Search results
Appearance
Showing results for Wikipedia:peer review crush_40 include css selected full.min.js. No results found for Wikipedia:Peer_review/Crush_40/include/css/select2.full.min.js.
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/Crush 40/include/css/select2.full.min.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- (Peace) 13:40, 4 April 2006 (UTC) This is just a QaD mockup in wiki:table markup, I imagine that the CSS for the front page could include a special element...199 KB (28,644 words) - 00:45, 22 August 2023
- added to your local wiki's Common.css page, which is explained at T287701. From now on, all usages should include the full attributes, for example: <div...497 KB (62,749 words) - 15:27, 18 March 2023
- that admins are not really held accountable for anything. Sure, there's peer review from other admins, and all admin actions are logged and can be undone...199 KB (29,930 words) - 12:46, 17 June 2022
- randomly selected example, the Clara Schumann peer review generates "Wikipedia:Peer review/Clara Schumann/archive1") I suggest that all such unopened peer reviews...301 KB (37,452 words) - 13:38, 19 June 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive72 (section Edit warring between Nationalist (talk · contribs) and Jerrypp772000 (talk · contribs) includes personal attacks)given 0 mins at all to fix it cause the tags were placed on my talkpage the same time that the block was given. So in conclusion i would like a review on both...378 KB (52,565 words) - 22:14, 8 April 2023
- to just do CSS - Disable styles - All styles, then hit the edit link. Or with Nuke Anything Enhanced, just right-click on the page and select "Remove this...234 KB (29,708 words) - 05:06, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 70 (section Revolutionizing Peer review and the accademic Process through wiki: Involving the Professors and digitizing academia)The CSS is now at User:Gadget850/talkhighlight.css. You can test it by importing it to Special:MyPage/skin.js: importStylesheet('Us...302 KB (99,822 words) - 13:14, 4 June 2022
- to WP:MED have consistently patrolled controversial articles seeking to crush a minority POV. That argument would carry a lot of weight with a good deal...614 KB (79,951 words) - 05:52, 9 July 2024
- this page contains 340 KB of useful image but 660 KB of useless player CSS, JS and SWF. -84user (talk) 10:49, 26 October 2013 (UTC) There is certainly...440 KB (64,692 words) - 10:13, 7 August 2023
- Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1053 (section Probably another notability question - draft article reviewed and rejected, I disagree but would love some pointers)point me to documentation or an example. AND please dont suggest changing css or js files. i dont want to mess with them. Leela52452 (talk) 14:14, 26 March...391 KB (51,823 words) - 13:05, 15 October 2023
- can be found in the peer review. Nousernamesleft (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC) Restart, old nom. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)...4 KB (142,485 words) - 17:29, 31 January 2009
- false until they prove the actual origin - which takes a lot of data and peer review. How long do we need to allow people who are obviously here to right...797 KB (108,381 words) - 23:00, 27 September 2023
- following line to your Special:MyPage/skin.js; importScript('User:Tim Song/afchelper4.js'); ...that gives you a 'review' button when you look at a pending submission...441 KB (57,652 words) - 14:05, 23 April 2023
- gets only 25 views per minute. The 1000th gets 4 views/min. The 5000th gets less than 2 views/min. That means that nearly 99.9% of articles get fewer views...297 KB (44,055 words) - 17:57, 11 September 2022
- User:Vinaymakamanjaneya/vector.js U5 User:Vinaymakamanjaneya/vector.css U5 User:Agarwal.rgniyd/common.css U5 User:Dquiambao/common.css G12 --Thanks, Cabayi (talk)...806 KB (111,818 words) - 11:01, 20 October 2020
- Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/January 2022 (section Source review from Ealdgyth)Ergo Sum 01:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC) "Maryland clergy who were selected from by their peers": presumably should be "from and by"? Yes, that was a typo. Fixed...2 KB (103,894 words) - 21:38, 31 January 2022
- very much for your kind words, edits, peer review and support, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 19:06, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Full Support with comments. Another excellent...3 KB (171,917 words) - 17:23, 31 December 2008
- different linked CSS and maybe JS? ¤ ehudshapira 14:35, 27 January 2023 (UTC) It should, but modern web designers don't understand what was CSS developed for...889 KB (125,090 words) - 12:57, 12 April 2023
- aspirations crushed at AfC. I think I've suggested this somewhere before, and see people occasionally ask it at the Teahouse, but a pre-draft source review would...296 KB (41,091 words) - 09:08, 28 February 2024
- the choice to not include them in mobile viewing as proof the review process is wasteful. While Levivich is correct that the peer review process can be hijacked...309 KB (42,136 words) - 19:54, 29 April 2024