungle, with "little chance of finding survivors". (News24) (eNCA)
Science
  • Asteroid 2014 RC makes a close approach to Earth at 0.1 Lunar Distances (0.000267 astronomical units (39,900 km; 24,800 mi)) at 18:01 UTC (Yahoo News)
Sports

2014 US Open

Articles: 
men's singles at the US Open.
News source(s): Huffington Post

Credits:

One or both nominated events are listed on
talk to me 00:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

I believe that is what we usually do; this is also ITNR. 331dot (talk) 01:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We usually post the Women's once it's known, then modify the blurb to add the Men's once that happens. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Muboshgu is correct. They are both ITN/R. If the women's singles is ready, that can be posted and the men's singles added later. Neljack (talk) 22:14, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, as TRM notes, we'll need the results more than just a table w/o sourcing before the women's can be posted. --MASEM (t) 22:48, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose until the article is more than just tables and a lead with no inline references at all. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:40, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, but the draw pages like
    2014 US Open – Women's Singles are always just a lead and then tables (the general references or external links to the official results support the whole draw so inline references are not needed). We usually bold the main tournament article. The men are done. I have added a suggested altblurb like 2013. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:43, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The men's singles was nominated separately but now refers to here. I have changed the section heading to not mention gender. PrimeHunter (talk) 23:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 6

Armed conflicts and attacks
Disasters
Health
  • West Africa Ebola virus epidemic
    :
Law and crime
  • Mohammed Morsi and nine others for leaking sensitive government information to Qatar. (Reuters)
Politics and elections
Sports
  • Auto racing
    • In the
      Chase for the Sprint Cup. 6-time and defending champion Jimmie Johnson is briefly treated for dehydration following the event, and one spectator was arrested for disorderly conduct after climbing the catch fence surrounding the track during the race. (ESPN)

Monsoons and Flooding in Asia

Article: Climate of Asia (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ More than 200 people are killed in monsoons in China, India, and Pakistan. (Post)
News source(s): CNN USA Today Fox News ABC UPI
Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: This seems notable because of the large death toll. Andise1 (talk) 06:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Df, that's basically my point above. It's like saying the flu killed 2500 last winter in NA. It wasn't one outbreak of one strain over a one week period in Rochester. μηδείς (talk) 02:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As far as i know there were no tropical cyclones affecting India, Pakistan or China over the last week or so. What i believe has happened is that two areas of low pressure have dumped a significant amount of rain on India over the last week during the monsoon season.Jason Rees (talk) 03:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Would you say it would be comparable to
May 18–21, 2013 tornado outbreak then? In that while torandoes + damage in the midwest US is common during the spring/summer months, the 4 days of intense activity was extraordinary ? This is why I think a separate article to talk about this specific system would make sense for the target here. --MASEM (t) 03:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Support, the total amount of water that was dumped in the region is so enormous that this will cause problems for the next few weeks. It will slowly make its way to the more densely populated South where the rivers the water is in meet with the Indus river. This problem is probably going to be smaller but of comparable order to the 2010 Pakistan floods. Count Iblis (talk) 14:55, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Closed] Iran and US

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nergaal (talk
)

Why do you choose to not use the template to make nominations like everyone else does? If you want a news story to be on the main page, please use the template when making nominations and fill it in with the relevant information. Andise1 (talk) 19:38, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you are not formally nominating something, but just want to discuss it, please use the talk page. 331dot (talk) 22:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 5

Armed conflicts and attacks
  • War in Donbass
    :
    • The government of Ukraine and pro-Russian rebels agree to a cease-fire, fighting continues after the announcement. (Reuters)
  • Somali Civil War
    :
    • Moktar Ali Zubeyr was killed in an airstrike on September 1. (Reuters)

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents
  • A privately owned
    cabin depressurization (see also) and crashes 14 miles off the coast of northeastern Jamaica. (Reuters)

