Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/Ross Sea party/assets/include/css/styles.css" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...11 KB (77,295 words) - 04:28, 1 January 2011
- Military history project talk page, directing any interested parties to the peer review, so hopefully some more comments will come soon. Cheers. — AustralianRupert...10 KB (118,724 words) - 05:44, 5 July 2010
- from VPT post) TemplateStyles allow custom CSS pages to be used to style content without an administrator having to edit sitewide CSS. This will make it more...327 bytes (25,687 words) - 17:48, 15 July 2024
- independent review of "Vibraimage". 2.) Until the thory that vibrations in a digital image correlate to emotional states has sustained peer review, it would...8 KB (80,112 words) - 09:17, 5 April 2022
- ‘anybody’, or as in real books and encyclopaedias reviewed by peers? Or have the ‘anybodies’ reviewed and vetted first? If the items posted by ‘anybody’...9 KB (72,179 words) - 10:01, 5 April 2022
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 70 (section Revolutionizing Peer review and the accademic Process through wiki: Involving the Professors and digitizing academia)accademia giving professors access to a vast sea of ideas while establishing an interactive process of peer review which is constantly being refined by the...302 KB (99,822 words) - 13:14, 4 June 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive939 (section Correct and substantiated information was reverted without review.)results for the two largest parties. This can be a problem, especially where the respectable or even winning by-state totals for Ross Perot and George Wallace...803 KB (110,045 words) - 18:08, 20 May 2024
- modern styles (everyone basically aspired to write in the Italian style or the French style), and he managed to master the historical styles as well...3 KB (165,744 words) - 21:05, 31 August 2008
- algorithm. The information should not be deleted... there are quite a few peer-reviewed journals that mention the Raita algorithm. DavidDelaune (talk) 20:18...6 KB (46,676 words) - 11:59, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive958 (section Semi-protection for Swarna Bharat Party)deleted.[207]. The parties seem to be fighting over how many pictures of churches to include.[208]. It's not entirely clear what the parties are arguing over...796 KB (107,420 words) - 04:43, 11 May 2024
- WP:JOURNALIST#1 includes, "is widely cited by peers or successors", and I have not yet looked closely at the specifics. Also, the Columbia Journalism Review is independent/reliable...8 KB (46,417 words) - 06:21, 26 October 2022
- painting, File:William Holman Hunt - The Scapegoat.jpg is already up for peer review and possibly featured status. Uncle G (talk) 20:23, 14 August 2010 (UTC)...251 KB (36,974 words) - 08:01, 21 April 2023
- the entire Brown family selling personal assets" Suggest "Although Brown family members sold personal assets" Done. I think that was the way it was once...3 KB (177,726 words) - 12:39, 1 June 2013
- clarification. -- Hoary (talk) 08:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC) Green (for those with CSS) interpolation added 03:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC) I agree that he has been...689 KB (93,567 words) - 09:23, 3 April 2023
- Source review Earwig's tool found only mirrors, a few quick spotchecks found no concerning close paraphrasing Ref 9: source gives author as Ross Miller...2 KB (191,272 words) - 19:17, 26 March 2011
- originally got involved for the sole purpose of peer reviewing for Jehochman. After the peer review, Jehochman asked me to help expand parts of the article...3 KB (162,621 words) - 21:31, 30 May 2009
- They're really appreciated and demonstrate just how valuable a third-party peer review and copyedit is. I'll work through these and reply to your talk page...4 KB (194,793 words) - 21:02, 31 May 2008
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/2009/Promoted (category WikiProject Military history review archives)Went through this at Peer Review and since then further detail has been added and improvements made. I picked up the odd minor style inconsistency and made...14 KB (219,739 words) - 21:45, 2 May 2010
- gold" on google (include quotes) and you will find numerous reviews and criticisms which use this, including many from peer-reviewed scholarly literature...13 KB (156,231 words) - 00:41, 18 October 2022
- it accessible. The site's disclaimer clearly states that there is no peer review of material or guarantee of validity, which I read to mean, no verification...305 KB (47,050 words) - 00:52, 11 February 2023