Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/Ross Sea party/assets/include/js/speech.js" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...11 KB (101,740 words) - 02:33, 11 February 2016
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...13 KB (111,142 words) - 19:55, 19 May 2008
- Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2006-05-09 (category Reviewed AfC submissions)military asset designed in Sweden. The Germans would likely have been very interested to know the whereabouts of the American Legion on the high-seas, since...461 KB (1,527 words) - 23:27, 4 February 2023
- their yachts, luxury jet planes, and financial assets, in order for Western governments to seize these assets and pressure Putin to stop the war. There are...327 bytes (22,491 words) - 17:48, 15 July 2024
- to Zxcvbnm and Ultraexactzz. RossPatterson (talk) 23:39, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Keep - We seem to have moved from the review phase to the removal candidate...1 KB (80,111 words) - 22:00, 16 February 2017
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive552 (section Theserialcomma baiting block review)improvements. Without third party involvement, even highly dubious POV sources as Middle East Quarterly journal is mispresented as peer reviewed in Wikipedia. Criticism...606 KB (58,837 words) - 04:59, 14 March 2023
- unjustified in this case. The peer review notice appears quite clearly at the top of the talk page indicating that the peer review is now archived. It is true...703 KB (92,890 words) - 10:52, 19 February 2024
- offered is some third party blogs/websites, that strike me as a clearly low-circulation, non-scholarly (at least not peer-reviewed scholarly), privately...6 KB (52,864 words) - 00:40, 18 October 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive169 (section Requesting review of User:Moulton's block)of editors who edited the Picard article. Your piped links to Freedom of speech are odd in that you seem to be supporting Moulton's campaign to censor information...403 KB (55,939 words) - 10:31, 3 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive646 (section Legal threat at Jason Ross (actor))(UTC) See here for the official peer review of this case Count Iblis (talk) 15:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC) "Official peer review," he says. — The Hand That Feeds...612 KB (72,828 words) - 10:22, 7 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 70 (section Revolutionizing Peer review and the accademic Process through wiki: Involving the Professors and digitizing academia)accademia giving professors access to a vast sea of ideas while establishing an interactive process of peer review which is constantly being refined by the...302 KB (99,823 words) - 13:14, 4 June 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive958 (section Semi-protection for Swarna Bharat Party)deleted.[207]. The parties seem to be fighting over how many pictures of churches to include.[208]. It's not entirely clear what the parties are arguing over...796 KB (107,420 words) - 14:07, 17 August 2024
- with the words of WP:NOR: In general, the most reliable sources are: Peer-reviewed journals Books published by university presses University-level textbooks...8 KB (50,303 words) - 12:43, 3 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive214 (section Would some one Close this thread as a third party)Could somebody please close the AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David R. Ross? It qualifies for a non-admin closure and the nominator basically indicated...603 KB (65,641 words) - 10:37, 21 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1073 (section Could somebody review and decide on this?)what more do we want? The point about WP is that it is so strongly peer-reviewed that there is no advantage to paying. Frankly if a person is daft enough...719 KB (95,345 words) - 14:40, 1 March 2024
- Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/October 2009 (section Intimacy (Bloc Party album))of the peer reviewers, I reviewed to FAC standards, and my issues were addressed. Those interested can look at my comments at the peer review page, which...4 KB (171,030 words) - 23:56, 31 October 2009
- Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Featured log/January 2014 (section Source review from Nikkimaria)(UTC) Image review Pedal caption shouldn't end in period Fixed. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 16:42, 30 December 2013 (UTC) File:Bertran_Philander_Ross...2 KB (125,645 words) - 00:13, 1 February 2014
- gold" on google (include quotes) and you will find numerous reviews and criticisms which use this, including many from peer-reviewed scholarly literature...13 KB (156,231 words) - 00:41, 18 October 2022
- ROT13 Scene7 Search engine (computing) Search engine optimization Spamming Speech synthesis Spyware Storm botnet Ubuntu Wikipedia Windows 2000 Windows XP...388 KB (27,334 words) - 12:26, 31 August 2024
- that of Casablanca. Two third party references isn't going to cut it. This is the kind of cleanup you need at Peer Review to pass at GA, so I'd highly...4 KB (90,375 words) - 10:57, 11 October 2020