Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Wikipedia:peer review automated include css styles.css
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated/include/css/styles.css" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- WikiProject Military history/Peer review)assessment may be made at the assessment request page. Shortcut WP:MHA#PR The peer review process is not used to evaluate an article for a particular assessment...30 KB (2,505 words) - 16:31, 4 June 202400:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC) Review by Scartol To begin with: The use of third-person objective in the lead to this peer review is entirely inappropriate...27 KB (3,680 words) - 20:32, 18 January 2008(UTC) Addressing points from semi-automated peer review I will begin to address points from the semi-automated peer review, and make a note of it here, below...11 KB (107,381 words) - 06:00, 1 December 2010Shortcut WP:USRANK Wikipedia:Gadget – gadgets are user scripts or CSS snippets that can be enabled simply by checking an option in your preferences. The...723 bytes (35 words) - 10:31, 12 February 2022Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 02:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC) I've done everything asked by the automated peer review and would...9 KB (95,942 words) - 18:32, 21 November 2020start a redirect page. Even more weirdly, take a look at Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated/December 2006. Then, click "Edit this page" and look at the source...199 KB (5,090 words) - 16:56, 13 March 2023objectives than a general peer-review. As a first step it may be a good idea to put the proposed article through an automated peer-review. Given the context...7 KB (2,647 words) - 15:29, 12 February 2018Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2017-02-27 (section Peer review – a history and call for reviewers)old reviews were automated by VeblenBot (inactive), created by CBM (inactive), and reviews were split into categories. After creation, peer review rapidly...49 bytes (14,451 words) - 00:57, 7 November 2023Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 111 (section "Arts" Peer reviews transferred to "General" peer reviews?)dash/hyphen styles they preferred, even to mix hyphens and dashes in conflicting styles, such as page ranges "2-5" and "2–6" in the same peer-reviewed article...510 KB (68,619 words) - 14:32, 18 September 2023css optimized for color blindness Technical: Help:User style m:Help:Cascading style sheets Wikipedia:Catalogue of CSS classes Wikipedia:Useful styles...313 KB (33,157 words) - 20:24, 24 April 2024Thank you, michael talk 13:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 21:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC) This...14 KB (145,596 words) - 22:33, 21 May 2008principle that "When either of two styles is acceptable it is inappropriate for a Wikipedia editor to change from one style to another unless there is some...223 KB (25,298 words) - 06:24, 18 June 2024at Peer review – on top of a house style check generated by a script written by AndyZ and operated by Ruhrfisch – more participation at peer review is...2 KB (3,886 words) - 00:51, 6 January 2024the old, broken behavior by customizing your user CSS. See the new diff.css for the current styles; the bits you'd want to "reverse" are the overflow:...201 KB (29,794 words) - 10:30, 21 March 2023Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 01:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC) I can't see anything pertinent in the auto-review, but does...61 KB (10,065 words) - 16:05, 14 August 2021It has been noted as a Good Article and has undergone an extensive Peer Review from which all of the issues I believe were taken care of. I think this...26 KB (3,931 words) - 21:27, 9 February 2023Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 99 (section Restore watchlist bolding after the new change to Common.css on May 17)Looks like any bold attempt is being overridden, I guess by common.css? Other styles do work. I'm not complaining though. Considering the response I think...540 KB (71,952 words) - 10:56, 19 February 2024
- | Traditionally published | Self-published but yet peer reviewed original research | A peer review verification process | Dewey Defeats Truman | Wikilivres
- data issue, not relate to the login styles (we didn't actually change how authentication works, just the visual styles). Steven (WMF) (talk) 23:13, 10 May
)