International relations

Politics and elections

Ceasefire in
War in Donbass

Article: 
Ukrainian conflict (Post)
News source(s): BBC, NYTimes

Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Clearly important point in the Ukrainian conflict. Note that this is from the official levels - everyone seems to be expected pockets of resistance to this. --MASEM (t) 16:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

obvious support to replace the ongoing, but wed need some concrete details as to the terms. Also just rebels would work (a la usage for Syria)Lihaas (talk) 17:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Article now up-to-date. I support this blurb. RGloucester 17:24, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changed my mind. Clearly not much of a "ceasefire" at all. I now oppose inclusion, per TRM. RGloucester 21:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yeah, that's better than when I nominated. I know details of these specifics are still not big yet, but that primes the article for those when more come in. --MASEM (t) 17:28, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not a single one of these cheesefires has been in good faith, it's just an incremental war, like Hitler's, from 32-39. Putin's will obviously be quicker in this case. But the article itself is not an objective self-contained encyclopedic event. The ongoing status is well merited and this development supports it but any blurb is premature. μηδείς (talk) 00:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Again, that type of thinking is crystal balling it. Yes, it might not hold, but the fact there was a formal cease fire agreement is the news and until it is officially broken, that's what we go with. --MASEM (t) 01:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Crystal balling it is declaring it is serious and significant ahead of time while it's ongoing and several past such promises have been worth hovno. We have already seen such promises fail. (THanks Eugen μηδείς (talk) 18:29, 7 September 2014 (UTC)) There is already an "ongoing" section. Unless the ongoing section is being nominated for deletion (and I may have missed that) there's no need for a separate this week's pretense. μηδείς (talk) 02:31, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, removing that is part of this nom. --MASEM (t) 02:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification, User:Masem. As it stands, I think the status quo is fine, and we can either update with "Russians remove troops from Ukraine" when it happens or leave this as ongoing until either actuallity changes.
What ceasefire? [39] - EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 14:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As noted in my nom, and by reports on the ceasefire, it was unlikely that all violence would immediately stop, due to the nature of command structure and the conflict here. The key is the ceasefire is still agreed to on paper. --MASEM (t) 14:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment would be absurd of us to post "agrees to a ceasefire" which has already been "shaken" by shelling. Suggest this item is parked until we get further information. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cheesefire As we now know, the fighting is still continuing. As in the Israel-Gaza conflict earlier where countless cheesefires were broken by either side, the same is happening here. ITN really should take these announcements with a few more grains of salt than it is currently. Valiant Patriot (talk) 22:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Closed] 2014 Wales summit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


How come nobody nominated this yet?

Nergaal (talk) 11:38, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Because no one has. Are you doing so? 331dot (talk) 14:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SOFIXIT. So far they haven't actually done anything except pose for a lot of photo opportunities, so I'm not sure what the news story would be. I suppose there might be an announcement this evening when the summit ends. Modest Genius talk 15:46, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
Generally notable international gatherings of leaders like this get at least a shot as posting; the news seems focused on the creation of the rapid response force and other initiatives dealing with Russia/Ukraine. 331dot (talk) 15:55, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support posting a blurb related to this. It's a pretty high level gathering of powerful heads of state and there's been a chorus of very harsh criticism of another large state, a kind that is unusual.--Johnsemlak (talk) 16:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
oppose generic post. When something notably concrete comes out of thefinal ommunique then we an see. (if the focus is eukraine then teres a nother blurb abovev)Lihaas (talk) 17:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose cut and paste a template and fill in the relevant information. μηδείς (talk) 02:33, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 4

Disasters

Health

International relations
  • The two-day
    Newport, Wales, begins. Leaders agree to apply further sanctions on Russia. NATO sources claim that there are "several thousand" Russian troops inside Ukraine. (RTE)

Politics and elections

Arts and culture

2014 Zenica mine disaster

Article: 2014 Zenica mine disaster (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ At least five miners are trapped underground after a mine collapses in Bosnia. (Post)
News source(s): ABC News
Credits:

Nominator's comments: It is still uncertain if the five unrescued miners are dead or not, so I decided not to put "believed to be dead" (or something like that) in the hook. --

talk to me 19:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]

Dreadnoughtus schrani

Article: 
Dreadnoughtus schrani, is discovered in southern Patagonia. (Post)
News source(s): Nature New York Times BBC Popular Mechanics CBS News The Guardian Sydney Morning Herald

Credits:

