Wikipedia:Picture peer review/File:U2 Image of Cuban Missile Crisis.jpg
U2 Missile Image from Cuban Missile Crisis
One of the most important images in recent history. Despite small size, its irreplaceable, and critically important.
- Articles this image appears in
- Cuban Missile Crisis
- Creator
- The CIA
- Suggested by
- Nuclear Lunch Detected Hungry? 18:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
- Comments
- Unlikely to succeed due to the small size and limited EV. ZooFa ri 23:42, 3 December 2009 (UTC)]
- Explain "limited EV" please. This photo almost got the earth crisped Nuclear Lunch Detected Hungry? 05:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
- Small file size is kind of excusable, as despite the very large-format cameras used, it would have been taken from 60,000 feet or more and would have resolved only very slightly better detail than this on film. Considering the image placement at the moment and the fact that it isn't an iconic image in its own right, I'd say the "limited EV" comment was fair judgement. If it was the defining image of the crisis, it would be the lead image in the article. Placing it at reconnaisance or other places where it also has relevance would increase EV, but not perhaps to FPC required levels. This is because it's not unique; another image of the same place (and better annotated) is already at the latter article and is not only more informative, it's clearly presented as the defining image of the U2 reconnaissance missions over Cuba. Interesting though, viz. my first point, that the higher resolution there doesn't yield any more information than your nomination here. mikaultalk 20:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)]
- Small file size is kind of excusable, as despite the very large-format cameras used, it would have been taken from 60,000 feet or more and would have resolved only very slightly better detail than this on film. Considering the image placement at the moment and the fact that it isn't an iconic image in its own right, I'd say the "limited EV" comment was fair judgement. If it was the defining image of the crisis, it would be the lead image in the article. Placing it at
- Disagree with ZooFari commentary about EV (which means Exposure Value (jggifys)) because this is an example of state of the art reconnaissance photography from the early 60's. The EV doesn't represent poor composition from the photography. Also disagree with MIckStephenson comment about the other image being of the same place, as it's not clear that it is. What this photo lacks is a source citation. Not sure where it's from, what day it was taken, which target it refers to, etc. Assertions that this is one of the most important images in recent history are unsupported by reference information. Jeffme (talk) 04:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Seconder
