Wikipedia:Multiple sources
This is an essay on notability. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
This page in a nutshell: It would be hard to challenge a subject's notability when the subject is covered by three references in reliable sources that are independent of each other. |
Although in the strictest sense the word "multiple" means "more than one", and in some cases it may indeed be possible to establish notability with only two references, based on existing Wikipedia community norms, it seems that challenges to notability are successfully rebuffed when there are three good in-depth references in
When considering the quality of the sources, it is helpful, but not mandatory, if the authors and/or publications of the references are notable and have Wikipedia articles. Of course, if the author is notable for being a prankster, or the publication is notable as a tabloid, this reduces the quality of the reference.
Applicability
While references are always needed for
- WP:NMUSICestablishes criteria for presumed notability for "musicians, ensembles, composers, lyricists, albums, singles and songs",
- WP:POLITICIANestablishes criteria for presumed notability for politicians
- WP:NCREATIVEestablishes criteria for presumed notability for creative professionals
- WP:NACADEMICestablishes criteria for presumed notability for academics
Multiple sources are needed to establish notability in cases for which no presumed notability guideline exists.
Multiple sources as it relates to events in the news
Since