Article needs updating

Nominator's comments: Seems notabe enough for ITN. Andise1 (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support, new dinosaur species always make good ITN items. Especially as big as this one. I'd go with "Discovery of a dinosaur is announced"-type of wording. --Tone 08:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. It appears that article was started on August 22, suggesting this is stale. Abductive (reasoning) 17:04, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • It looks like the mainstream media is only picking up on the story now, the scientific press had this back in August. --MASEM (t) 17:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      • According to the official report from nature.com, the discovery was published yesterday. Also, I believe the general article is "Dreadnoughtus" (which was around before this finding) and the new, specific name (which has just been discovered) is "Dreadnoughtus schrani". Andise1 (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, appears to be significant archeological find, backed by peer-review source (Nature) --MASEM (t) 17:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - significant discovery. sourced. definitely for itn.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - per above supports. International interest, decent article, good news coverage. A refreshing item, and if a photo is available that would be a plus. Jusdafax 19:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, a good story to include. Prioryman (talk) 22:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support once it's cleaned up (the "Etymology" section, at least, is very nearly copied from the paper). This would also be a good opportunity to highlight the featured articles
    [majestic titan] 04:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Support It's a no-brainer (they didn't find the skull). Andrew (talk) 11:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support once the duplicated section is sorted out. This is definitely a significant discovery. Challenger l (talk) 02:37, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support- "Biggest dinosaur ever"s don't get discovered every day. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 03:52, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • In principle, support, but for now oppose until the copyright tag has been dealt with. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Crisco. Supporting an item with a copyright tag is a no-brainer fail I'm afraid. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Gustavo Cerati

Article: Gustavo Cerati (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: RD only (has been under medical care for a few years so more a matter of waiting); appears to be important musician in Latin American circles including winning at least one Latin Grammy award. --MASEM (t) 20:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

[Posted] RD: Joan Rivers

Article: Joan Rivers (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: RD only; died at old age at complications from a heart attack at 81 --MASEM (t) 19:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Please may you explain this comment, The Rambling Man?
WP:NLT applies. 86.158.181.1 (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
99% sure this was a Joan Rivers-ism (or at least a Rivers-like quote) that TRM is citing and in no way a legal threat or attempt a such. eg it is a humorous addition. --MASEM (t) 22:19, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think it refers to the fact that he supported it and posted it anyway(which I have zero problem with). 331dot (talk) 01:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's normal policy that an obvious nomination with four immediate supports, no opposes, and that meets all other requirements, is subject to immediate posting by an independent admin. In this case someone might have made a complaint there was an appearance of irregularity, but on further analysis it would have been found the action was correct. μηδείς (talk) 03:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly
WP:SNOW is the link you are after. GoldenRing (talk) 05:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
DEAR dear...someone had to have the last laught.v. In her own ords: "getting what they deserved". "you know what the Chinese say cookie? beware what you wish for"Lihaas (talk) 11:34, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just toclarify for posterity, there is a 2 senetence update on her death from yest....and it apparently is reason enough for an ITN update. (per precedence now set)Lihaas (talk) 11:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the update encompasses all of what's been happening these past few days, from the surgery to the medically induced coma to the death. – Muboshgu (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you are referring to the opposition to a blurb on the grounds that she was old and/or ill, generally RD is for posting the deaths of notable people, while a blurb is for deaths where the death is newsworthy itself. While her death is getting a lot of attention, that is largely due to her celebrity status and not the suddenness/unexpectedness of it. Occasionally we also post a blurb when the deceased was essentially #1 in importance in their field, too(which I don't think Rivers was). 331dot (talk) 14:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • To compare this to another recent situation, I feel the Robin Williams death was a step above this in terms of ITN. Granted that's a subjective opinion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
hmmm...pseud-subjective. is not doubt RW was miles above notability to this boadLihaas (talk) 17:23, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Closed] Brain to brain communication in humans

