Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/2011 Super Outbreak/include/images/russia.png" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- How to review a featured article candidate)tornado outbreak in the United States during February 1945. This article reached GA status last year and for over a month, it was posted for a peer review, receiving...4 KB (160,230 words) - 15:13, 24 June 2024mental disease" Russia does not have freedom of panorama, so all images that include 3D objects (including buildings) need to include copyright info for...3 KB (95,506 words) - 02:30, 30 September 2011January 2011 (UTC) I'm struggling with the image in "pathophysiology". Clearly, some of the layers moved about when the images were converted to PNG format...2 KB (191,272 words) - 19:17, 26 March 2011Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive691 (section Talk:Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh#Edit_request_from_67.78.85.67.2C_12_April_2011 edit discussion for consensus)this sort, which includes pointed, ad hominem remarks, is unacceptable? Many thanks in advance. SuperMarioMan 17:55, 26 April 2011 (UTC) My patience...403 KB (54,145 words) - 17:43, 13 March 2023squashed between the images in the confederacy section which is against MOS. Woody (talk) 10:06, 23 July 2009 (UTC) Previous Peer Review is here Its been...10 KB (118,724 words) - 05:44, 5 July 2010least 3 paragraphs long Don't sandwich text between images and don't stack images File:Bialystok_seal.png: don't use Wikipedia as a source, especially since...2 KB (48,518 words) - 21:17, 30 August 2011January 2011 (UTC) Thanks. --Rskp (talk) 00:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC) A good start but I think it need a better copy edit and if it had had a peer review and...4 KB (105,824 words) - 03:26, 26 September 20132011 (UTC) Yes, that's right. I seem to recall that the issue of ISBNs/OCLCs for the Russian sources came up in the peer and previous A class review and...9 KB (248,179 words) - 20:50, 23 January 2012JimSukwutput 15:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC) Yeah, ITN consensus is generally that scientific discoveries be posted when they're peer reviewed, not when they're first...736 KB (90,969 words) - 12:39, 5 June 2022)