Search results
Appearance
Did you mean: Wikipedia:peer review john adams include js speech.js
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/John Adams/include/js/speech.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- How to review a featured article candidate)source. I felt like the peer review was stagnant already. But I already attempted to resolve everyone's concerns at the peer review and got no reply back...4 KB (133,878 words) - 00:05, 26 July 2024(UTC) I think we'll take these general advice questions to the Wikipedia:Peer_review page, after a little planning and effort and discussion at our end. --...254 KB (35,660 words) - 12:29, 3 April 2023of abuse". The Sunday Times. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help) "Peer commentaries on Green (2002) and Schmidt (2002)". Archives of Sexual Behavior...2 KB (110 words) - 06:11, 23 March 2011resolved anything and peer review can't. How is someone supposed to resolve a dispute when one party will never back down? John Smith's 23:34, 28 December...5 KB (84,260 words) - 19:43, 6 December 2020Wikipedia:Academic studies of health information on Wikipedia (section Summaries, literature reviews of studies on Wikipedia's medical content)Schmidt L, Friedel J, Adams CE (17 October 2017). "SEED: a tool for disseminating systematic review data into Wikipedia". Systematic Reviews. 6 (1): 206. doi:10...113 KB (11,915 words) - 06:27, 24 July 2024so ably demonstrated, secondary sources exist. In fact, these are in peer-reviewed business and economics academic journals. There are books as well. This...6 KB (51,800 words) - 05:03, 5 April 2022page Gary King has offered to maintain the script at User:Gary King/peer reviewer.js. — Dispenser 11:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Thanks very much - I actually...154 KB (15,332 words) - 10:11, 9 February 2023Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 53 (section Holes in GA / FA review process for "academic" or "technical" subjects)sometimes more a test of patience and knowledge of MOS as it is a genuine "peer review" from a content perspective, but by and large the system works and is...255 KB (38,490 words) - 13:17, 4 June 2022
- prevented by the requirement that works be "published in a medium that includes peer review or editorial controls; this excludes self-publication". Unfortunately
)