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nominator's comments: I wasn't sure what the correct article to link was so if anyone knows a suitable article feel free to add it to the blurb or suggest an altblurb. Andise1 (talk) 06:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. If you look up the actual article in PLOS One (alarm bells ringing straight away there), rather than relying on the 'science' reporting of the Daily Mail (!) of all places, you'll see why I opposed. It has a three paragraph 'results' section, which contains very few actual results and is very light on any quantifiable data. Basically, a dressed up press statement, which may or may not be entirely composed of bovine excrement. (EDIT:Technically not even a nomination, since there is no article linked) Fgf10 (talk) 08:20, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • What precisely do you have against PLOS One? It's a perfectly legitimate peer reviewed journal. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:16, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Erm, no. By their own admission "publish first, judge later". Have you seen the kind of crap that's in there some times? Perfectly good stuff as well, but you wonder why it didn't go into a proper journal if it was good enough. Especially stuff like this does them no favours at all. But that's beyond what we should be discussing here. Fgf10 (talk) 22:58, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. What an excellent way to get people's attention on ITN. Daily Mail notwithstanding, an interesting experiment, employing Bacon's cipher. And using "thoughts" in the sending process. But, as far as I can see, does not count as "communication" in any meaningful sense. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:48, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I transmit thoughts from my brain to other people's brains every day. I'm doing it now (No! Not that thought! You can't do that with an eggwhisk, you'll be arrested!) The blurb is also implying that it's the first time they've done it from one person in India to three people in France, when I'm assuming it is the first time they've done it at all. The blurb would need reworking at the very least, but the story sounds dodgy anyway. Belle (talk) 08:58, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This doesn't appear to be the first time this has been done see here, for example, for a pretty much identical study from last year and the distance involved doesn't seem to mean all that much, since the system uses the Internet. Formerip (talk) 12:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose A coherent, complex image? maybe. A yes-no signal? no. μηδείς (talk) 19:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 3

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

International relations

Science and technology

[Posted] Dendrogramma

Proposed image
Article: Dendrogramma (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Two species of dendrogramma, found off the coast of Australia in 1986, are discovered to be unclassifiable in any existing phylum. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ Newly described dendrogramma specimens may represent a previously unknown phylum of animal life.
News source(s): Guardian
Credits:
Article updated

Nominator's comments: This discovery may lead to the creation of a new phylum, which would be a significant event for the science of biology. To see how rare and interesting of an occurrence this is, take a look at Dendrogramma#Reactions, which says it better than I ever could. --— Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 12:17, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • OpposePost-posting Weak Support (eta due to updated blurb to indicate "may") I was looking at this last night to add to here (the event that a new phylum is a rare event, maybe 4 times per century), however, this story is basically saying that the only samples they've found of Dendrogramma appear to be a new phylum, but the samples, due to how they were stored, were ruined genetically to be able to make the assurance that this was a new phylum and that fresh samples, stored in a manner as to not ruin the DNA, would be needed. And that's not something that's going to happen overnight. (Even the peer-reviewed paper this is in ends on that effect; all microscopic signs point to a new phylum but they can't state that 100% without the DNA to test). --MASEM (t) 13:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Well, actually, the DNA would not confirm this as a new phylum, but just allow its placement in the tree of life. It's certain this critter's body plan (body plans are where scientists like to erect phyla) is very unusual, and ITN posts taxonomically uninteresting new species so why not a new phylum? Abductive (reasoning) 17:09, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My issue is that it is not confirmed yet. Yes, the chances that it is a new phylum based on its biological structure appears very strong, and it wouldn't have been published in a peer reviewed journal if that wasn't a very strong theory. But they can't put it into the books that it is one yet, they need samples uncontaiminated by formaldehyde or ethanol so they can do the generic profile and verify it is sufficiently different from the two other nearby phylums. And importantly, the authors of the paper themselves caution "we think this is new but we need more samples to test"; it's not a random skeptic throwing doubt at this. --MASEM (t) 17:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • I will add in light of the comments below is that the only reason my oppose is that right now is of the doubt that the researchers themselves had. This is an ITN item if there was more surety to the claim, when we compare to other stories that we post (eg we don't post merges when they are announced but after they are completed) If other editors are fine with posting this now, then that's fine, as the story should be posted ITN at some point. --MASEM (t) 20:19, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support regardless of lack of DNA, the physiological uniqueness alone justifies the erection of a new class or order, both of which would merit posting. μηδείς (talk) 19:44, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support while I understand Masems argument these are nonetheless highly interesting new species, which in my opinion is enough to post them already. Also current blurb doesn't actually suggest that they necessarily belong to a completely new phylum so there is no problem there either. SeraV (talk) 20:16, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Highly unusual new organism, whether or not it ultimately gets recorded as a new phylum. I've suggested an alternative blurb that I think works a little better. Dragons flight (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Alt Blurb with "specimens of the genus Dendrogramma" is supported. This really should go up now unless there's a complaint that we don't post new species. μηδείς (talk) 03:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Yep, the alt blurb looks better than the one I thought of. I won't mind at all if my suggestion isn't used. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 04:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support with the alt blurb. Prioryman (talk) 07:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posting altblurb with a slight modification. I am not sure about the picture, all the small text is hard to see in 100px. --Tone 08:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2

