Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Wikipedia:miscellany for deletion wikipedia:wikipedia signpost assets include images include css styles.css
The page "Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/assets/include/images/include/css/styles.css" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Creative Commons 4.0 license. It also loads a style sheet from Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Templates/external.css, which is why looks like a pizza menu from...49 bytes (9,732 words) - 00:59, 7 November 2023
- may be deleted at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise...327 bytes (25,690 words) - 17:48, 15 July 2024
- been some more recent deletion discussions of userboxes. Three examples help highlight this: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:FerrousTigrus/ub/non-bias...327 bytes (24,359 words) - 17:49, 15 July 2024
- isn't required. User css loads after global/site css, and last one to load wins. It would be required to override inline HTML styles, which this isn't....498 KB (64,637 words) - 14:01, 29 March 2024
- Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 15 (section Does article "French Meadow Bakery" qualify for Speedy Deletion?)August 2008 (UTC) For those interested, the deletion discussion is here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:May contain nuts. As for does it deserve...204 KB (28,409 words) - 19:04, 2 April 2023
- subject to Miscellany of deletion for deletion my requested one? RenRen070193 (talk) 04:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC) @RenRen070193: Miscellany for deletion is only...401 KB (55,562 words) - 04:45, 30 September 2022
- subpage of Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting would be great. I have actually brought up this suggest here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion...198 KB (30,408 words) - 07:33, 30 January 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (all) (category Wikipedia requests for comment)2024 (UTC) Does that count include the comments in that css file? Maybe it would help just minimizing it to a styles.min.css, and loading that instead...1 KB (108,502 words) - 11:09, 11 June 2022
- nominate it for WP:MFD.-gadfium 05:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC) I see it's already been nominated at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Village pump...251 KB (34,219 words) - 07:27, 7 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 62 (section Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Untagged images)Skomorokh 22:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC) Heads up - Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Untagged images. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 02:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC) A...402 KB (59,515 words) - 20:18, 2 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive129 (section Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:JzG/Troll-B-Gon)copyright images, all credited to Jo Hale/Getty Images, came to be released under free licenses, these photos look like candidates for speedy deletion per WP:CSD#I9...284 KB (37,869 words) - 18:08, 14 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 166 (section Request for comment on the future of Wikipedia:In the news)interest is regained on the subject. See: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion as an example of this. - Knowledgekid87 (talk)...227 KB (32,657 words) - 07:41, 21 February 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive226 (section Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Books#Publishers cited by Wikipedia, Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion, and Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Proposal to require autoconfirmed status in order to create articles/Trial duration)articles at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Drnhawkins/An alternative view of the 3rd dynasty of Egypt and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Drnhawkins/Moses...715 KB (79,148 words) - 08:07, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 29 (section Wizard that suggests article/image pairs (using Wikidata images))(For your interest you can see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Mass-created portals based on a single navbox and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Second...295 KB (43,714 words) - 03:54, 16 September 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive219 (section Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 19#$ony and Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 November 25#File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg)ranges or not. Elockid (Talk) 15:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Demiurge1000/Second enquiry into the Rlevse affair -...616 KB (67,052 words) - 07:58, 3 April 2023
- the pages. Geometry guy 23:44, 27 October 2009 (UTC) True, an Miscellany for deletion would need to be opened at some stage. However we are still quite...313 KB (44,990 words) - 16:02, 17 April 2024
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive268 (section Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Closure review archive)their first 8 days), a tendency to edit inline CSS styles, and a fondness for certain formatting templates. For example, these edits by Squiver are typical...693 KB (99,056 words) - 11:06, 25 May 2022
- Slatersteven (talk) 15:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC) As I look at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, more and more I'm see utterly uncontested deletes. Now, while...352 KB (50,634 words) - 12:59, 15 October 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive965 (section Single purpose account for mass adding articles by a number of PhD students for paid experiment on Wikipedia){{GFDL-presumed}} on Commons is a speedy deletion template for a reason. See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:GFDL-presumed. Licensing statements...803 KB (109,155 words) - 09:07, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1004 (section Proposed image-placement topic ban for Beyond My Ken)block by Q-bit array on Ruwiki for promo. Praxidicae (talk) 15:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC) See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Natalya Guzeeva where salting...800 KB (102,520 words) - 07:03, 10 February 2023
- create an alternative. To push the process for dealing with TeX images at Commons, I have nominated it for deletion, so that the discussion can occur and have