Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/United Abominations/include/images/usa.png" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- this peer review is not transcluded. It is now closed and located at Wikipedia:Peer review/Leeds United A.F.C. seasons/archive2. (Peer review added on...20 KB (71,180 words) - 21:46, 30 May 2008
- Because of its length, this peer review is not transcluded. It is still open and located at Wikipedia:Peer review/United Abominations/archive2. Article (edit...11 KB (76,403 words) - 02:10, 11 February 2016
- This page contains the Peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become...6 KB (56,772 words) - 00:25, 10 July 2022
- Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/March 2009 (section List of National Monuments of the United States)boxing writer (Antonio Martin). After undergoing peer review, I applied a few tweaks, but most of the review's concern were of technical nature and they have...4 KB (31,989 words) - 02:42, 23 January 2010
- Recent Military Peer Review Past Nomination Original Military History Peer Review Original Peer Review Support. As I said in its peer-review with my poor...3 KB (150,072 words) - 18:59, 22 November 2020
- of public domain images. I was wondering if this also applies to works where the image in question is located outside of the United States? --Oden 17:41...221 KB (29,083 words) - 13:15, 27 December 2023
- eleventh album, United Abominations, was released May of the following year. or even just Megadeth's eleventh album, United Abominations, was released May...3 KB (119,438 words) - 13:53, 29 August 2014
- featured article It's got a trivia section. I shudder at the sight of these abominations, and am bringing this to wider attention in the hope that reviewers will...2 KB (43,597 words) - 00:17, 16 February 2017
- article on that topic, because unlike a peer-reviewed journal, a wikipedia article is subject to review by non-peers. That works well if we are talking about...199 KB (31,357 words) - 03:17, 15 November 2023
- the Spire of Dublin, is a worthy successor. After a pretty thorough peer review and some excellent suggestions for improvements, we feel it is ready...2 KB (76,943 words) - 20:25, 30 March 2016
- we need to include such fantasies ? Materialscientist (talk) 12:27, 27 June 2009 (UTC) That was (again) a specific suggestion at Peer Review by Ruhrfisch...2 KB (129,556 words) - 21:48, 28 July 2009
- fair use images). Then someone can add the logo to the article by editing the infobox so it includes something like |image = [[File:Mdex logo.png|alt=Mdex...401 KB (53,807 words) - 06:02, 20 May 2022
- it was not presented first via a technical journal nor submitted to peer review before publication. I published it using the most expedient means necessary...6 KB (53,669 words) - 15:55, 3 March 2023
- 22:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Fair enough. If it's been discussed in two peer-reviewed thesises, I can't argue against that. Withdraw nomination, but this...8 KB (83,151 words) - 09:18, 5 April 2022
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive642 (section Admin closure requested at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Naming conventions for United States federal buildings)would discuss this situation, meanwhile editing one of his other tagging abominations. The "too long" tag is also not helpful on a high level article about...605 KB (79,918 words) - 07:35, 10 May 2024
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive113 (section List of non-free images used outside of mainspace)believes that "non-mainstream" is the same thing as "not peer-reviewed" and edited the article to include this mistaken 'information' as a clarification. Furthermore...274 KB (35,184 words) - 16:14, 15 April 2023
- detail and size of this image. Excellent micrograph. — raekyT 21:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC) Support per my reasons in peer review, I wonder how anyone can...9 KB (101,952 words) - 22:37, 17 June 2020
- 16:52, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Support on prose and images, per my comments at the Peer Review and review of the changes since then. Note that I am not a...3 KB (177,726 words) - 12:39, 1 June 2013
- statement that he "bet" it wouldn't work is conjecture, not science. As for peer-review, the PPC was never submitted for such. That fact in and of itself does...5 KB (48,388 words) - 15:09, 3 March 2023
- comments: First off, images. File:Paramount Television Network.png: Did you make the radio towers yourself? Where's the image of the United States from? I think...3 KB (133,074 words) - 13:31, 28 May 2010
- rules simply. As for speedy, we don't include images into speedy candidates, though sometimes we deleted images uploaded for vandalism speedily, so this
- prevented by the requirement that works be "published in a medium that includes peer review or editorial controls; this excludes self-publication". Unfortunately