Search results
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/Bigfoot/include/js/include/images/russia.png" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Users demand peer review because they know that it won't exist, and they do it because they want to reduce articles to "He said he saw a Bigfoot, but he doesn't...198 KB (29,570 words) - 20:21, 2 March 2023
- can a user draw their own sketch of Bigfoot, based on the description given on the Bigfoot page, and use that image as the page's main graphic? Or could...221 KB (29,083 words) - 13:15, 27 December 2023
- png Image:Stop hand.png looks damaged Image:Thomas Sowell.jpg Image:YoungGould.jpg Images Images "by" User:RoboRanks Images (especially flags) not...1 KB (32,606 words) - 04:02, 27 April 2023
- appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page. The result was DELETE. Shirahadasha...9 KB (36,853 words) - 05:04, 5 April 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1069 (section Editor off the rails wrt Bigfoot video)our purposes, 'what I see' isn't confirmable (and we prefer SVG images over PNG images). They've also tried to 'delete' the SVG even though it's clearly...801 KB (108,826 words) - 16:59, 3 April 2022
- isn't deleted, it needs to be trimmed down to a stub, akin to the The Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization article, which is a more credible entity...9 KB (115,667 words) - 22:07, 18 October 2022
- bringing up some radical fringe position (UFOs are real! They teamed up with bigfoot to shoot JFK!), after a while people just stop listening to him/her. --Bachrach44...302 KB (43,255 words) - 12:58, 15 October 2023
- above, there are *no* peer reviewed articles on this effect. None. New Scientist is not in the business of providing peer review or scientific examination...7 KB (65,954 words) - 20:18, 18 October 2022
- and descriptions of images instead of the images themselves. If I'm reading this correctly, the English Wikipedia, if you include all pages with complete...1.01 MB (157,052 words) - 15:22, 4 January 2023
- the 17th March. The project aims to combine existing peer review mechanisms (Wikipedia peer review, featured article candidate discussion, article assessment...201 KB (29,188 words) - 15:30, 28 January 2023
- effect". This peer reviewed publication has been cited by 6 other peer reviewed publications and in one book/policy document The citations include : Journals...398 KB (53,265 words) - 09:44, 28 February 2024