Search results
Appearance
The page "Wikipedia:Peer review/United Abominations/js/include/images/usa.png" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
- Because of its length, this peer review is not transcluded. It is still open and located at Wikipedia:Peer review/United Abominations/archive2. Article (edit...11 KB (76,403 words) - 02:10, 11 February 2016
- of public domain images. I was wondering if this also applies to works where the image in question is located outside of the United States? --Oden 17:41...221 KB (29,083 words) - 13:15, 27 December 2023
- eleventh album, United Abominations, was released May of the following year. or even just Megadeth's eleventh album, United Abominations, was released May...3 KB (119,438 words) - 13:53, 29 August 2014
- the Spire of Dublin, is a worthy successor. After a pretty thorough peer review and some excellent suggestions for improvements, we feel it is ready...2 KB (76,943 words) - 20:25, 30 March 2016
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive113 (section List of non-free images used outside of mainspace)believes that "non-mainstream" is the same thing as "not peer-reviewed" and edited the article to include this mistaken 'information' as a clarification. Furthermore...274 KB (35,184 words) - 16:14, 15 April 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive642 (section Admin closure requested at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Naming conventions for United States federal buildings)would discuss this situation, meanwhile editing one of his other tagging abominations. The "too long" tag is also not helpful on a high level article about...605 KB (79,918 words) - 07:35, 10 May 2024
- 22:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC) Fair enough. If it's been discussed in two peer-reviewed thesises, I can't argue against that. Withdraw nomination, but this...8 KB (83,151 words) - 09:18, 5 April 2022
- Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 5 (section A peer review thank you template to incentivize, reward, and quantify helpful peer reviews)than you probably need. To recognize peer reviews, you'd probably need to be able to include a link to the review given, to the article title and perhaps...307 KB (45,081 words) - 10:21, 15 October 2023
- There was also a concern about the number of images of Canadian teams in a peer review. I think the images do add to the page, and since they are free...4 KB (175,513 words) - 16:56, 30 June 2009
- in the peer reviewed causal review correctly and in the same way the authors plainly state my interpretation. Why do you believe that the peer reviewers...784 KB (107,425 words) - 11:38, 13 March 2023
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive321 (section Review of the indefinite block of Cesdeva)based on unreliable source(an anti-Muslim hate blog), In the Quran, abominations include idolatry, divination, gambling, and intoxicants; eating blood, dead...679 KB (92,243 words) - 06:32, 10 February 2023
- our purposes, 'what I see' isn't confirmable (and we prefer SVG images over PNG images). They've also tried to 'delete' the SVG even though it's clearly...801 KB (108,826 words) - 16:59, 3 April 2022
- several gold medals representing the United States in youth tournaments. This article briefly went through a peer review and I believe it meets the criteria...2 KB (154,928 words) - 21:41, 28 February 2022
- (UTC) how do add images to google images? You don't. The Google webcrawlers should pick up the image and categorise it based on the image filename, the link...683 KB (103,963 words) - 15:43, 3 May 2024
- "do I believe the hype?" Not sure it has all the scientific backing, peer reviews etc required to meet ITN, hence the call on Abductive (like Batman) to...505 KB (57,706 words) - 17:26, 14 December 2023
- prevented by the requirement that works be "published in a medium that includes peer review or editorial controls; this excludes self-publication". Unfortunately