Armed conflicts and attacks

Law and crime

Politics and elections

[Posted] Gorham's Cave

Proposed image
Article: Gorham's Cave (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ Archaeologists announce the discovery of possibly the world's oldest piece of abstract art (pictured), attributed to Neanderthals, in Gorham's Cave, Gibraltar. (Post)
News source(s): http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/02/neanderthal-abstract-art-found-gibraltar-cave
Credits:

Article updated

Nominator's comments: Lots of news about this today (see [41]). I've persuaded one of the archaeologists who excavated the find to upload an image of it for us to use. The discovery is unique (thought to be the only known example of Neanderthal abstract art) and the story behind it is interesting, and certainly a change from the run of the mill in ITN recently. --Prioryman (talk) 19:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Posted] Ongoing:
Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Okay, so it's a huge and cumbersome article, but with the alleged second beheading today of another American, and with mass executions and accusations of ethnic cleansing we should have something on the ITN section. It's sub-optimal, but this article is vaguely up to date. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment support the general idea that we should mention ISIS under ongoing but do not support the article title (ISIS), would support an alternate neutral title like - Iraq conflict etc. Legaleagle86 (talk) 19:20, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Definitely - it's perfect for ongoing, each day seems to be a pretty major story. CaptRik (talk) 19:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support comparable in history to Beer Hall Putsch, Occupation of Rhineland. μηδείς (talk) 19:37, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - definitely.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support I don't normally comment here, so please forgive the intrusion. I've noticed for a while now that this huge story has stayed off of the main page. This is an important current event and definitely belongs in the Ongoing section. If the IS article is insufficient, there are other articles that could be linked if necessary.-RHM22 (talk) 21:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support — When article updated. Sca (talk) 21:32, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- Ypnypn (talk) 00:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- definitely need something on this. It's been a glaring omission for a while. It seems to me that the target article could be substantially improved simply by forking the History and Timeline sections off into separate articles; the rest seems fairly reasonable. GoldenRing (talk) 01:21, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[Withdrawn] RD: Norman Gordon

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Norman Gordon (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): REUTERS
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see
WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: The world's oldest test cricketer died at 103. --Nathan121212 (talk) 13:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply
]
  • Oppose a minor cricketer I'm afraid, nowhere near the top of his field. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:57, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw I'll admit that a best of 7 runs in test cricket is not that impressive unfortunately. Nathan121212 (talk) 14:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 1

Armed conflicts and attacks

Law and crime

Ongoing: Pakistan anti-government protest

Article: 
talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Pakistan anti-government protest (Post)
Alternative blurb: Pakistan unrest
News source(s): NYT, Guardian, ToI, BBC

 -- Legaleagle86 (talk) 10:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Nominate under ongoing category. The article is well updated, the unrest is ongoing, has been covered by numerous newsoutlets etc. and has also been mentioned in the wiki Current Events portal. The unrest is important because it may lead to change in government and has already led to hundreds of casualties. Legaleagle86 (talk) 10:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. For Ongoing; alas another area of conflict, let's include it with the others. Mistook the "unrest". Let's change that to Oppose until the protests grow, spread, or have more of an effect. Rhodesisland (talk) 09:41, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose- This is not "another are of conflict", it's protests. Bzweebl (talkcontribs) 00:33, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose at this time. If the change in government occurs,(or worse) that might be ITN worthy and would have a specific blurb to hang our hat on. I don't think it's a broad enough conflict for ongoing yet. 331dot (talk) 02:44, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose nothing since 1 September? Not ongoing. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "Contract Employee Charged in Fire That Grounded Chicago Flights". ABC News. Retrieved 27 September 2014.
  2. ^ "Joachim Gauck welcomes presidents to Mecklenburg to adress demographic change and commemorate the Wende". Official Presidential Website (de). Retrieved 18 September 2014.